ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00322439

Observational Safety Study of Etanercept (Enbrel) for Treatment of Psoriasis

NCT00322439, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2014-03-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Observational Safety Study of Etanercept (Enbrel) for Treatment of Psoriasis. Trials, record NCT00322439. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00322439

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Observational Safety Study of Etanercept (Enbrel) for Treatment of Psoriasis
NCT number
NCT00322439
Status
Completed
Enrollment
2,511 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Psoriasis
Interventions
Etanercept
First posted
2006-05-08
Last updated
2018-06-28
Results first posted
2014-03-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryFive-year Cumulative Incidence of Serious Adverse Events and Serious Infectious Events5 years
A serious adverse event (SAE), including a serious infectious event (SIE), is defined as one that suggests a significant hazard or side effect, regardless of the investigator or sponsor's opinion on the relationship to a drug product. This includes, but may not be limited to, any event that (at any dose) is fatal, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization that includes a minimum of an overnight stay or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Cumulative incidences were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology for all participants who received at least 1 registry dose of etanercept. For SAEs and SIEs, time to event was re-defined from calendar time to cumulative time up to the event, excluding time intervals and events when the participant was not on etanercept treatment (ie, based on etenercept exposure time).
SecondaryFive-year Cumulative Incidence for Events of Medical Interest (EMIs)5 years
Protocol defined EMIs included: • All malignancies, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC); • Tuberculosis; • Opportunistic infections treated with intravenous therapy; • Histoplasmosis infections treated with oral antibiotics; • Coccidioidomycosis infections treated with oral antibiotics; • Central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disorders; • Lupus disease; • Coronary artery disease; • Worsening of psoriasis as defined by change in psoriasis morphology and withdrawal of therapy; • Any event or laboratory abnormality that represents an event of medical significance. Cumulative incidences were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods where time to event was defined as the time from the first dose of etanercept to the start date of the first occurrence of the event, regardless of exposure (ie, based on observation time). Estimates were adjusted using left truncation methodology to help address any bias due to participants with prior etanercept exposure.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of Psoriasis Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear)Baseline and at 3 and 5 years
The sPGA scale is designed to evaluate the physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA is assessed on a scale of 0 to 5 (0 = clear, 5 = severe).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Patient's Global Assessment of Psoriasis Score of 0 or 1Baseline and at 3 and 5 yearsThe patient's global assessment of psoriasis is a self-administered numeric scale is designed to evaluate participants' perception of their psoriasis on a scale from 0 (good) to 5 (severe).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ResponseBaseline, Year 3 and Year 5
The DLQI questionnaire asks participants to evaluate the degree that psoriasis has affected their quality of life in the last week, and includes the following parameters: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure activities, work or school activities, personal relationships and treatment related feelings. Participants answer 10 questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); the range of the total score is 0 to 30. A score of 21 to 30 means an extremely large effect on the participant's life whereas 0-1 means that the disease has no effect at all. A DLQI response is defined as a 5 point improvement from Baseline or a score of 0.
SecondaryEuroqol-5D (EQ-5D) Total ScoreBaseline, Year 3 and Year 5
EQ-5D is a self-reported questionnaire that consists of five single-item health domains, mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The answers are recorded as choices of 1, 2, or 3 for each question, with 1 signifying no problem, 2 signifying some problem, and 3 signifying major problem. Using the US scoring algorithm, the possible total EQ-5D score ranges from -0.11 (ie, answered '3' for all questions) to 1.0 (ie, answered '1' for all questions), where 1.0 represents perfect health.
SecondaryEuroqol-5D (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline, Year 3 and Year 5
The EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) is a 100 mm scale with 100 representing 'best imaginable health state' and 0 representing 'worst imaginable health state'. Participants were asked to indicate on this scale how good or bad their health was today.
SecondaryHealthcare Resource UseBaseline, Year 3 and Year 5
This self-administered questionnaire is designed to measure the amount of healthcare resource utilization by the participant in the past 4 weeks. The average answers to the following questions are reported: 1. How many times have you been to any physician's office or urgent care clinic, not including your dermatologist? 2. How many times have you seen a nurse practitioner, physician assistant, psychologist, naturopath, acupuncturist, or chiropractor? 3. How many times have you received care from a health professional (HP) in your home? 4. How many times have you paid someone to help you do chores around the house (cleaning, maintenance, lawn care)? 5. How many times have you had a friend or family member take time off work to provide care or transportation?
SecondaryWork Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Baseline, Year 3 and Year 5
The WPAI questionnaire has six questions to assess whether the participant was currently employed (Q1); how many hours from work were missed due to problems associated with psoriasis (Q2) or any other reason (Q3); hours actually worked (Q4); degree that psoriasis affected productivity while working (Q5); and degree that psoriasis affected regular activities (Q6) over the past 7 days. Four separate overall scores were calculated, including absenteeism (work time missed due to health), presenteeism (impairment at work due to health), work productivity loss (overall work impairment due to health), and activity impairment due to health. Each score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity (ie, worse outcomes).
SecondaryPercentage of Body Surface Area Affected by PsoriasisBaseline, Year 3 and Year 5Body Surface Area (BSA) is a numerical score used to measure the physician's assessment of the percentage of the participant's total BSA involved with psoriasis.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYFive-year Cumulative Incidence of Serious Adverse Events and Serious Infectious Events5 yearsproportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYFive-year Cumulative Incidence for Events of Medical Interest (EMIs)5 yearsFull analysis setproportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) of Psoriasis Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear)Baseline and at 3 and 5 years
Participants who received at least one registry dose of etanercept, excluding participants who were enrolled at sites that were closed for cause, and with available data at each time point (indicated by n).
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Patient's Global Assessment of Psoriasis Score of 0 or 1Baseline and at 3 and 5 years
Participants who received at least one registry dose of etanercept, excluding participants who were enrolled at sites that were closed for cause, and with available data at each time point (indicated by n).
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ResponseBaseline, Year 3 and Year 5
Participants who received at least one registry dose of etanercept, excluding participants who were enrolled at sites that were closed for cause, and with available data at each time point (indicated by n).
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEuroqol-5D (EQ-5D) Total ScoreBaseline, Year 3 and Year 5
Participants who received at least one registry dose of etanercept, excluding participants who were enrolled at sites that were closed for cause, and with available data at each time point (indicated by n).
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYEuroqol-5D (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline, Year 3 and Year 5
Participants who received at least one registry dose of etanercept, excluding participants who were enrolled at sites that were closed for cause, and with available data at each time point (indicated by n).
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYHealthcare Resource UseBaseline, Year 3 and Year 5
Participants who received at least one registry dose of etanercept, excluding participants who were enrolled at sites that were closed for cause, and with available data at each time point (indicated by n).
timesMEAN
SECONDARYWork Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)Baseline, Year 3 and Year 5
Participants who received at least one registry dose of etanercept, excluding participants who were enrolled at sites that were closed for cause, and with available data at each time point (indicated by n), and who were employed (for the first 3 scores).
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Body Surface Area Affected by PsoriasisBaseline, Year 3 and Year 5
Participants who received at least one registry dose of etanercept, excluding participants who were enrolled at sites that were closed for cause, and with available data at each time point (indicated by n).
percentage of body surface areaMEAN

Results by group55

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Five-year Cumulative Incidence of Serious Adverse Events and Serious Infectious EventsEtanerceptSerious Adverse Events0.202995% Confidence Interval 0.1799 to 0.2260proportion of participants
Five-year Cumulative Incidence of Serious Adverse Events and Serious Infectious EventsEtanerceptSerious Infectious Events0.058195% Confidence Interval 0.0447 to 0.0716proportion of participants
Five-year Cumulative Incidence for Events of Medical Interest (EMIs)EtanerceptMalignancy, including BCC, SCC and lymphoma0.065995% Confidence Interval 0.0538 to 0.0780proportion of participants
Five-year Cumulative Incidence for Events of Medical Interest (EMIs)EtanerceptCoronary artery disease0.028395% Confidence Interval 0.0202 to 0.0364proportion of participants
Five-year Cumulative Incidence for Events of Medical Interest (EMIs)EtanerceptWorsening of psoriasis0.007495% Confidence Interval 0.0032 to 0.0115proportion of participants
Five-year Cumulative Incidence for Events of Medical Interest (EMIs)EtanerceptCNS demyelinating disorder0.001895% Confidence Interval -0.0002 to 0.0039proportion of participants
Five-year Cumulative Incidence for Events of Medical Interest (EMIs)EtanerceptTuberculosis0.001395% Confidence Interval -0.0005 to 0.0030proportion of participants
Five-year Cumulative Incidence for Events of Medical Interest (EMIs)EtanerceptLupus disease0.000695% Confidence Interval -0.0006 to 0.0018proportion of participants
Five-year Cumulative Incidence for Events of Medical Interest (EMIs)EtanerceptOpportunistic infection0.000695% Confidence Interval -0.0006 to 0.0018proportion of participants
Five-year Cumulative Incidence for Events of Medical Interest (EMIs)EtanerceptCoccidioidomycosisNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAproportion of participants

Participant flow4

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEtanercept2,511
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of EtanerceptEtanercept2,510
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEtanercept1,455
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEtanercept1,056

Adverse events366

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEtanercept32,510
seriousHaemorrhagic AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEtanercept12,510
seriousLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersEtanercept22,510
seriousLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEtanercept12,510
seriousPancytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEtanercept22,510
seriousThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEtanercept12,510
seriousAcute Coronary SyndromeCardiac disordersEtanercept32,510
seriousAcute Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disordersEtanercept32,510
seriousAngina PectorisCardiac disordersEtanercept82,510
seriousAngina UnstableCardiac disordersEtanercept12,510

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEtanercept
Total, other adverse eventsEtanercept02,510
Total, serious adverse eventsEtanercept4182,510

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
23357569BACKGROUNDPubMed
24251402BACKGROUNDPubMed
25264239BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00322439

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00322439/results?page=2