Trial ยท NCT00367133
Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT00367133, Phase 3, Completed, Jaeb Center for Health Research; results first posted 2010-07-09
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema. Trials, record NCT00367133. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00367133
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema
- NCT number
- NCT00367133
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 840 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Jaeb Center for Health Research
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- Interventions
- Standard of Care Group, 1mg triamcinolone acetonide, 4mg triamcinolone acetonide
- First posted
- 2006-08-22
- Last updated
- 2016-08-26
- Results first posted
- 2010-07-09
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes14
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years. | Baseline to 2 Years | Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0. |
| Primary | Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years | Baseline to 2 Years | Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. |
| Primary | Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years | baseline to 2 years | Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. |
| Secondary | Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years | 2 Years | Median central subfield thickness at two-years. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. |
| Secondary | Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years | Baseline to 2 years | Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes and improvement. |
| Secondary | Median Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years | Baseline to 2 Years | Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement. |
| Secondary | Overall Central Subfield Thickening Decreased by >=50% Baseline to 2 Years | Baseline to 2 Years | Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. |
| Secondary | Central Subfield Thickness < 250 Microns at 2 Years | 2 Years | Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. |
| Secondary | Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years | Baseline to 3 year | Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. |
| Secondary | Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years | Baseline to 3 year | Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best Value on the scale=97, Worst Value=0 |
1 to 10 of 14Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 14 registered outcomesOutcomes15
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years. | Baseline to 2 Years | The primary analysis included all randomized eyes and followed the intent-to-treat principle. | Letter score | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years | 2 Years | Only subjects with an available Optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and 2 years are included in the OCT analysis. | Microns | MEDIAN |
| PRIMARY | Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years | Baseline to 2 Years | The primary analysis included all randomized eyes and followed the intent-to-treat principle. | Letter score | MEDIAN |
| PRIMARY | Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years | baseline to 2 years | The primary analysis included all randomized eyes and followed the intent-to-treat principle | Percentage of Eyes | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years | Baseline to 2 years | Only subjects with available OCTs at baseline and 2 years are included in the OCT analysis. | Microns | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Median Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years | Baseline to 2 Years | Only subjects with an available OCT's at baseline and 2 years are included in the OCT analysis. | Microns | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | Overall Central Subfield Thickening Decreased by >=50% Baseline to 2 Years | Baseline to 2 Years | Only subjects with available OCTs at baseline and 2 years are included in the OCT analysis. | Percentage of Eyes | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Central Subfield Thickness < 250 Microns at 2 Years | 2 Years | Only subjects with available OCTs at baseline and 2 years are included in the OCT analysis. | Percentage of Eyes | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years | Baseline to 3 year | The study discontinued early. Only subjects with 3 years data are included in 3 year analysis. | Letter Score | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years | Baseline to 3 year | The study discontinued early. Only subjects with 3 years data are included in 3 year analysis. | Letter Score | MEDIAN |
1 to 10 of 15Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 15 outcomesResults by group81
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years. | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 1 | Standard Deviation 17 | Letter score | |
| Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years. | 1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | -2 | Standard Deviation 18 | Letter score | |
| Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years. | 4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | -3 | Standard Deviation 22 | Letter score | |
| Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 243 | Inter-Quartile Range 148 | Microns | |
| Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years | 1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 305 | Inter-Quartile Range 167 | Microns | |
| Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years | 4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 279 | Inter-Quartile Range 160 | Microns | |
| Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 4 | Inter-Quartile Range -6 to 11 | Letter score | |
| Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years | 1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 1 | Inter-Quartile Range -11 to 9 | Letter score | |
| Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years | 4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 2 | Inter-Quartile Range -11 to 11 | Letter score | |
| Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | >= 15 letter improvement | 18 | Percentage of Eyes |
1 to 10 of 81Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 81 results by groupParticipant flow18
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Years | STARTED | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 330 | |
| 2 Years | STARTED | 1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 256 | |
| 2 Years | STARTED | 4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 254 | |
| 2 Years | COMPLETED | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 272 | |
| 2 Years | COMPLETED | 1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 220 | |
| 2 Years | COMPLETED | 4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 205 | |
| 2 Years | NOT COMPLETED | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 58 | |
| 2 Years | NOT COMPLETED | 1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 36 | |
| 2 Years | NOT COMPLETED | 4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 49 | |
| 3 Years | STARTED | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 143 |
1 to 10 of 18Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 18 participant flowAdverse events567
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Anterior Chamber Cell | Eye disorders | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 1 | 330 | |
| other | Anterior Chamber Cell | Eye disorders | 1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 14 | 256 | |
| other | Anterior Chamber Cell | Eye disorders | 4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 9 | 254 | |
| other | Cataract | Eye disorders | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 38 | 330 | |
| other | Cataract | Eye disorders | 1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 29 | 256 | |
| other | Cataract | Eye disorders | 4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 57 | 254 | |
| other | Cataract Cortical | Eye disorders | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 19 | 330 | |
| other | Cataract Cortical | Eye disorders | 1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 22 | 256 | |
| other | Cataract Cortical | Eye disorders | 4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 32 | 254 | |
| other | Cataract Nuclear | Eye disorders | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 13 | 330 |
1 to 10 of 567Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 567 adverse eventsAdverse event totals9
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | 1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | 4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | ||
| Total, other adverse events | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 69 | 330 |
| Total, other adverse events | 1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 98 | 256 |
| Total, other adverse events | 4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 163 | 254 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 135 | 330 |
| Total, serious adverse events | 1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 69 | 256 |
| Total, serious adverse events | 4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 54 | 254 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers8
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants3
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
| Project | Title | Principal investigators | Organization | Funder | Fiscal years | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U10EY014231 | DIABETIC RETINOPATHY CLINICAL RESEARCH NETWORK COORDINATING CENTER | GLASSMAN, ADAM R | JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. | NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE | 2002 to 2018 | NIH RePORTER |
| U10EY018817 | Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Operations Center | BRESSLER, NEIL MICHAEL | JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE | 2009 to 2013 | NIH RePORTER |
| U10EY014229 | Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network | DANIS, RONALD | UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON | NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE | 2002 to 2008 | NIH RePORTER |
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00367133
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00367133/results?page=2