ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00379899

ADVANCE: Study to Evaluate Cinacalcet Plus Low Dose Vitamin D on Vascular Calcification in Subjects With Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Hemodialysis

NCT00379899, Phase 4, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2010-10-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. ADVANCE: Study to Evaluate Cinacalcet Plus Low Dose Vitamin D on Vascular Calcification in Subjects With Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Hemodialysis. Trials, record NCT00379899. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00379899

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
ADVANCE: Study to Evaluate Cinacalcet Plus Low Dose Vitamin D on Vascular Calcification in Subjects With Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Hemodialysis
NCT number
NCT00379899
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
360 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Chronic Kidney Disease, End Stage Renal Disease, Coronary Artery Calcification, Vascular Calcification, Calcification, Cardiovascular Disease, Chronic Renal Failure, Hyperparathyroidism, Kidney Disease, Nephrology, Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
Interventions
cinacalcet
First posted
2006-09-25
Last updated
2014-07-23
Results first posted
2010-10-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in CAC ScoreBaseline and Week 52Percent Change from baseline to week 52 in coronary artery calcification (CAC) score. CAC score ranges from 0 to 7500, with 0 representing no calcification.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving > 15% Progression of CAC.52 weeksNumber of participants achieving \>15% progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC) at week 52
SecondaryAbsolute Change in PTHBaseline and Week 52Absolute change from baseline in intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in AC ScoreBaseline and Week 52Change from baseline in aortic calcification (AC) score at week 52. AC score ranges from 0 to \>75,000, with 0 representing no calcification.
SecondaryChange From Baseline of the Progression of AVC.Baseline and Week 52Change from baseline in the aortic valve calcification (AVC) score. AVC score ranges from 0 to \>10,000, with 0 representing no calcification.
SecondaryPercent Change in PTHBaseline and Week 52Percent change from baseline in intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH)
SecondaryAbsolute Change in CalciumBaseline and Weeks 44 through 52Absolute change from baseline in serum calcium to weeks 44 through 52
SecondaryPercent Change in CalciumBaseline and Weeks 44 through 52Percent change from baseline in corrected serum calcium to weeks 44 through 52
SecondaryAbsolute Change in PhosphorusBaseline and Weeks 44 through 52Absolute change from baseline in serum phosphorus to weeks 44 through 52
SecondaryPercent Change in PhosphorusBaseline and Weeks 44 through 52Percent change from baseline in serum phosphorus to weeks 44 through 52

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change From Baseline in CAC ScoreBaseline and Week 52Efficacy Evaluable Analysis Set, composed of all randomized participants with a baseline and a week 52 coronary artery calcification scoreUnits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Achieving > 15% Progression of CAC.52 weeksEfficacy Evaluable Analysis Set, composed of all randomized participants with a baseline and a week 52 coronary artery calcification scoreParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in PTHBaseline and Week 52Efficacy Evaluable Analysis Set, composed of all randomized participants with a baseline and a week 52 coronary artery calcification scorepg/mLMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in AC ScoreBaseline and Week 52Efficacy Evaluable Analysis Set, composed of all randomized participants with a baseline and a week 52 coronary artery calcification scoreUnits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline of the Progression of AVC.Baseline and Week 52Efficacy Evaluable Analysis Set, composed of all randomized participants with a baseline and a week 52 coronary artery calcification scoreUnits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in PTHBaseline and Week 52Efficacy Evaluable Analysis Set, composed of all randomized participants with a baseline and a week 52 coronary artery calcification scorePercentageMEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in CalciumBaseline and Weeks 44 through 52Efficacy Evaluable Analysis Set, composed of all randomized participants with a baseline and a week 52 coronary artery calcification scoremg/dLMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in CalciumBaseline and Weeks 44 through 52Efficacy Evaluable Analysis Set, composed of all randomized participants with a baseline and a week 52 coronary artery calcification scorePercentageMEAN
SECONDARYAbsolute Change in PhosphorusBaseline and Weeks 44 through 52Efficacy Evaluable Analysis Set, composed of all randomized participants with a baseline and a week 52 coronary artery calcification scoremg/dLMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in PhosphorusBaseline and Weeks 44 through 52Efficacy Evaluable Analysis Set, composed of all randomized participants with a baseline and a week 52 coronary artery calcification scorePercentageMEAN

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change From Baseline in CAC ScoreCinacalcet43.74Standard Error 7.40Units on a scale
Percent Change From Baseline in CAC ScoreControl57.39Standard Error 7.77Units on a scale
Number of Participants Achieving > 15% Progression of CAC.Cinacalcet63Participants
Number of Participants Achieving > 15% Progression of CAC.Control77Participants
Absolute Change in PTHCinacalcet-132.86Standard Error 29.46pg/mL
Absolute Change in PTHControl-71.55Standard Error 30.83pg/mL
Change From Baseline in AC ScoreCinacalcet935.92Standard Error 233.81Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in AC ScoreControl1677.28Standard Error 385.39Units on a scale
Change From Baseline of the Progression of AVC.Cinacalcet24.29Standard Error 24.19Units on a scale
Change From Baseline of the Progression of AVC.Control55.96Standard Error 18.34Units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCinacalcet180
Overall StudySTARTEDControl180
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCinacalcet140
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDControl140
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCinacalcet40
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDControl40

Adverse events532

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCinacalcet6180
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersControl Group13180
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersCinacalcet6180
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersControl Group11180
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCinacalcet29180
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersControl Group22180
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersCinacalcet29180
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersControl Group14180
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersCinacalcet23180
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersControl Group22180

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCinacalcet
Total, all-cause mortalityControl Group
Total, other adverse eventsCinacalcet95180
Total, other adverse eventsControl Group93180
Total, serious adverse eventsCinacalcet88180
Total, serious adverse eventsControl Group82180

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
20110249BACKGROUNDPubMed
21148030BACKGROUNDPubMed
22313328BACKGROUNDPubMed
23028103BACKGROUNDPubMed
24151766BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Cinacalcet vs Control: Number of Participants Achieving > 15% Progression of CAC.Trial comparisons
Cinacalcet vs Control Group: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00379899

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00379899/results?page=2