ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00262080

Efficacy and Safety Study of DX-88 to Treat Acute Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)

NCT00262080, Phase 3, Completed, Shire; results first posted 2010-05-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety Study of DX-88 to Treat Acute Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema (HAE). Trials, record NCT00262080. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00262080

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety Study of DX-88 to Treat Acute Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)
NCT number
NCT00262080
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
91 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Shire
Conditions
Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)
Interventions
ecallantide, Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS),
First posted
2005-12-06
Last updated
2021-06-11
Results first posted
2010-05-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTreatment Outcome Score at 4 Hours Post-Dose4 hours post-dose (DOUBLE-BLIND PART)
Treatment Outcome Score (TOS) is a validated, comprehensive measure of symptom response to treatment. At 4 hours , patient assessment of response characterized by their change from baseline in symptom severity and collected by anatomic site of attack involvement, was recorded on a categorical scale (significant improvement \[100\] to significant worsening \[-100\]). The response at each anatomic site was weighted by baseline severity and then the weighted scores across all involved sites were averaged to calculate the TOS. Clinically meaningful improvement was indicated by a TOS of 30 or higher.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-dosebaseline, 4 hours post-dose (DOUBLE-BLIND PART)
Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) score is a validated, comprehensive point-in-time measure of symptom severity. At baseline and 4 hours, patients rated the severity on a categorical scale (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) for symptoms at each affected anatomical location. Ratings were averaged to obtain the MSCS score. A decrease in MSCS score reflected an improvement in symptoms; clinically meaningful improvement (minimally important difference) was indicated by a reduction in the score of 0.30 or more.
SecondaryTime to Significant Improvement in Overall Response4 hours post-dose (DOUBLE-BLIND PART)
The overall response assessment is a patient-reported assessment of global response to therapy. Patients are asked to perform an overall response assessment at regular intervals, relative to baseline. Patients were asked "overall how are you feeling" compared to how they felt before study drug. Answer options were "a lot worse", "a little worse", "same", "a little better" or "a lot better or resolved". Significant improvement was the first time that the patient responded to the assessment as "a little better or resolved".
OtherNumber of Patients With Symptom Complexes of Treated Attack at Baseline(DOUBLE-BLIND PART)Baseline
Patient-reported severity of symptom complexes at baseline, by symptom complex and treatment group. Patients were to have at least one symptom complex that was moderate or severe. Patients could present with multiple symptom complexes, some of which could be mild. Mild=noticeable but do not impact daily living activities; Moderate=treatment or intervention is highly desirable and activities of daily living are impacted; Severe=require treatment or intervention due to inability to perform activities of daily living. The results are for number of patients with symptom complexes including mild, moderate and severe, provided the patients have at least one symptom complex that was moderate or severe
OtherTreatment Outcome Score at 4 Hours Post-Dose Over Multiple Treatment Episodes4 hours post-dose (REPEAT-DOSING PART)
Treatment Outcome Score (TOS) is a validated, comprehensive measure of symptom response to treatment. At 4 hours , patient assessment of response characterized by their change from baseline in symptom severity and collected by anatomic site of attack involvement, was recorded on a categorical scale (significant improvement \[100\] to significant worsening \[-100\]). The response at each anatomic site was weighted by baseline severity and then the weighted scores across all involved sites were averaged to calculate the TOS. Clinically meaningful improvement was indicated by a TOS of 30 or higher.
OtherChange From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-dose Over Multiple Treatment Episodesbaseline, 4 hours post-dose (REPEAT-DOSING PART)
The Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) score is a validated, comprehensive point-in-time measure of symptom severity. At baseline and 4 hours, patients rated the severity on a categorical scale (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) for symptoms at each affected anatomical location. Ratings were averaged to obtain the MSCS score. A decrease in MSCS score reflected an improvement in symptoms; clinically meaningful improvement was indicated by a reduction in the score of 0.30 or more.
OtherTime to Significant Improvement in Overall Response Over Multiple Treatment Episodes4 hours post-dose (REPEAT-DOSING PART)
The overall response assessment is a patient-reported assessment of global response to therapy. Patients are asked to perform an overall response assessment at regular intervals, relative to baseline (ie,immediately before treatment) using the following 5-category scale from significant improvement (Score = 100)to significant worsening (Score = -100)

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYTreatment Outcome Score at 4 Hours Post-Dose4 hours post-dose (DOUBLE-BLIND PART)
ITT as treated: two patients randomized on the same day at the same study center were administered treatment opposite to their randomized treatment assignment. Data were analyzed based on actual treatment received. Imputation was used to account for emerging symptoms and medical intervention. Best possible score = 100; worst possible score = -100.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-dosebaseline, 4 hours post-dose (DOUBLE-BLIND PART)
ITT as treated: two patients randomized on the same day at the same center were administered treatment opposite to their randomized treatment assignments. Data were analyzed based on their actual treatment received. Imputation was used to account for emerging symptoms and medical intervention. Best possible score = 0.0; worst possible score = 3.0.
units on a scaleMEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDNumber of Patients With Symptom Complexes of Treated Attack at Baseline(DOUBLE-BLIND PART)BaselineparticipantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDTreatment Outcome Score at 4 Hours Post-Dose Over Multiple Treatment Episodes4 hours post-dose (REPEAT-DOSING PART)
Treatment episode 1 contains data only from those participants who were new patients in the repeat-dosing part. Treatment episode 2 and beyond contain data pooled from patients treated in the double-blind part (ecallantide or placebo) and the repeat-dosing part. Data imputation was used to account for emerging symptoms and medical intervention.
units on a scaleMEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDChange From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-dose Over Multiple Treatment Episodesbaseline, 4 hours post-dose (REPEAT-DOSING PART)
Treatment episode 1 contains data only from those participants who were new patients in the repeat-dosing part. Treatment episode 2 and beyond contain data pooled from patients treated in the double-blind part (ecallantide or placebo) and the repeat-dosing part. Data imputation was used to account for emerging symptoms and medical intervention.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYTime to Significant Improvement in Overall Response4 hours post-dose (DOUBLE-BLIND PART)
ITT as treated. Patients not reporting significant improvement before 4 hours were censored at 4 hours. Patients receiving additional HAE therapy within 4 hours were censored at the time of the medical intervention. The time to significant improvement is not provided in this display as the median time for placebo was not reached by 4 hours.
participantNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDTime to Significant Improvement in Overall Response Over Multiple Treatment Episodes4 hours post-dose (REPEAT-DOSING PART)
Patients not reporting significant improvement before 4 hours were censored at 4 hours. Patients receiving additional HAE therapy within 4 hours were censored at the time of the medical intervention. The time to significant improvement is not provided in this display as the interquartile range (IQR) was not reached by 4 hours for most episodes.
participantsNUMBER

Results by group40

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Treatment Outcome Score at 4 Hours Post-DoseEcallantide49.5Standard Deviation 59.43units on a scale
Treatment Outcome Score at 4 Hours Post-DosePlacebo18.5Standard Deviation 67.78units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-doseEcallantideMSCS Score at baseline2.17Standard Deviation 0.51units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-dosePlaceboMSCS Score at baseline2.24Standard Deviation 0.55units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-doseEcallantideMSCS Score at 4 hours post-dose1.26Standard Deviation 0.96units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-dosePlaceboMSCS Score at 4 hours post-dose1.75Standard Deviation 0.90units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-doseEcallantideChange from baseline in MSCS at 4 hours post-dose-0.91Standard Deviation 1.10units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Complex Severity (MSCS) Score at 4 Hours Post-dosePlaceboChange from baseline in MSCS at 4 hours post-dose-0.48Standard Deviation 0.68units on a scale
Number of Patients With Symptom Complexes of Treated Attack at Baseline(DOUBLE-BLIND PART)EcallantideInternal Head/Neck Symptoms9participants
Number of Patients With Symptom Complexes of Treated Attack at Baseline(DOUBLE-BLIND PART)PlaceboInternal Head/Neck Symptoms4participants

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double Blind Treatment PeriodSTARTEDEcallantide / Ecallantide36
Double Blind Treatment PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo / Ecallantide36
Double Blind Treatment PeriodSTARTEDEcallantide (Repeat Dose Only)0
Double Blind Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDEcallantide / Ecallantide35
Double Blind Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo / Ecallantide36
Double Blind Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDEcallantide (Repeat Dose Only)0
Double Blind Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDEcallantide / Ecallantide1
Double Blind Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo / Ecallantide0
Double Blind Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDEcallantide (Repeat Dose Only)0
Repeat Dose Treatment PeriodSTARTEDEcallantide / Ecallantide22

Adverse events81

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersDouble Blind - Ecallantide336
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersDouble-Blind Placebo036
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRepeat-Dosing Ecallantide367
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersDouble Blind - Ecallantide436
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersDouble-Blind Placebo236
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersRepeat-Dosing Ecallantide1067
otherHereditary AngioedemaCongenital, familial and genetic disordersDouble Blind - Ecallantide036
otherHereditary AngioedemaCongenital, familial and genetic disordersDouble-Blind Placebo236
otherHereditary AngioedemaCongenital, familial and genetic disordersRepeat-Dosing Ecallantide467
otherNasal CongestionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersDouble Blind - Ecallantide236

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble Blind - Ecallantide
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-Blind Placebo
Total, all-cause mortalityRepeat-Dosing Ecallantide
Total, other adverse eventsDouble Blind - Ecallantide1336
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-Blind Placebo736
Total, other adverse eventsRepeat-Dosing Ecallantide2267
Total, serious adverse eventsDouble Blind - Ecallantide336
Total, serious adverse eventsDouble-Blind Placebo236
Total, serious adverse eventsRepeat-Dosing Ecallantide767

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
20818887DERIVEDPubMed
21130380DERIVEDPubMed
22765833DERIVEDPubMed
23548529DERIVEDPubMed
23878046DERIVEDPubMed
24712435DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00262080

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00262080/results?page=2