ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00293722

Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Etanercept in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Treated by Rheumatologists

NCT00293722, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2014-02-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Etanercept in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Treated by Rheumatologists. Trials, record NCT00293722. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00293722

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Etanercept in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Treated by Rheumatologists
NCT number
NCT00293722
Status
Completed
Enrollment
1,308 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Arthritis, Psoriatic, Psoriasis, Skin Diseases, Papulosquamous
Interventions
Etanercept
First posted
2006-02-17
Last updated
2014-02-26
Results first posted
2014-02-26
Limitations and caveats
Results for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was not reported since it was not to be analyzed by rheumatologists as part of this study, as per planned analysis.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to Week 52
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and Week 52 (end of the observation period) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included SAEs as well as non-serious AEs which occurred during the trial.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Psoriasis at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints Count (DAS 28) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and patient's global assessment (PGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 100 mm; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 total score range: 0-10, where DAS28 less than or equal to (=\<) 3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 \>3.2 to 5.1 = moderate disease activity and \>5.1 = high disease activity.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Ritchie Index at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Ritchie index: the numerical measurement of joint tenderness (28 joints) in participants with arthritis. The number of quantitative evaluations of the pain experienced by the participants when the joints were subjected to firm pressure when exerted over the articular margin or in some instances by passive movement of the joint. Participant's reaction to pressure exerted by the physician were documented on 4-point scale, 0=not tender, 1=tender, 2=tender and caused wince, 3=reflexive effort to withdraw. Ritchie index was calculated as the total of the individual grades for all joints; ranged from 0 to 84, where higher score indicated higher tenderness.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Physician global assessment of disease activity was measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS), with 0 mm = no disease activity to 100 mm = most possible disease activity.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Nail InvolvementBaseline, Week 12, 52Number of participants with psoriatic arthritis affecting the nails are reported.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Itching at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Participants rated the severity of their psoriasis itching on a 0 (none) to 100 (most possible) scale.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Pain at Week 52Baseline, Week 52Participants rated the severity of their psoriatic arthritis-related pain on a 0 (none) to 100 (most possible) scale.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
SF-12 questionnaire was used to determine participants' quality of life (QoL). It comprised 12 items which covered 8 concepts: physical functionality, role impairment due to physical problems, physical pain, perception of general health, vitality, social functionality, role impairment due to emotional problems, and psychological wellbeing. Results were presented in the form of 2 meta-scores, the physical component and the mental component, each ranged from 0 to 100. Higher scores=better QoL, positive changes from baseline=improvement in QoL.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to Week 52Safety analysis set included all participants who were enrolled in this study and had safety data available.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Psoriasis at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Efficacy analysis set included all participants who were greater than (\>) 18 years of age and had confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point.
percentage of BSAMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints Count (DAS 28) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Efficacy analysis set included all participants who were \>18 years of age and had confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Ritchie Index at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Efficacy analysis set included all participants who were \>18 years of age and had confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Efficacy analysis set included all participants who were \>18 years of age and had confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point.
millimeterMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Nail InvolvementBaseline, Week 12, 52
Efficacy analysis set included all participants who were \>18 years of age and had confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Efficacy analysis set included all participants who were \>18 years of age and had confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point.
milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Itching at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Efficacy analysis set included all participants who were \>18 years of age and had confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Pain at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Efficacy analysis set included all participants who were \>18 years of age and had confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Efficacy analysis set included all participants who were \>18 years of age and had confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point.
units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group25

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisAEs38.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisSAEs6.0percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Psoriasis at Week 52Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisBaseline (n=1227)9.7Standard Deviation 15.9percentage of BSA
Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Psoriasis at Week 52Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange at Week 52 (n=796)-6.6Standard Deviation 13.4percentage of BSA
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints Count (DAS 28) at Week 52Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisBaseline (n=1093)4.8Standard Deviation 1.4units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints Count (DAS 28) at Week 52Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange at Week 52 (n=629)-2.2Standard Deviation 1.5units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Ritchie Index at Week 52Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisBaseline (n=1267)9.9Standard Deviation 9.8units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Ritchie Index at Week 52Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange at Week 52 (n=851)-4.1Standard Deviation 11.9units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 52Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisBaseline (n=1278)60.8Standard Deviation 18.8millimeter
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 52Participants With Psoriatic ArthritisChange at Week 52 (n=851)-39.8Standard Deviation 24.2millimeter

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis1,291
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis864
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis427

Adverse events425

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis51,285
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis71,285
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis21,285
otherAngina pectorisCardiac disordersParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis21,285
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis11,285
otherCardiac discomfortCardiac disordersParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis21,285
otherCardiovascular disorderCardiac disordersParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis11,285
otherCyanosisCardiac disordersParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis11,285
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis31,285
otherTachycardiaCardiac disordersParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis11,285

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis
Total, other adverse eventsParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis4531,285
Total, serious adverse eventsParticipants With Psoriatic Arthritis771,285

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
29606665DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00293722

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00293722/results?page=2