ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00308087

Comparison Study of Rituximab Plus Sargramostim to Rituximab Alone for Relapsed Follicular B-cell Lymphoma, a Form of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

NCT00308087, Phase 2, Terminated, Genzyme, a Sanofi Company; results first posted 2010-08-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparison Study of Rituximab Plus Sargramostim to Rituximab Alone for Relapsed Follicular B-cell Lymphoma, a Form of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Trials, record NCT00308087. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00308087

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparison Study of Rituximab Plus Sargramostim to Rituximab Alone for Relapsed Follicular B-cell Lymphoma, a Form of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
NCT number
NCT00308087
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
75 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Conditions
Lymphoma, Follicular
Interventions
Sargramostim (Leukine), Rituximab
First posted
2006-03-29
Last updated
2013-12-27
Results first posted
2010-08-30
Limitations and caveats
One hundred ninety-six patients were planned and 75 enrolled prior to termination. The study was terminated early due to low enrollment, and the extent of changes needed to the protocol to keep pace with therapeutic changes for indolent lymphoma.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With a Complete Response or Unconfirmed Complete Response at Week 8 With Confirmation at Week 12Week 8 (confirmed at Week 12)
Count of number of participants who responded with a Complete Response (complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiological evidence of disease) at week 8 and again clinically and radiologically confirmed at week 12.
SecondarySummary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)up to 12 weeks
Count of the number of participants who experienced treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). TEAEs occurred during the time study intervention was being taken occurring on or after Day 1 and no longer than 30 days after the last dose of study medication.
SecondaryParticipant Summary of Best Response Across All Visitsup to 24 months
Count of participants' best response within categories defined by the International Working Group (IWG): \> Complete Response (complete disappearance of detectable clinical and radiological evidence of disease), \> Complete Response Unconfirmed (unconfirmed complete disappearance), \> Partial Response (\>=50% decrease sum of the product of the greatest diameters in the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses), \> Stable Disease (neither response nor disease progression), \> Progression (new lesion or increase by 50% of previously involved sites from nadir).
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-Free Survival24 monthsTime to event was measured from the date of randomization to the date of first progressive disease (PD) or death.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Partial Response or Better to Treatment24 months
Count of days in which a participant experiences a Partial Response (\>=50% decrease sum of the product of the greatest diameters in the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses) or better. Time to event was measured from the date of response to the date of progressive disease (PD) or death.
SecondarySummary of Cost Effectiveness24 months
A cost-effectiveness analysis from the payer perspective was to be performed. Only direct medical costs for each patient during the study period were to be included for analysis. Costs were to be calculated by multiplying each health care resource unit by the amount reimbursed by a payer. Health care resource utilization units are a way to normalize the quantity of health care provided to each participant so that costs can be compared.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With a Complete Response or Unconfirmed Complete Response at Week 8 With Confirmation at Week 12Week 8 (confirmed at Week 12)Intent to treat populationparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSummary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)up to 12 weeksSafety populationparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYParticipant Summary of Best Response Across All Visitsup to 24 monthsIntent to treat populationparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-Free Survival24 monthsIntent to treat populationDaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Partial Response or Better to Treatment24 monthsIntent to treat population.DaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYSummary of Cost Effectiveness24 monthsNo participants were analyzed because the study was terminated early due to low enrollment.

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With a Complete Response or Unconfirmed Complete Response at Week 8 With Confirmation at Week 12Rituximab1participants
Number of Participants With a Complete Response or Unconfirmed Complete Response at Week 8 With Confirmation at Week 12Rituximab + Sargramostim3participants
Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)RituximabPatients with TEAEs34participants
Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Rituximab + SargramostimPatients with TEAEs38participants
Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)RituximabPatients with Treatment-Related TEAEs21participants
Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Rituximab + SargramostimPatients with Treatment-Related TEAEs37participants
Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)RituximabNumber of Deaths0participants
Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Rituximab + SargramostimNumber of Deaths0participants
Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)RituximabPatients with Serious TEAEs4participants
Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)Rituximab + SargramostimPatients with Serious TEAEs4participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRituximab37
Overall StudySTARTEDRituximab + Sargramostim38
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRituximab1
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRituximab + Sargramostim1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRituximab36
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRituximab + Sargramostim37

Adverse events356

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab037
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab + Sargramostim138
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab037
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab + Sargramostim338
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab137
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab + Sargramostim238
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab237
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab + Sargramostim038
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab037
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRituximab + Sargramostim338

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRituximab
Total, all-cause mortalityRituximab + Sargramostim
Total, other adverse eventsRituximab3337
Total, other adverse eventsRituximab + Sargramostim3838
Total, serious adverse eventsRituximab537
Total, serious adverse eventsRituximab + Sargramostim738

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Rituximab vs Rituximab + Sargramostim: Number of Participants With a Complete Response or Unconfirmed Complete Response at Week 8 With Confirmation at Week 12Trial comparisons
Rituximab vs Rituximab + Sargramostim: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00308087

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00308087/results?page=2