ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00283244

Ph II Gemcitabine, Erlotinib, and Gemcitabine With Erlotinib/Elderly Patients W/ IIIB/IV NSCLC

NCT00283244, Phase 2, Completed, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; results first posted 2017-04-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ph II Gemcitabine, Erlotinib, and Gemcitabine With Erlotinib/Elderly Patients W/ IIIB/IV NSCLC. Trials, record NCT00283244. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00283244

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Ph II Gemcitabine, Erlotinib, and Gemcitabine With Erlotinib/Elderly Patients W/ IIIB/IV NSCLC
NCT number
NCT00283244
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
147 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Conditions
Lung Cancer
Interventions
erlotinib hydrochloride, gemcitabine hydrochloride
First posted
2006-01-27
Last updated
2017-04-24
Results first posted
2017-04-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-free SurvivalSix months
We would consider the combination of gemcitabine plus erlotinib or single agent erlotinib to be worthy of further study if there was an increased progressed-free survival. We would use an increase to 45% progression-free survival at 6 months as significant. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
SecondaryResponse RateSix months
The best overall response (BOR) is the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression-recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurement recorded since the treatment started. The response rate was defined as the percentage of patients achieving a BOR of complete response or partial response. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
SecondaryOverall SurvivalUp to 3 yearsSurvival calculated from start of treatment to death from any cause for up to three years.
SecondaryToxicityAfter each cycle/3 weeks, up to 3 years
Assessments for treatment toxicity will be done with each cycle according to CTCAE v3. Results listed here are grade \>=3, treatment related hematologic events (all) and Grade\>=3 treatment related non hematologic events that occurred in \>=5% of patients in any arm. Adverse events (toxicities) are graded on a 5 point scale from 1 (mild) to 5 (lethal), with grades 3 and higher being severe or life threatening.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL)- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung Cancer (FACT-L) Trial Outcome Index-L (TOI-L)After each cycle/3 weeks
The FACT-L is the FACT-G and a lung cancer specific (LCS) subscale given at baseline, after each cycle and at end of treatment. The FACT-G is a 27 item measure of general QOL assessing function in 4 domains: physical well-being (PWB), social-family well-being (SFWB), emotional well-being (EWB) and functional well-being (FWB). Items are rated by patients on a Likert scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores represent better QOL. The TOI-L sums the PWB, FWB, and LCS subscale scores. A best response for TOI-L scores is based on change from baseline and coded as: a change \>=+6 "improved", \<= -6 "worsened" and otherwise "no change". A best overall score response is coded as: Improved (2 visit resp. of "improved" a min. of 28 days apart w/ no interim "worsened") No change (not "improved;" 2 visit resp. of "no change" or "improved" a min. of 28 days apart w/ no interim "worsened") Worsened (not "improved" or "no change;" 2 consecutive "worsened") Other (none of the above)

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-free SurvivalSix monthsmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYResponse RateSix monthspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall SurvivalUp to 3 yearsMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYToxicityAfter each cycle/3 weeks, up to 3 yearsparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYQuality of Life (QOL)- Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung Cancer (FACT-L) Trial Outcome Index-L (TOI-L)After each cycle/3 weeksparticipantsNUMBER

Results by group45

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-free SurvivalArm A (Gemcitabine)3.795% Confidence Interval 2.3 to 4.7months
Progression-free SurvivalArm B (Erlotinib)2.895% Confidence Interval 1.4 to 3.4months
Progression-free SurvivalArm C (Gemcitabine + Erlotinib)4.195% Confidence Interval 2.4 to 5months
Response RateArm A (Gemcitabine)7percentage of participants
Response RateArm B (Erlotinib)0percentage of participants
Response RateArm C (Gemcitabine + Erlotinib)21percentage of participants
Overall SurvivalArm A (Gemcitabine)6.895% Confidence Interval 4.8 to 8.5Months
Overall SurvivalArm B (Erlotinib)5.895% Confidence Interval 3.0 to 8.3Months
Overall SurvivalArm C (Gemcitabine + Erlotinib)5.695% Confidence Interval 3.5 to 8.4Months
ToxicityArm A (Gemcitabine)Anemia (Grade>=3; treatment related)1participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm A (Gemcitabine)44
Overall StudySTARTEDArm B (Erlotinib)51
Overall StudySTARTEDArm C (Gemcitabine + Erlotinib)51
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm A (Gemcitabine)26
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm B (Erlotinib)0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm C (Gemcitabine + Erlotinib)0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm A (Gemcitabine)18
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm B (Erlotinib)51
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm C (Gemcitabine + Erlotinib)51

Adverse events405

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAlbumin, Serum-Low (Hypoalbuminemia)Metabolism and nutrition disordersArm A (Gemcitabine)2442
otherAlbumin, Serum-Low (Hypoalbuminemia)Metabolism and nutrition disordersArm B (Erlotinib)1513
otherAlbumin, Serum-Low (Hypoalbuminemia)Metabolism and nutrition disordersArm C (Gemcitabine + Erlotinib)35110
otherAllergic Reaction/Hypersensitivity (Including Drug Fever)Immune system disordersArm A (Gemcitabine)2442
otherAllergic Reaction/Hypersensitivity (Including Drug Fever)Immune system disordersArm B (Erlotinib)1511
otherAllergic Reaction/Hypersensitivity (Including Drug Fever)Immune system disordersArm C (Gemcitabine + Erlotinib)0510
otherAlt, Sgpt (Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase)InvestigationsArm A (Gemcitabine)0440
otherAlt, Sgpt (Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase)InvestigationsArm B (Erlotinib)0510
otherAlt, Sgpt (Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase)InvestigationsArm C (Gemcitabine + Erlotinib)3514
otherAnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersArm A (Gemcitabine)134417

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm A (Gemcitabine)144
Total, all-cause mortalityArm B (Erlotinib)351
Total, all-cause mortalityArm C (Gemcitabine + Erlotinib)351
Total, other adverse eventsArm A (Gemcitabine)4044
Total, other adverse eventsArm B (Erlotinib)4651
Total, other adverse eventsArm C (Gemcitabine + Erlotinib)4851
Total, serious adverse eventsArm A (Gemcitabine)1644
Total, serious adverse eventsArm B (Erlotinib)1751
Total, serious adverse eventsArm C (Gemcitabine + Erlotinib)2651

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
P30CA016086Cancer Center Support GrantFERRIS, ROBERT L.UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILLNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2025

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00283244

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00283244/results?page=2