ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00402727

Comparison of Sequential IV/PO Moxifloxacin With IV Piperacillin/Tazobactam Followed by PO Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid in Patients With a Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infection

NCT00402727, Phase 3, Completed, Bayer; results first posted 2010-01-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparison of Sequential IV/PO Moxifloxacin With IV Piperacillin/Tazobactam Followed by PO Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid in Patients With a Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infection. Trials, record NCT00402727. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00402727

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparison of Sequential IV/PO Moxifloxacin With IV Piperacillin/Tazobactam Followed by PO Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid in Patients With a Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infection
NCT number
NCT00402727
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
813 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Bayer
Conditions
Abscess, Wound Infection, Diabetic Foot, Ulcer
Interventions
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039), Piperacillin/Tazobactam & Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid
First posted
2006-11-22
Last updated
2014-11-07
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2006-001599-18
Results first posted
2010-01-11
Limitations and caveats
Ten patients (six from the moxifloxacin group and 4 from the comparator group) did not receive study medication. They were excluded from the safety analyses. No adverse events were reported in these patients.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Cured Participants as Determined by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Test of Cure Visit in the Per Protocol (PP) Population14 - 28 days after last dose of study medication
Clinical response was evaluated by the DRC and graded as "cure", "failure" or "indeterminate" at the TOC visit. Members of the DRC were provided with subject data from the study database that included clinical signs and symptoms at each visit, concomitant medication, microbiology results, laboratory tests and interpretation of photographs.
SecondaryPercentage of Cured Participants as Determined by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Test of Cure Visit in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population14 - 28 days after last dose of study medication
Clinical response was evaluated by the DRC and graded as "cure", "failure" or "indeterminate" at the TOC visit. Members of the DRC were provided with subject data from the study database that included clinical signs and symptoms at each visit, concomitant medication, microbiology results, laboratory tests and interpretation of photographs.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Assessed as Improvements by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at the During Treatment Day 3-5 in the Per Protocol (PP) Population3 - 5 days after start of treatment
Clinical response was evaluated by the investigator and graded as "improvement in signs and symptoms," or "failure to respond," or "indeterminate" at Day 3 to 5 after treatment start based on subject data for clinical signs and symptoms at each visit, concomitant medication, microbiology results, laboratory tests and interpretation of photographs.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Assessed as Improvements by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at the During Treatment Day 3-5 in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population3 - 5 days after start of treatment
Clinical response was evaluated by the investigator and graded as "improvement in signs and symptoms," or "failure to respond," or "indeterminate" at Day 3 to 5 after treatment start based on subject data for clinical signs and symptoms at each visit, concomitant medication, microbiology results, laboratory tests and interpretation of photographs
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Assessed as Resolution by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at End of Therapy in the Per Protocol (PP) Populationafter 7 - 21 days of treatment
Clinical response was evaluated by the investigator and graded as "resolution," or "failure to respond," or "indeterminate" at the end of therapy based on subject data for clinical signs and symptoms at each visit, concomitant medication, microbiology results, laboratory tests and interpretation of photographs.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Assessed as Resolution by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at End of Therapy in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Populationafter 7 - 21 days of treatment
Clinical response was evaluated by the investigator and graded as "resolution", or "failure to respond," or "indeterminate" at the end of therapy based on subject data for clinical signs and symptoms at each visit, concomitant medication, microbiology results, laboratory tests and interpretation of photographs.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Bacteriological Success (BS) at 3 to 5 Days After Start of Treatment in the ITT Population With Causative Organisms3 - 5 days after start of treatment
Bacteriological success was defined as presumed eradication or eradication without superinfection. Presumed eradication was defined as clinical cure in absence of a culture, eradication as a negative culture, superinfection as appearance of a new organism.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Bacteriological Success (BS) at 3 to 5 Days After Start of Treatment in the Microbiological Valid (MBV) Population3 - 5 days after start of treatment
Bacteriological success was defined as presumed eradication or eradication without superinfection. Presumed eradication was defined as clinical cure in absence of a culture, eradication as a negative culture, superinfection as appearance of a new organism.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Bacteriological Success (BS) After 7 - 21 Days of Treatment in the ITT Population With Causative Organismsafter 7 - 21 days of treatment
Bacteriological success is presumed eradication or eradication without recurrence or superinfection. Presumed eradication was defined as clinical cure in absence of a culture, eradication as a negative culture, recurrence as reappearance of organism present at start of study, superinfection as appearance of a new organism.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Bacteriological Success (BS) After 7 - 21 Days of Treatment in the Microbiological Valid (MBV) Populationafter 7 - 21 days of treatment
Bacteriological success is presumed eradication or eradication without recurrence or superinfection. Presumed eradication was defined as clinical cure in absence of a culture, eradication as a negative culture, recurrence as reappearance of organism present at start of study, superinfection as appearance of a new organism.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Cured Participants as Determined by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Test of Cure Visit in the Per Protocol (PP) Population14 - 28 days after last dose of study medication
The per protocol population was the main analysis set for the assessment of clinical response and was defined as those subject with no major protocol deviations that would have influenced the primary outcome.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Cured Participants as Determined by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Test of Cure Visit in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population14 - 28 days after last dose of study medication
The intent-to-treat population was the analysis set used for the assessment of clinical response and was defined as all randomized subject that received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one observation after intake of study drug.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Assessed as Improvements by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at the During Treatment Day 3-5 in the Per Protocol (PP) Population3 - 5 days after start of treatment
The per protocol population was the main analysis set for the assessment of clinical response and was defined as those subject with no major protocol deviations that would have influenced the primary outcome.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Assessed as Improvements by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at the During Treatment Day 3-5 in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population3 - 5 days after start of treatment
The intent-to-treat population was the analysis set used for the assessment of clinical response and was defined as those subject with no major protocol deviations that would have influenced the secondary outcome.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Assessed as Resolution by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at End of Therapy in the Per Protocol (PP) Populationafter 7 - 21 days of treatment
The per protocol population was the main analysis set for the assessment of clinical response and was defined as those subject with no major protocol deviations that would have influenced the primary outcome.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Assessed as Resolution by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at End of Therapy in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Populationafter 7 - 21 days of treatment
The intent-to-treat population was the analysis set used for the assessment of clinical response and was defined as those subject with no major protocol deviations that would have influenced the secondary outcome.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Bacteriological Success (BS) at 3 to 5 Days After Start of Treatment in the ITT Population With Causative Organisms3 - 5 days after start of treatment
The ITT population with causative organism population included all ITT subjects with least one causative organism that could be cultured from an appropriate specimen within 48 hours prior to or following randomization.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Bacteriological Success (BS) at 3 to 5 Days After Start of Treatment in the Microbiological Valid (MBV) Population3 - 5 days after start of treatment
Microbiologically valid subjects were defined as all valid PP subjects in whom at least one causative organism could be cultured from an appropriate specimen within 48 hours prior to or following randomization and where a bacteriological evaluation at TOC visit was available and different from indeterminate.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Bacteriological Success (BS) After 7 - 21 Days of Treatment in the ITT Population With Causative Organismsafter 7 - 21 days of treatment
The ITT population with causative organism population included all ITT subjects with least one causative organism that could be cultured from an appropriate specimen within 48 hours prior to or following randomization.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Bacteriological Success (BS) After 7 - 21 Days of Treatment in the Microbiological Valid (MBV) Populationafter 7 - 21 days of treatment
Microbiologically valid subjects were defined as all valid PP subjects in whom at least one causative organism could be cultured from an appropriate specimen within 48 hours prior to or following randomization and where a bacteriological evaluation at TOC visit was available and different from indeterminate.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Cured Participants as Determined by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Test of Cure Visit in the Per Protocol (PP) PopulationMoxifloxacin88.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Cured Participants as Determined by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Test of Cure Visit in the Per Protocol (PP) PopulationPIP/TAZ-AMC89.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Cured Participants as Determined by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Test of Cure Visit in the Intent to Treat (ITT) PopulationMoxifloxacin82.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Cured Participants as Determined by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Test of Cure Visit in the Intent to Treat (ITT) PopulationPIP/TAZ-AMC80.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Assessed as Improvements by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at the During Treatment Day 3-5 in the Per Protocol (PP) PopulationMoxifloxacin98.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Assessed as Improvements by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at the During Treatment Day 3-5 in the Per Protocol (PP) PopulationPIP/TAZ-AMC99.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Assessed as Improvements by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at the During Treatment Day 3-5 in the Intent to Treat (ITT) PopulationMoxifloxacin97.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Assessed as Improvements by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at the During Treatment Day 3-5 in the Intent to Treat (ITT) PopulationPIP/TAZ-AMC95.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Assessed as Resolution by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at End of Therapy in the Per Protocol (PP) PopulationMoxifloxacin95.3percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Assessed as Resolution by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at End of Therapy in the Per Protocol (PP) PopulationPIP/TAZ-AMC95.1percentage of participants

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDMoxifloxacin432
Overall StudySTARTEDPIP/TAZ-AMC381
Overall StudyAchieving End Of Treatment (EOT)Moxifloxacin408
Overall StudyAchieving End Of Treatment (EOT)PIP/TAZ-AMC355
Overall StudyAchieving Test Of Cure (TOC)Moxifloxacin390
Overall StudyAchieving Test Of Cure (TOC)PIP/TAZ-AMC347
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMoxifloxacin390
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPIP/TAZ-AMC347
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMoxifloxacin42
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPIP/TAZ-AMC34

Adverse events82

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersMoxifloxacin10426
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPIP/TAZ-AMC8377
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersMoxifloxacin5426
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPIP/TAZ-AMC3377
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersMoxifloxacin7426
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersPIP/TAZ-AMC3377
otherElectrocardiogram QT prolongedInvestigationsMoxifloxacin1426
otherElectrocardiogram QT prolongedInvestigationsPIP/TAZ-AMC5377
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersMoxifloxacin5426
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPIP/TAZ-AMC3377

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMoxifloxacin
Total, all-cause mortalityPIP/TAZ-AMC
Total, other adverse eventsMoxifloxacin35426
Total, other adverse eventsPIP/TAZ-AMC20377
Total, serious adverse eventsMoxifloxacin21426
Total, serious adverse eventsPIP/TAZ-AMC14377

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
21896561RESULTPubMed
23180507RESULTPubMed
31786695DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Moxifloxacin vs PIP/TAZ-AMC: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00402727

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00402727/results?page=2