ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00377637

A Study of Mycophenolate Mofetil (CellCept) in Management of Patients With Lupus Nephritis.

NCT00377637, Phase 3, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2011-12-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Mycophenolate Mofetil (CellCept) in Management of Patients With Lupus Nephritis. Trials, record NCT00377637. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00377637

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Mycophenolate Mofetil (CellCept) in Management of Patients With Lupus Nephritis.
NCT number
NCT00377637
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
370 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Lupus Nephritis
Interventions
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), Cyclophosphamide, Azathioprine, Placebo to Azathioprine, Placebo to Mycophenolate mofetil, Corticosteroid
First posted
2006-09-18
Last updated
2011-12-06
Results first posted
2011-12-06
Limitations and caveats
For many of the Maintenance Phase Outcomes, the total number of events precluded a meaningful time to event statistical analysis, therefore, only events numbers are reported.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryInduction Phase: Number of Patients Showing Treatment Response24 weeks
Treatment response was adjudicated by a blinded clinical endpoints committee (CEC) and defined as: a) Decrease in proteinuria, defined as a decrease in the urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCr) to \<3 in subjects with baseline proteinuria ≥3 UPCr or a decrease in the UPCr by ≥50% in subjects with proteinuria \<3 UPCr at Baseline, and b) Stabilization of serum creatinine or improvement. UPCr were derived from the 24 hour urine collection. Patients who did not show a treatment response at Week 24 or who withdrew earlier than Week 24 were considered non-responders.
PrimaryMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalFrom the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36
Treatment Failure was adjudicated by a clinical endpoints committee and was defined as the time to the earliest occurrence of any one of the following: death, end stage renal disease, sustained doubling of serum creatinine, renal flare, or a requirement for rescue therapy for exacerbation or deterioration of Lupus nephritis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were estimated from the observed time to treatment failure for each patient. The data presented are the percentage of participants who were treatment-failure free at each time interval as estimated by Kaplan-Meier.
SecondaryInduction Phase: Number of Participants Achieving Complete Remission24 weeks
Number of participants achieving complete remission as defined by return to normal serum creatinine, proteinuria ≤500 mg/24 hours and an inactive urinary sediment (absence of red blood cells, white blood cells or cellular or granular casts) after 24 weeks.
SecondaryInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum CreatinineBaseline, Week 24
SecondaryInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 24-hour Urine ProteinBaseline, Week 2424-hour urine protein was measured at Baseline and Week 24.
SecondaryInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum AlbuminBaseline, Week 24
SecondaryInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreBaseline, 24 weeks
BILAG indices provide a scoring system for the assessment of lupus disease activity in terms of the need for steroid treatment in 8 organs/systems. Eighty-six items were scored resulting in a classification of A (severe activity), B (moderate activity), C (mild activity), D (no current activity) and E (no activity ever observed) for each organ system. The BILAG individual system summaries were calculated by a program supplied by ADS-Limathon (Sheffield, UK). The score at baseline was compared to the score at the 24 week endpoint for each treatment group, reported here for the renal system.
SecondaryInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresBaseline and 24 weeks
The SF-36 is a 36 item quality of life questionnaire. The short-form version has eleven questions that permit the participant to rate how they feel that particular day. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores and two component scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 score with the higher scores indicating better quality of life.
SecondaryMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of DeathsFrom the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36
Treatment Failure was adjudicated by a clinical endpoints committee (CEC) and was defined as the time to the earliest occurrence of any one of the following: death, end stage renal disease, sustained doubling of serum creatinine, renal flare, or a requirement for rescue therapy for exacerbation or deterioration of Lupus nephritis (LN).
SecondaryMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD)From the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36
Time to treatment failure, adjudicated by the Clinical Endpoints Committee (CEC), was defined as any 1 the following: death, ESRD, sustained doubling of serum creatinine, renal flare (proteinuric or nephritic), or requirement for rescue therapy to treat deterioration or exacerbation of Lupus nephritis. ESRD is defined as progression to chronic hemodialysis or renal transplant.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYInduction Phase: Number of Patients Showing Treatment Response24 weeksAnalysis population was intent to treat which comprised all subjects who were randomized into the study and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYMaintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalFrom the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36Intent to treat analysis population which consisted of all subjects who were randomized to the maintenance phase of the study and had at least 1 maintenance efficacy assessment.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYInduction Phase: Number of Participants Achieving Complete Remission24 weeksAnalysis population was intent to treat.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum CreatinineBaseline, Week 24Analysis population was intent to treat. The analysis included only those patients for whom data was available at both time points, as indicated by n.µmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 24-hour Urine ProteinBaseline, Week 24Analysis population was intent to treat. The analysis included only those patients for whom data was available at both time points, as indicated by n.mg/dayMEAN
SECONDARYInduction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum AlbuminBaseline, Week 24Analysis population was intent to treat. The analysis included only those patients for whom data was available at both time points, as indicated by n.g/LMEAN
SECONDARYInduction Phase: Change in Renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) ScoreBaseline, 24 weeksAnalysis population was intent to treat. The endpoint was defined using the last observation carried forward approach. If no post-Baseline value was available, endpoint was considered missing.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYInduction Phase: Change From Baseline in Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Domain and Component ScoresBaseline and 24 weeksThis analysis population is intention to treat. The analysis included only those patients for whom data was available at both time points, as indicated by n.Scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of DeathsFrom the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36Maintenance Phase intent to treat population.DeathsNUMBER
SECONDARYMaintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD)From the start of the Maintenance Phase to Month 36
Maintenance Phase intent to treat population. The analysis includes all event data, regardless of whether or not the event was the earliest Clinical Endpoints Committee-adjudicated reason for treatment failure.
participantsNUMBER

Results by group158

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Induction Phase: Number of Patients Showing Treatment ResponseIntravenous CyclophosphamideResponder98participants
Induction Phase: Number of Patients Showing Treatment ResponseMycophenolate MofetilResponder104participants
Induction Phase: Number of Patients Showing Treatment ResponseIntravenous CyclophosphamideNon-responder87participants
Induction Phase: Number of Patients Showing Treatment ResponseMycophenolate MofetilNon-responder81participants
Maintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMycophenolate MofetilStart of Maintenance Phase to Month 398.2Percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalAzathioprineStart of Maintenance Phase to Month 397.2Percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMycophenolate MofetilMonth 3 to Month 693.7Percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalAzathioprineMonth 3 to Month 689.3Percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalMycophenolate MofetilMonth 6 to Month 989.9Percentage of participants
Maintenance Phase: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Percentage of Participants Treatment Failure Free, by Time IntervalAzathioprineMonth 6 to Month 986.2Percentage of participants

Participant flow28

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Induction PhaseSTARTEDInduction Phase: Cyclophosphamide185
Induction PhaseSTARTEDInduction Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil185
Induction PhaseSTARTEDMaintenance Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil0
Induction PhaseSTARTEDMaintenance Phase: Azathioprine0
Induction PhaseSafety PopulationInduction Phase: Cyclophosphamide180
Induction PhaseSafety PopulationInduction Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil184
Induction PhaseSafety PopulationMaintenance Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil0
Induction PhaseSafety PopulationMaintenance Phase: Azathioprine0
Induction PhaseCOMPLETEDInduction Phase: Cyclophosphamide156
Induction PhaseCOMPLETEDInduction Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil150

Adverse events852

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsInduction Phase: Cyclophosphamide29180
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsInduction Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil25184
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsMaintenance Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil15115
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsMaintenance Phase: Azathioprine13111
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsInduction Phase: Cyclophosphamide28180
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsInduction Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil17184
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsMaintenance Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil41115
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsMaintenance Phase: Azathioprine36111
otherHerpes zosterInfections and infestationsInduction Phase: Cyclophosphamide6180
otherHerpes zosterInfections and infestationsInduction Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil14184

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityInduction Phase: Cyclophosphamide
Total, all-cause mortalityInduction Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil
Total, all-cause mortalityMaintenance Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil
Total, all-cause mortalityMaintenance Phase: Azathioprine
Total, other adverse eventsInduction Phase: Cyclophosphamide171180
Total, other adverse eventsInduction Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil177184
Total, other adverse eventsMaintenance Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil113115
Total, other adverse eventsMaintenance Phase: Azathioprine108111
Total, serious adverse eventsInduction Phase: Cyclophosphamide41180
Total, serious adverse eventsInduction Phase: Mycophenolate Mofetil51184

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
19933596DERIVEDPubMed
20039429DERIVEDPubMed
21080348DERIVEDPubMed
22087680DERIVEDPubMed
22922564DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) vs Azathioprine (AZA): Maintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD)Trial comparisons
Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Azathioprine: Maintenance Phase: Participants With Major Extra-renal FlareTrial comparisons
Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Azathioprine: Maintenance Phase: Events Contributing to the Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With Sustained Doubling of Serum CreatinineTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00377637

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00377637/results?page=2