ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00296725

Dichotic Listening as a Predictor of Medication Response in Depression

NCT00296725, Phase 1, Phase 2, Completed, New York State Psychiatric Institute; results first posted 2019-05-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Dichotic Listening as a Predictor of Medication Response in Depression. Trials, record NCT00296725. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00296725

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Dichotic Listening as a Predictor of Medication Response in Depression
NCT number
NCT00296725
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
25 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Conditions
Major Depression, Dysthymia, Depressive Disorder Not Otherwise Specified
Interventions
Fluoxetine, Imipramine
First posted
2006-02-27
Last updated
2019-05-30
Results first posted
2019-05-15
Limitations and caveats
Open, non-randomized treatment and ratings; small sample size

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryHamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D)6 weeks
The HAM-D is a commonly used measure of the severity of depression. While several versions exist consisting of different numbers of items, virtually all include the original 17. Each item is scored from on a 3 or 5 point scale (so, from 0-2 or 0-4), with 0 indicating the item is not present and the highest item score indicating it is present nearly all the time to the severest extent. Item scores are added to obtain a total HAM-D score. Minimum possible score is 0 (indicating none of the 17 items is present), maximal possible score is 52. By convention, scores of \<=7 are accepted as indicating "remission" and scores that have decreased \>= 50% from pre-treatment indicate positive "response". Higher scores indicate worse depression, while lower scores indicate milder depression or lack of depressive symptoms.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Positive Response as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impression -Global Improvement Scale (CGI-I)6 weeks.
The CGI consists of two ratings: 1) Global Severity (CGI-S) and 2) Global Improvement (CGI-I), both having seven possible ratings, each from 1-7. Ratings on the CGI-S are: 1="No psychopathology" 2="Minimal psychopathology" 3="Mild psychopathology 4="Moderate psychopathology" 5="Moderately severe psychopathology" 6="Severe psychopathology" 7 "Extreme psychopathology". CGI-I ratings are rated for how the past week's psychopathology compares to the week immediately prior to start of treatment and includes: 1="Very much improved" 2="much improved" 3="minimally improved" 4="Unchanged" 5="minimally worse" 6="much worse" 7="very much worse". Scores on both thus range from 1-7 with lower scores indicating less psychopathology/greater improvement, respectively, and higher scores indicating more psychopathology/less improvement, respectively. We define "response" as a CGI-I of 1 or 2; "nonresponse" is all other ratings (i.e., CGI-I = 3 or higher.

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYHamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D)6 weeksscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Positive Response as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impression -Global Improvement Scale (CGI-I)6 weeks.Response RateParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D)Fluoxetine10Standard Deviation 7score on a scale
Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D)Imipramine9Standard Deviation 7score on a scale
Number of Participants With Positive Response as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impression -Global Improvement Scale (CGI-I)Fluoxetine7Participants
Number of Participants With Positive Response as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impression -Global Improvement Scale (CGI-I)Imipramine4Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Phase 1: Fluoxetine (1-12 Weeks)STARTEDFluoxetine / Imipramine17
Phase 1: Fluoxetine (1-12 Weeks)COMPLETEDFluoxetine / Imipramine12
Phase 1: Fluoxetine (1-12 Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDFluoxetine / Imipramine5
Phase 2: Imipramine (1-6 Weeks)STARTEDFluoxetine / Imipramine8
Phase 2: Imipramine (1-6 Weeks)COMPLETEDFluoxetine / Imipramine7
Phase 2: Imipramine (1-6 Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDFluoxetine / Imipramine1

Adverse events8

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
othershortness of breathRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersFluoxetine1171
othershortness of breathRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersImipramine080
otherirritabilityPsychiatric disordersFluoxetine1171
otherirritabilityPsychiatric disordersImipramine080
otherrashImmune system disordersFluoxetine2172
otherrashImmune system disordersImipramine080
otherlost to follow-upGeneral disordersFluoxetine3173
otherlost to follow-upGeneral disordersImipramine181

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFluoxetine017
Total, all-cause mortalityImipramine08
Total, other adverse eventsFluoxetine717
Total, other adverse eventsImipramine18
Total, serious adverse eventsFluoxetine017
Total, serious adverse eventsImipramine08

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
2306330BACKGROUNDPubMed
8840353BACKGROUNDPubMed
10609436BACKGROUNDPubMed
11274653BACKGROUNDPubMed
15238992BACKGROUNDPubMed
18061147DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Fluoxetine vs Imipramine: Number of Participants With Positive Response as Assessed by the Clinical Global Impression -Global Improvement Scale (CGI-I)Trial comparisons
Fluoxetine vs Imipramine: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Fluoxetine vs Imipramine: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00296725

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00296725/registered