ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00336284

TRUST: Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-up

NCT00336284, Phase 4, Completed, Biotronik, Inc.; results first posted 2010-03-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. TRUST: Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-up. Trials, record NCT00336284. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00336284

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
TRUST: Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-up
NCT number
NCT00336284
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
1,450 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Biotronik, Inc.
Conditions
Patient Indicated for an ICD
Interventions
Home Monitoring, In-Office Conventional Follow-up
First posted
2006-06-13
Last updated
2010-08-03
Results first posted
2010-03-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryHome Monitoring Effectiveness12 monthsAverage number of office-based implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) follow-up visits in the Home Monitoring arm vs the Conventional (calendar-based) follow-up arm.
PrimaryPercent of Participants Experiencing Death, Incidence of Stroke, or Event Requiring Surgical Intervention.12 monthsPercentage of participants experiencing death, incidence of stroke, or event(s) requiring surgical intervention. Outcome measure time frame is 12 months.
SecondaryEarly Detection of Cardiac Events12 monthsDetection time relative to onset of cardiac events (atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation).
SecondaryPatient Initiated Follow-up12 monthsPercentage of total patient initiated inqueries that result in ER or office follow-up visits.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYHome Monitoring Effectiveness12 monthsOnly participants who completed at least one follow-up visit are included in the analyses.In-office ICD follow-up per patient yearMEAN
PRIMARYPercent of Participants Experiencing Death, Incidence of Stroke, or Event Requiring Surgical Intervention.12 monthsSafety Event Rate includes events occuring within 12 months of enrollment for participants with at least 1 follow-up.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEarly Detection of Cardiac Events12 monthsOnly participants with at least one follow-up are included in the analyses.DaysMEAN
SECONDARYPatient Initiated Follow-up12 monthsOnly participants with at least one follow-up are included in the analysespercent of patient initiated follow-upsNUMBER

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Home Monitoring EffectivenessHome Monitoring2.1Full Range 0 to 45.6In-office ICD follow-up per patient year
Home Monitoring EffectivenessConventional3.8Full Range 0 to 19.2In-office ICD follow-up per patient year
Percent of Participants Experiencing Death, Incidence of Stroke, or Event Requiring Surgical Intervention.Home Monitoring10.4Percentage of participants
Percent of Participants Experiencing Death, Incidence of Stroke, or Event Requiring Surgical Intervention.Conventional10.4Percentage of participants
Early Detection of Cardiac EventsHome Monitoring13.98Full Range 0 to 256Days
Early Detection of Cardiac EventsConventional45.34Full Range 0 to 287Days
Patient Initiated Follow-upHome Monitoring92.7percent of patient initiated follow-ups
Patient Initiated Follow-upConventional100percent of patient initiated follow-ups

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDHome Monitoring977
Overall StudySTARTEDConventional473
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDHome Monitoring741
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDConventional322
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDHome Monitoring236
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDConventional151

Adverse events32

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousAblation procedureSurgical and medical proceduresHome Monitoring59775
seriousAblation procedureSurgical and medical proceduresConventional44734
seriousAborted upgrade procedureSurgical and medical proceduresHome Monitoring09770
seriousAborted upgrade procedureSurgical and medical proceduresConventional14731
seriousCardiac related hospitalizationsCardiac disordersHome Monitoring4597764
seriousCardiac related hospitalizationsCardiac disordersConventional3147335
seriousCatheterization/PCI procedureSurgical and medical proceduresHome Monitoring1597716
seriousCatheterization/PCI procedureSurgical and medical proceduresConventional34734
seriousCoronary artery bypass graft procedureSurgical and medical proceduresHome Monitoring39773
seriousCoronary artery bypass graft procedureSurgical and medical proceduresConventional04730

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityHome Monitoring
Total, all-cause mortalityConventional
Total, other adverse eventsHome Monitoring0977
Total, other adverse eventsConventional0473
Total, serious adverse eventsHome Monitoring124977
Total, serious adverse eventsConventional74473

Papers8

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
20625110RESULTPubMed
20716717DERIVEDPubMed
23258817DERIVEDPubMed
24595864DERIVEDPubMed
26661687DERIVEDPubMed
29016878DERIVEDPubMed
33640345DERIVEDPubMed
36503177DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Home Monitoring vs Conventional: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00336284

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00336284/events?page=2