ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00322153

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Memantine in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer's Disease

NCT00322153, Phase 3, Completed, Forest Laboratories; results first posted 2010-09-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Memantine in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer's Disease. Trials, record NCT00322153. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00322153

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Memantine in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer's Disease
NCT number
NCT00322153
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
677 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Forest Laboratories
Conditions
Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type
Interventions
memantine ER, Placebo
First posted
2006-05-05
Last updated
2010-09-16
Results first posted
2010-09-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) at Week 24 (LOCF)Baseline to week 24
The SIB was developed for the evaluation of cognitive function in patients with more advanced dementia, and evaluates the areas of memory, language, praxis, orientation, and attention. The SIB test items consist of simple, one-step commands presented with gestural cues that are repeated if necessary. The test contains 51 items, and the range of possible scores is 0 to 100 (with 0 being the worst result). The SIB has been shown to be a valid and reliable instrument sensitive to longitudinal change.
PrimaryClinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change With Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus) at Week 24 (LOCF)Week 24
The CIBIC-Plus is a measure of an overall clinical effect and is based on a comprehensive evaluation at Baseline and later visits of four domains: general (overall clinical status), functional (including activities of daily living), cognitive, and behavioral. A skilled clinician interviews the patient, and includes information supplied by a knowledgeable caregiver. The CIBIC-Plus is a rating of the patient's global status relative to Baseline, ranging from a score of 1, indicating "marked improvement" to a score of 4, indicating "no change" to a score of 7, indicating "marked worsening."
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the 19-Item Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL19) Scale at Week 24 (LOCF)Baseline to week 24
The ADCS-ADL19 modified inventory consists of 19 items used to measure the functional capabilities of patients with moderate to severe dementia. Each activity-of-daily-living (ADL) item comprises a series of hierarchical subquestions ranging from the highest level of independent performance to complete loss of ability to perform the ADL Inventory. The inventory is performed by interviewing a person in close contact with the patient and covers the most usual and consistent performance of the patient over the preceding 4 weeks. Response range is 0 (total disability) to 54 (total independence).

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) at Week 24 (LOCF)Baseline to week 24
Primary efficacy analysis was based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population. The ITT Population was consisted of all patients in the Safety Population who completed at least one post-Baseline efficacy assessment in SIB or CIBIC-Plus. The last-observation-carried-forward approach was used to impute missing post-Baseline values.
Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYClinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change With Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus) at Week 24 (LOCF)Week 24
Primary efficacy analysis was based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population. The ITT Population was consisted of all patients in the Safety Population who completed at least one post-Baseline efficacy assessment in SIB or CIBIC-Plus. The last-observation-carried-forward approach was used to impute missing post-Baseline values.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the 19-Item Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL19) Scale at Week 24 (LOCF)Baseline to week 24The secondary efficacy analysis was based on the ITT Population. The last-observation-carried-forward approach was used to impute missing post-Baseline values.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group6

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) at Week 24 (LOCF)Placebo-0.4Standard Error 0.65Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) at Week 24 (LOCF)Memantine ER2.2Standard Error 0.65Units on a scale
Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change With Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus) at Week 24 (LOCF)Placebo4.1Standard Error 0.07Units on a scale
Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change With Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus) at Week 24 (LOCF)Memantine ER3.8Standard Error 0.07Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the 19-Item Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL19) Scale at Week 24 (LOCF)Placebo-1.7Standard Error 0.44Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in the 19-Item Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL19) Scale at Week 24 (LOCF)Memantine ER-1.0Standard Error 0.44Units on a scale

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo335
Overall StudySTARTEDMemantine ER342
Overall StudySAFETY POPULATIONPlacebo335
Overall StudySAFETY POPULATIONMemantine ER341
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo272
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMemantine ER273
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo63
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMemantine ER69

Adverse events122

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherFallInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsPlacebo26335
otherFallInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsMemantine ER19341
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo24335
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsMemantine ER19341
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo17335
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersMemantine ER19341
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo13335
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersMemantine ER17341
seriousAtrioventricular block completeCardiac disordersPlacebo0335
seriousAtrioventricular block completeCardiac disordersMemantine ER1341

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityMemantine ER
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo70335
Total, other adverse eventsMemantine ER67341
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo21335
Total, serious adverse eventsMemantine ER28341

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
29771687DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Memantine ER vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00322153

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00322153/events?page=2