Trial · NCT00299104
Registered outcomes30
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 20 of 30
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) From Screening at Week 52 | Baseline and week 52 | Rate of progression in structural joint damage (PJD) by change in Total Modified Sharp Score (TMSS) from screening to Week 52 in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population. TMSS is the sum of the erosion score (ES) and the joint space narrowing (JSN) score and has a range of 0 to 398. The ES is the sum of joint scores collected for 46 joints and has a range of 0 to 230. The JSN is the sum of joint scores collected for 42 joints and has a range of 0 to 168. A score of 0 would indicate no change and higher scores represent a worsening of joint erosions and joint space narrowing. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp Erosion Score at Week 52 | Baseline and week 52 | Rate of progression in structural joint damage (PJD) by change in modified Sharp erosion score from screening to Week 52. The ES is the sum of joint scores collected for 46 joints and has a range of 0 to 230. A score of 0 would indicate no change and higher scores represent a worsening of joint erosions. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients Without Radiographic Progression at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | Percentage of patients without radiographic progression at Week 52, defined as change in total modified Sharp score (TMSS) \<= 0. TMSS is the sum of the erosion score (ES) and the joint space narrowing (JSN) score and has a range of 0 to 398. The ES is the sum of joint scores collected for 46 joints and has a range of 0 to 230. The JSN is the sum of joint scores collected for 42 joints and has a range of 0 to 168. A score of 0 would indicate no change. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients Without Radiographic Progression in Total Erosion Score at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | No radiographic progression is defined as a change in the total erosion score at Week 52 of less than or equal to zero. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Modified Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score at Week 52 | Baseline and week 52 | Rate of progression in structural joint damage (PJD) by change in modified joint space narrowing (JSN) from screening to Week 52. The JSN is the sum of joint scores collected for 42 joints and has a range of 0 to 168. A score of 0 would indicate no change and higher scores represent a worsening of joint space narrowing. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Modified Total Sharp Score at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | The modified total sharp score is the sum of the erosion score (ES) and the joint space narrowing (JSN) score and has a range of 0 to 398. The ES is the sum of joint scores collected for 46 joints and has a range of 0 to 230. The JSN is the sum of joint scores collected for 42 joints and has a range of 0 to 168. A score of 0 would indicate no change and higher scores represent a worsening of joint erosions and joint space narrowing. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Total Erosion Score at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | Total Erosion Score is determined by evaluation of fourteen sites in each wrist and hand and six joints in each foot using an eight-point scale from 0 (normal: no erosions) to 3.5 (Very severe; erosions of 100% of the articular surfaces. The Total Erosion Score at Week 24 - Total Erosion Score at baseline is calculated. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Modified Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Score at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | Joint Space Narrowing is the sum of joint scores collected for 42 joints and has a range of 0 to 168. A score of 0 would indicate no change and higher scores represent a worsening of joint space narrowing. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Without Radiographic Progression at Week 24 | Baseline, Week 24 | Percentage of patients without radiographic progression at Week 24 defined as change in total modified Sharp score (TMSS) ≤ 0. TMSS is the sum of the erosion score (ES) and the joint space narrowing (JSN) score and has a range of 0 to 398. The ES is the sum of joint scores collected for 46 joints and has a range of 0 to 230. The JSN is the sum of joint scores collected for 42 joints and has a range of 0 to 168. A score of 0 would indicate no change. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR50 Response at Week 52 | Week 52 | To achieve an ACR50 response requires at least a 50% improvement compared with baseline in both Total Joint Count and Swollen Joint Count, as well as a 50% improvement in three of five additional measurements from: * the physician's global assessment of disease activity * patient's global assessment of disease activity * patient's assessment of pain * HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index) * an acute phase reactant C-Reactive Protein (CRP). (If CRP was missing then Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was used if available.) |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | DAS28-ESR is calculated from the following formula: (0.56 \* TJC) + (0.28 \* SJC) + (0.70 \* ln ESR) + (0.014 \* GH) TJC = tender joint count, based on 28 joints SJC = swollen joint count, based on 28 joints ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate in mm/h GH = patient's global assessment of disease activity A DAS28-ESR score of 5.1 or above is considered to indicate high disease activity. Patients can also be defined as having low disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) or remission (DAS28-ESR \< 2.6). |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR70 Response at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | To achieve an ACR70 response requires at least a 70% improvement compared with baseline in both Total Joint Count and Swollen Joint Count, as well as a 70% improvement in three of five additional measurements from: * the physician's global assessment of disease activity * patient's global assessment of disease activity * patient's assessment of pain * HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index) * an acute phase reactant C-Reactive Protein (CRP). (If CRP was missing then Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was used if available.) |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Remission at Week 52 | Week 52 | The DAS28-4(ESR) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR. DAS28-4(ESR) scores range from 0 - 10. Remission is defined as achieving a DAS28-ESR score of less than 2.6 |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity. A good response is defined as an improvement in the DAS28-ESR of \> 1.2 compared with baseline, and attainment of a DAS28-ESR of \< 3.2. |
| Secondary | The Percentage of Participants With Major Clinical Response at Week 52 | Week 52 | Major clinical response is defined as a continuous six-month period of success by the ACR70. ACR70= 70% improvement compared with baseline in both Total Joint Count and Swollen Joint Count, as well as a 70% improvement in 3 of five additional measurements from: * the physician's global assessment of disease activity * patient's global assessment of disease activity * patient's assessment of pain * HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index) * an acute phase reactant C-Reactive Protein (CRP). (If CRP was missing then Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was used if available.) |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With DAS28-ESR Low Disease Activity at Week 52 | Week 52 | The DAS28-4(ESR) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR. DAS28-4(ESR) scores range from 0 - 10. Low disease activity is defined as achieving a DAS28-ESR score of less than or equal to 3.2 |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR20 Response at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | To achieve an ACR20 response requires at least a 20% improvement compared with baseline in both Total Joint Count and Swollen Joint Count, as well as a 20% improvement in three of five additional measurements from: * the physician's global assessment of disease activity * patient's global assessment of disease activity * patient's assessment of pain * HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index) * an acute phase reactant C-Reactive Protein (CRP). (If CRP was missing then Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was used if available.) |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ACR90 Response at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | To achieve an ACR90 response requires at least a 90% improvement compared with baseline in both Total Joint Count and Swollen Joint Count, as well as a 90% improvement in three of five additional measurements from: * the physician's global assessment of disease activity * patient's global assessment of disease activity * patient's assessment of pain * HAQ-DI (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index) * an acute phase reactant C-Reactive Protein (CRP). (If CRP was missing then Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was used if available.) |
| Secondary | Change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score From Baseline at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the patient's health status. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip,and common daily activities. Each domain has at least two component questions. There are four possible responses for each component ranging from 0(without any difficulty) to 4 (unable to do).HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00299104/registered