ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00316888

Cetuximab, Cisplatin, Fluorouracil, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Anal Cancer

NCT00316888, Phase 2, Completed, ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group; results first posted 2016-08-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Cetuximab, Cisplatin, Fluorouracil, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Anal Cancer. Trials, record NCT00316888. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00316888

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Cetuximab, Cisplatin, Fluorouracil, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Anal Cancer
NCT number
NCT00316888
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
63 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Conditions
Anal Cancer
Interventions
cetuximab, cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy
First posted
2006-04-21
Last updated
2023-06-29
Results first posted
2016-08-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryLocal Failure Rate at 3 Yearsassessed every 3 months for patients within 2 years of registration, then every 6 months for patients in year 3
Local failure was defined as progression/relapse of disease in the anal canal and/or regional organs and/or regional lymph nodes after completion of protocol therapy, or progression during protocol therapy. Lost to follow-up and death (regardless of cause of death) prior to 3 years were also considered as local failures. For the calculation of local failure rate at 3 years, patients were classified into two groups (ie, coded as binary variable): failure (patients with local failure events prior to 3 years) vs. no failure (patients who still alive and had no local failure at 3 years). The binomial proportion and its exact two-sided 80% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate it.
Secondary3-year Overall Survival Rateassessed every 3 months for patients within 2 years of registration, then every 6 months for patients in year 3Overall survival (OS) is defined as time from registration to death from any cause. Patients alive are censored at the last contact date. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 3-year OS rate.
Secondary3-year Progression-free Survival Rateassessed every 3 months for patients within 2 years of registration, then every 6 months for patients in year 3
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from registration to disease progression, relapse or death (whichever occurred first), censoring cases without PFS events at the date of last disease assessment documenting the patient was free of progression/relapse. Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 3-year PFS rate.
SecondaryObjective Response Rate
Tumor assessments were made at baseline, within 4 weeks of the completion of protocol treatment, then every 6 months if patient was 1-4 years from registration, yearly if patient was 5-10 years from registration until progression/relapse using the RECIST
Objective response rate is defined as number of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by all eligible and treated patients. Responses are evaluated using the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline. CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), and/or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s).
Secondary3-year Colostomy-free Survival Rateassessed every 3 months for patients within 2 years of registration, then every 6 months for patients in year 3
Colostomy-free survival was defined as time from registration until time of colostomy or death without colostomy, censoring cases without colostomy at the data of last disease assessment documenting the patient was free of colostomy. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 3-year colostomy-free survival rate.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYLocal Failure Rate at 3 Yearsassessed every 3 months for patients within 2 years of registration, then every 6 months for patients in year 3eligible and treated patientsproportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARY3-year Overall Survival Rateassessed every 3 months for patients within 2 years of registration, then every 6 months for patients in year 3eligible and treated patientsproportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARY3-year Progression-free Survival Rateassessed every 3 months for patients within 2 years of registration, then every 6 months for patients in year 3eligible and treated patientsproportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYObjective Response Rate
Tumor assessments were made at baseline, within 4 weeks of the completion of protocol treatment, then every 6 months if patient was 1-4 years from registration, yearly if patient was 5-10 years from registration until progression/relapse using the RECIST
eligible and treated patientsproportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARY3-year Colostomy-free Survival Rateassessed every 3 months for patients within 2 years of registration, then every 6 months for patients in year 3eligible and treated patients who did not have permanent colostomy at study entryproportion of participantsNUMBER

Results by group10

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Local Failure Rate at 3 YearsArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)0.25980% Confidence Interval 0.150 to 0.397proportion of participants
Local Failure Rate at 3 YearsArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)0.35380% Confidence Interval 0.243 to 0.477proportion of participants
3-year Overall Survival RateArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)0.88795% Confidence Interval 0.690 to 0.962proportion of participants
3-year Overall Survival RateArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)0.78995% Confidence Interval 0.606 to 0.893proportion of participants
3-year Progression-free Survival RateArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)0.80995% Confidence Interval 0.600 to 0.916proportion of participants
3-year Progression-free Survival RateArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)0.61695% Confidence Interval 0.432 to 0.756proportion of participants
Objective Response RateArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)0.63095% Confidence Interval 0.424 to 0.806proportion of participants
Objective Response RateArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)0.64795% Confidence Interval 0.465 to 0.802proportion of participants
3-year Colostomy-free Survival RateArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)0.84995% Confidence Interval 0.645 to 0.940proportion of participants
3-year Colostomy-free Survival RateArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)0.65795% Confidence Interval 0.446 to 0.804proportion of participants

Participant flow14

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)28
Overall StudySTARTEDArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)35
Overall StudyEligibleArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)28
Overall StudyEligibleArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)35
Overall StudyTreatedArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)28
Overall StudyTreatedArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)34
Overall StudyStarted Induction ChemotherapyArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)28
Overall StudyStarted Induction ChemotherapyArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)0
Overall StudyStarted Chemo+Radiation+CetuximabArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)27
Overall StudyStarted Chemo+Radiation+CetuximabArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)34

Adverse events250

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)328
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)134
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)1128
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)1234
otherLeukocytes decreasedInvestigationsArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)1528
otherLeukocytes decreasedInvestigationsArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)1134
otherLymphopeniaInvestigationsArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)228
otherLymphopeniaInvestigationsArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)134
otherNeutrophils decreasedInvestigationsArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)1128
otherNeutrophils decreasedInvestigationsArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)734

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)
Total, all-cause mortalityArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)
Total, other adverse eventsArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)2828
Total, other adverse eventsArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)3434
Total, serious adverse eventsArm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008)2628
Total, serious adverse eventsArm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009)2934

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
U10CA023318ECOG Statistical OfficeGRAY, ROBERT JDANA-FARBER CANCER INSTNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2013

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Arm I (Closed to Accrual as of 11/3/2008) vs Arm II (Open to Accrual on 8/18/2009): serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00316888

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00316888/events?page=2