ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00274651

A Phase II Clinical Trial of PXD101 in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous and Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas

NCT00274651, Phase 2, Terminated, Valerio Therapeutics; results first posted 2014-10-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Phase II Clinical Trial of PXD101 in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous and Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas. Trials, record NCT00274651. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00274651

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Phase II Clinical Trial of PXD101 in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous and Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas
NCT number
NCT00274651
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
53 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Valerio Therapeutics
Conditions
Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma, Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Interventions
belinostat
First posted
2006-01-11
Last updated
2015-07-28
Results first posted
2014-10-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryObjective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years
Tumor response was assessed using Cheson (Cheson 2007) and SWAT criteria. The SWAT score represents the product of the percentage total body surface area (TBSA) involvement of each lesion type (patch, plaque, and tumor or ulceration), multiplied by a weighting factor.
PrimaryObjective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL))throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 yearsTumor response was assessed using the revised criteria of Cheson (Cheson 2007).Tumor assessments were done using conventional radiographic methods, e.g. CT or CT/PET.
SecondaryTime to Progressionthroughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 yearsTime to progression was defined as the interval between the first date of treatment and the first notation of disease progression.
SecondaryTime to Responsethroughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 yearsTime to response was defined as the interval between the first date of treatment and the first notation of response.
SecondaryDuration of Responsethroughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 yearsDuration of response was defined as the time from first notation of response until the time of first notation of disease progression.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYObjective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years
At termination OR was noted in 1/13 patients (Simon Stage 1). With 29 patients in the CTCL arm the demand for expansion to Simon Stage 2 lacked 5 patients and the study was stopped. Instead OR was done as secondary efficacy analysis (ITT and PP (per protocol)) with OR calculated without accounting for Simon design and with 95% confidence intervals
PRIMARYObjective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL))throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 yearsPrimary efficacy analysis is based on the ITT analysis set, where the OR are calculated, and the proportion ± 80% CI (confidence interval) specified by Koyama \& Chen (2008) are presentedpercentage of patients with ORNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Progressionthroughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years
Time to Progression (ITT population) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for CTCL and PTCL arms. As progression was not observed in six patients in Arm A and 10 patients in Arm B, a total of 37 patients progressed, and the the median time to progression and the full range (days) are presented.
DaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Responsethroughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years
Time to response (ITT population) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for CTCL and PTCL arms. For 4 patients with CTCL and 6 patients with PTCL, response was recorded. The median time to response and the full range (days) are presented.
DaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYDuration of Responsethroughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years
Duration of response (ITT population) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method for CTCL/PTCL arms. 2 CTCL and 2 PTCL patients did not progress and were censored. Median duration of response and full range (days) are presented for 2 patients with CTCL and 4 patients with PTCL. The 2 CTCL patients being evaluable had response durations of 56 and 129 days
DaysMEDIAN
POST_HOCObjective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)throughout the study, or for a maximum of 2 years
At termination OR was noted in 1/13 patients (Simon Stage 1). With 29 patients in the CTCL arm the demand for expansion to Simon Stage 2 lacked 5 patients and the study was stopped. Instead OR was done as secondary efficacy analysis (ITT and PP (per protocol)) with OR calculated without accounting for Simon design and with 95% confidence intervals
participantsNUMBER

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL))PTCL (ITT Population)25percentage of patients with OR
Time to ProgressionArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)43Full Range 15 to 304Days
Time to ProgressionArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)82Full Range 9 to 890Days
Time to ResponseArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)40Full Range 15 to 176Days
Time to ResponseArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)100Full Range 9 to 431Days
Duration of ResponseArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)83Full Range 56 to 129Days
Duration of ResponseArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)109Full Range 7 to 460Days
Objective Response Rate in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population)4participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)29
Overall StudySTARTEDArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)24
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)1
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)28
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)20

Adverse events184

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherFatigueGeneral disordersArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)62911
otherFatigueGeneral disordersArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)82411
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)5299
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)62416
otherInfusion site painGeneral disordersArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)6296
otherInfusion site painGeneral disordersArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)3243
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)6297
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)1241
otherInjection site reactionGeneral disordersArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)0290
otherInjection site reactionGeneral disordersArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)5249

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)
Total, all-cause mortalityArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)
Total, other adverse eventsArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)2929
Total, other adverse eventsArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)2324
Total, serious adverse eventsArm A (CTCL, ITT Population)729
Total, serious adverse eventsArm B (PTCL, ITT Population)824

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
25404094DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Arm A (CTCL, ITT Population) vs Arm B (PTCL, ITT Population): serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00274651

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00274651/events?page=2