ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00391079

Sativex Versus Placebo When Added to Existing Treatment for Central Neuropathic Pain in MS

NCT00391079, Phase 3, Completed, GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd; results first posted 2012-07-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Sativex Versus Placebo When Added to Existing Treatment for Central Neuropathic Pain in MS. Trials, record NCT00391079. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00391079

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Sativex Versus Placebo When Added to Existing Treatment for Central Neuropathic Pain in MS
NCT number
NCT00391079
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
339 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Conditions
Multiple Sclerosis
Interventions
Sativex, Placebo
First posted
2006-10-23
Last updated
2013-06-24
Results first posted
2012-07-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Mean Pain Due to MS NRS Score14 weeks: Baseline - End of Treatment (last 7 days of treatment)
The pain NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain due to multiple sclerosis. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline.
PrimaryNumber of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score From Baseline14 weeks: Baseline - end of treatment (last 7 days)
A positive 30% pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 30% in the mean NRS pain score from baseline to week 14 (last 7 days). The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain due to multiple sclerosis. The pain NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening.
SecondaryChange in Pain From Baseline to End of the Treatment Using the NPS (Neuropathic Pain Scale)14 weeks: Baseline - End of treatment (Week 14)The NPS score is 0-100 sum of 10 individual pain scores (0-10 NRS, 0= no pain to 10 = most pain imaginable). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in pain.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Break-through Analgesia Usage14 weeks: baseline - end of treatment (last 7 days)
Use of break through medication was recorded daily during the 14 weeks of the study as the number of paracetamol tablets taken. The change in mean daily quantities of tablets used was calculated from baseline to the last seven days of treatment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Short Form14 weeks: Baseline to end of treatment (last 7 days of treatment)
The BPI-SF is a 14-item questionnaire that asks patients to rate pain over the prior week and the degree to which it interferes with activities on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Severity is measured as worst pain, least pain, average pain, and pain right now. The severity composite score was calculated as the arithmetic mean of the four severity items(range 0-10). The minimum value is zero and maximum is 10. A higher score represents a poor outcome.
SecondaryChange in Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)Week 14
A 7-point Likert-type scale was used, with the question: 'Please assess the status of your pain due to multiple sclerosis since entry into the study using the scale below' with the markers "very much improved, much improved, slightly improved, no change, slightly worse, much worse or very much worse". At baseline subjects wrote a brief description of their pain caused by multiple sclerosis which was used at Week 14 to aid their memory regarding their symptoms at study start. For each of above markers the number of participants were reported.
SecondaryChange in Sleep Disruption NRS14 weeks; Baseline to end of treatment (last 7 days)
The sleep disruption NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate how your pain disrupted your sleep last night?" where 0 = did not disrupt sleep and 10 = completely disrupted (unable to sleep at all). A negative value indicates an improvement in sleep disruption score from baseline.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Mean Pain Due to MS NRS Score14 weeks: Baseline - End of Treatment (last 7 days of treatment)Change in mean daily NRS scoreunits on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYNumber of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score From Baseline14 weeks: Baseline - end of treatment (last 7 days)participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Pain From Baseline to End of the Treatment Using the NPS (Neuropathic Pain Scale)14 weeks: Baseline - End of treatment (Week 14)Points on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in Break-through Analgesia Usage14 weeks: baseline - end of treatment (last 7 days)tabletsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Short Form14 weeks: Baseline to end of treatment (last 7 days of treatment)All subjects who completed the BPI-short form were included in the analysis. Four subjects from the sativex group and three subjects from the placebo group did not complete the form.Points on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC)Week 14All subjects who completed the question were included in the analysis. Two subjects from the Sativex group and six subjects from the placebo group did not complete the question.percentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Sleep Disruption NRS14 weeks; Baseline to end of treatment (last 7 days)points on a scaleMEAN

Results by group26

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Mean Pain Due to MS NRS ScoreSativex-2.02Standard Deviation 2.15units on a scale
Change in Mean Pain Due to MS NRS ScorePlacebo-1.89Standard Deviation 2.33units on a scale
Number of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score From BaselineSativex84participants
Number of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score From BaselinePlacebo77participants
Change in Pain From Baseline to End of the Treatment Using the NPS (Neuropathic Pain Scale)Sativex-14.24Standard Deviation 18.17Points on a scale
Change in Pain From Baseline to End of the Treatment Using the NPS (Neuropathic Pain Scale)Placebo-11.44Standard Deviation 17.86Points on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Break-through Analgesia UsageSativex-1.16Standard Deviation 1.61tablets
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Break-through Analgesia UsagePlacebo-1.02Standard Deviation 2.07tablets
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Short FormSativex-1.5Standard Deviation 2.04Points on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) Short FormPlacebo-1.4Standard Deviation 2.09Points on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSativex167
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo172
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSativex141
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo156
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSativex26
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo16

Adverse events48

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersSativex15167
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo6172
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersSativex13167
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo7172
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersSativex12167
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo10172
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersSativex7167
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo5172
otherVomittingGastrointestinal disordersSativex5167
otherVomittingGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo5172

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySativex
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsSativex99167
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo65172
Total, serious adverse eventsSativex3167
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo2172

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
23180178RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Sativex vs Placebo: Number of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score From BaselineTrial comparisons
Sativex vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00391079

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00391079/results?page=2