ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00367133

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema

NCT00367133, Phase 3, Completed, Jaeb Center for Health Research; results first posted 2010-07-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema. Trials, record NCT00367133. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00367133

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT number
NCT00367133
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
840 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Conditions
Diabetic Macular Edema
Interventions
Standard of Care Group, 1mg triamcinolone acetonide, 4mg triamcinolone acetonide
First posted
2006-08-22
Last updated
2016-08-26
Results first posted
2010-07-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years.Baseline to 2 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0.
PrimaryMedian Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 YearsBaseline to 2 Years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement.
PrimaryDistribution of Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Yearsbaseline to 2 years
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method.
SecondaryCentral Subfield Thickness at 2 Years2 Years
Median central subfield thickness at two-years. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
SecondaryMean Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 YearsBaseline to 2 years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes and improvement.
SecondaryMedian Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 YearsBaseline to 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement.
SecondaryOverall Central Subfield Thickening Decreased by >=50% Baseline to 2 YearsBaseline to 2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
SecondaryCentral Subfield Thickness < 250 Microns at 2 Years2 Years
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield.
SecondaryChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 YearsBaseline to 3 year
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement.
SecondaryChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 YearsBaseline to 3 year
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best Value on the scale=97, Worst Value=0

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years.Baseline to 2 YearsThe primary analysis included all randomized eyes and followed the intent-to-treat principle.Letter scoreMEAN
SECONDARYCentral Subfield Thickness at 2 Years2 YearsOnly subjects with an available Optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and 2 years are included in the OCT analysis.MicronsMEDIAN
PRIMARYMedian Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 YearsBaseline to 2 YearsThe primary analysis included all randomized eyes and followed the intent-to-treat principle.Letter scoreMEDIAN
PRIMARYDistribution of Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Yearsbaseline to 2 yearsThe primary analysis included all randomized eyes and followed the intent-to-treat principlePercentage of EyesNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 YearsBaseline to 2 yearsOnly subjects with available OCTs at baseline and 2 years are included in the OCT analysis.MicronsMEAN
SECONDARYMedian Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 YearsBaseline to 2 YearsOnly subjects with an available OCT's at baseline and 2 years are included in the OCT analysis.MicronsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Central Subfield Thickening Decreased by >=50% Baseline to 2 YearsBaseline to 2 YearsOnly subjects with available OCTs at baseline and 2 years are included in the OCT analysis.Percentage of EyesNUMBER
SECONDARYCentral Subfield Thickness < 250 Microns at 2 Years2 YearsOnly subjects with available OCTs at baseline and 2 years are included in the OCT analysis.Percentage of EyesNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 YearsBaseline to 3 yearThe study discontinued early. Only subjects with 3 years data are included in 3 year analysis.Letter ScoreMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 YearsBaseline to 3 yearThe study discontinued early. Only subjects with 3 years data are included in 3 year analysis.Letter ScoreMEDIAN

Results by group81

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years.Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation1Standard Deviation 17Letter score
Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years.1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone-2Standard Deviation 18Letter score
Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years.4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone-3Standard Deviation 22Letter score
Central Subfield Thickness at 2 YearsFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation243Inter-Quartile Range 148Microns
Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone305Inter-Quartile Range 167Microns
Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone279Inter-Quartile Range 160Microns
Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 YearsFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation4Inter-Quartile Range -6 to 11Letter score
Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone1Inter-Quartile Range -11 to 9Letter score
Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone2Inter-Quartile Range -11 to 11Letter score
Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 YearsFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation>= 15 letter improvement18Percentage of Eyes

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
2 YearsSTARTEDFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation330
2 YearsSTARTED1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone256
2 YearsSTARTED4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone254
2 YearsCOMPLETEDFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation272
2 YearsCOMPLETED1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone220
2 YearsCOMPLETED4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone205
2 YearsNOT COMPLETEDFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation58
2 YearsNOT COMPLETED1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone36
2 YearsNOT COMPLETED4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone49
3 YearsSTARTEDFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation143

Adverse events567

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnterior Chamber CellEye disordersFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation1330
otherAnterior Chamber CellEye disorders1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone14256
otherAnterior Chamber CellEye disorders4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone9254
otherCataractEye disordersFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation38330
otherCataractEye disorders1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone29256
otherCataractEye disorders4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone57254
otherCataract CorticalEye disordersFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation19330
otherCataract CorticalEye disorders1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone22256
otherCataract CorticalEye disorders4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone32254
otherCataract NuclearEye disordersFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation13330

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation
Total, all-cause mortality1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone
Total, all-cause mortality4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone
Total, other adverse eventsFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation69330
Total, other adverse events1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone98256
Total, other adverse events4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone163254
Total, serious adverse eventsFocal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation135330
Total, serious adverse events1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone69256
Total, serious adverse events4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone54254

Papers8

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
17765429RESULTPubMed
18662829RESULTPubMed
18698292RESULTPubMed
19273785RESULTPubMed
20008708RESULTPubMed
20122739RESULTPubMed
21571677DERIVEDPubMed
33206392DERIVEDPubMed

Grants3

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
U10EY014231DIABETIC RETINOPATHY CLINICAL RESEARCH NETWORK COORDINATING CENTERGLASSMAN, ADAM RJAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC.NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE2002 to 2018NIH RePORTER
U10EY018817Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Operations CenterBRESSLER, NEIL MICHAELJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYNATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE2009 to 2013NIH RePORTER
U10EY014229Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research NetworkDANIS, RONALDUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISONNATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE2002 to 2008NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00367133

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00367133/results?page=2