ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00363298

Dextro-Amphetamine Versus Caffeine in Treatment-resistant OCD

NCT00363298, Not applicable, Completed, Stanford University; results first posted 2017-03-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Dextro-Amphetamine Versus Caffeine in Treatment-resistant OCD. Trials, record NCT00363298. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00363298

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Dextro-Amphetamine Versus Caffeine in Treatment-resistant OCD
NCT number
NCT00363298
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
24 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Conditions
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Interventions
dextro-amphetamine, Sham Comparison
First posted
2006-08-15
Last updated
2017-03-28
Results first posted
2017-03-28
Limitations and caveats
Modest sample size of 24 subjects, 12 in each drug group. Observation period was only 5 weeks long.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Subjects With Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Score of 1 or 2At end of week 5, except 1 d-amphetamine subject rated at end of week 2
Clinical Global Impressions Scale Improvement Score = 1 (very much improved), or 2 (much improved). Additional possible scale scores are 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse) and 7 (very much worse).
PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) ScoreAt end of week 5, except 1 d-amphetamine subject rated at end of week 2
Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score by blinded investigator in direct interview. The scale score is the sum of ten items (5 for obsessions and 5 for compulsions: time occupied, degree of interference with functioning, degree of distress, effort to resist the symptom, success in resisting), each rated from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe OCD. Maximum score is 40. Scores of 14 and below are often described as "subclinical," though patients with these scores may still exhibit troubling symptoms and mild to moderate distress. A total score of 8 or less is often termed "remission." A decrease in total score from baseline to endpoint of either 25% or 35% is often used as a "responder" criterion in clinical trials.

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Subjects With Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Score of 1 or 2At end of week 5, except 1 d-amphetamine subject rated at end of week 2Subjects who met the study continuation phase entry criterion of \>20% decrease in Y-BOCS score after 1 week of double-blind study medication, and entered this 4-week double-blind continuation phaseparticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYYale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) ScoreAt end of week 5, except 1 d-amphetamine subject rated at end of week 2
Subjects who entered the 4-week double-blind study continuation phase, including a last observation carried forward for the one d-amphetamine subject who dropped out of this phase at the end of study week 2 (end of the first week of the continuation phase) for lack of efficacy.
units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Subjects With Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Score of 1 or 2D-amphetamine6participants
Number of Subjects With Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Score of 1 or 2Caffeine Pills7participants
Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) ScoreD-amphetamine13.3Standard Deviation 6.9units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) ScoreCaffeine Pills13.0Standard Deviation 8.4units on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
First Study WeekSTARTEDD-amphetamine12
First Study WeekSTARTEDCaffeine Pills12
First Study WeekCOMPLETEDD-amphetamine6
First Study WeekCOMPLETEDCaffeine Pills7
First Study WeekNOT COMPLETEDD-amphetamine6
First Study WeekNOT COMPLETEDCaffeine Pills5
4-week Study Continuation PhaseSTARTEDD-amphetamine6
4-week Study Continuation PhaseSTARTEDCaffeine Pills7
4-week Study Continuation PhaseCOMPLETEDD-amphetamine5
4-week Study Continuation PhaseCOMPLETEDCaffeine Pills7

Adverse events14

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherinsomniaPsychiatric disordersD-amphetamine212
otherinsomniaPsychiatric disordersCaffeine Pills212
otherdry mouthGastrointestinal disordersD-amphetamine212
otherdry mouthGastrointestinal disordersCaffeine Pills012
otherdecreased appetiteGastrointestinal disordersD-amphetamine112
otherdecreased appetiteGastrointestinal disordersCaffeine Pills012
othernauseaGastrointestinal disordersD-amphetamine012
othernauseaGastrointestinal disordersCaffeine Pills112
otherintermittent jitterinessNervous system disordersD-amphetamine012
otherintermittent jitterinessNervous system disordersCaffeine Pills112

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityD-amphetamine
Total, all-cause mortalityCaffeine Pills
Total, other adverse eventsD-amphetamine512
Total, other adverse eventsCaffeine Pills412
Total, serious adverse eventsD-amphetamine012
Total, serious adverse eventsCaffeine Pills012

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
19573497RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
D-amphetamine vs Caffeine Pills: Number of Subjects With Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Score of 1 or 2Trial comparisons
D-amphetamine vs Caffeine Pills: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00363298

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00363298/registered