ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00405067

The Safety & Efficacy of Combination BMS-201038 (AEGR-733) & Ezetimibe vs. Monotherapy in Moderate Hypercholesterolemia

NCT00405067, Phase 2, Completed, Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; results first posted 2014-03-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. The Safety & Efficacy of Combination BMS-201038 (AEGR-733) & Ezetimibe vs. Monotherapy in Moderate Hypercholesterolemia. Trials, record NCT00405067. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00405067

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
The Safety & Efficacy of Combination BMS-201038 (AEGR-733) & Ezetimibe vs. Monotherapy in Moderate Hypercholesterolemia
NCT number
NCT00405067
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
60 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Conditions
Hypercholesterolemia
Interventions
BMS-201038 (AEGR-733), Ezetimibe
First posted
2006-11-29
Last updated
2014-03-04
Results first posted
2014-03-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change in LDL-C at 12 Weeks Therapy Compared to Baseline Between TreatmentsBaseline and 12 weeks of treatment
SecondaryPercent of Change at 12 Weeks Therapy Compared to Baseline Between Treatments for the Following Parameters: Total Cholesterol (TC)Baseline and 12 weeks of treatment
SecondaryPercent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at 12 Weeks as Compared to Baseline.Baseline and 12 weeks of treatment
SecondaryPercent Change in Tryglycerides (TGs) at 12 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeks of treatment
SecondaryPercent Change in HDL-C at 12 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeks of treatment
SecondaryPercent Change in Lipoprotein(a)[Lp(a)]at 12 Weeks as Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeks of treatment
SecondaryPercent Change in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) at 12 Weeks as Compared to Baselinebaseline and 12 weeks of treatment
SecondaryPercent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at 12 Weeks as Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeks of treatment
SecondaryPercent Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at 12 Weeks as Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeks of treatment
SecondaryPercent Change in Body Weight at 12 Weeks as Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeks of treatment

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change in LDL-C at 12 Weeks Therapy Compared to Baseline Between TreatmentsBaseline and 12 weeks of treatmentPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent of Change at 12 Weeks Therapy Compared to Baseline Between Treatments for the Following Parameters: Total Cholesterol (TC)Baseline and 12 weeks of treatmentPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at 12 Weeks as Compared to Baseline.Baseline and 12 weeks of treatmentPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Tryglycerides (TGs) at 12 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeks of treatmentPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in HDL-C at 12 Weeks Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeks of treatmentPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Lipoprotein(a)[Lp(a)]at 12 Weeks as Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeks of treatmentPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo A1) at 12 Weeks as Compared to Baselinebaseline and 12 weeks of treatmentPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at 12 Weeks as Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeks of treatmentPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at 12 Weeks as Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeks of treatmentPercent ChangeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change in Body Weight at 12 Weeks as Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 weeks of treatmentPercent ChangeMEAN

Results by group30

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change in LDL-C at 12 Weeks Therapy Compared to Baseline Between TreatmentsCombination Therapy-46.2Standard Deviation 23.8Percent Change
Percent Change in LDL-C at 12 Weeks Therapy Compared to Baseline Between TreatmentsLomitapide Monotherapy-29.9Standard Deviation 15.3Percent Change
Percent Change in LDL-C at 12 Weeks Therapy Compared to Baseline Between TreatmentsEzetimibe Monotherapy-19.6Standard Deviation 9.9Percent Change
Percent of Change at 12 Weeks Therapy Compared to Baseline Between Treatments for the Following Parameters: Total Cholesterol (TC)Combination Therapy-34.4Standard Deviation 18.8Percent Change
Percent of Change at 12 Weeks Therapy Compared to Baseline Between Treatments for the Following Parameters: Total Cholesterol (TC)Lomitapide Monotherapy-22.8Standard Deviation 12.3Percent Change
Percent of Change at 12 Weeks Therapy Compared to Baseline Between Treatments for the Following Parameters: Total Cholesterol (TC)Ezetimibe Monotherapy-12.0Standard Deviation 8.7Percent Change
Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at 12 Weeks as Compared to Baseline.Combination Therapy-41.3Standard Deviation 22.7Percent Change
Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at 12 Weeks as Compared to Baseline.Lomitapide Monotherapy-26.9Standard Deviation 14.6Percent Change
Percent Change in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at 12 Weeks as Compared to Baseline.Ezetimibe Monotherapy-17.0Standard Deviation 10.5Percent Change
Percent Change in Tryglycerides (TGs) at 12 Weeks Compared to BaselineCombination Therapy-7.0Standard Deviation 36.0Percent Change

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCombination Therapy28
Overall StudySTARTEDLomitapide Monotherapy28
Overall StudySTARTEDEzetimibe Monotherapy29
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCombination Therapy24
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLomitapide Monotherapy19
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEzetimibe Monotherapy24
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCombination Therapy4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLomitapide Monotherapy9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEzetimibe Monotherapy5

Adverse events54

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCombination Therapy9289
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersLomitapide Monotherapy112811
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersEzetimibe Monotherapy2292
otherAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsCombination Therapy5285
otherAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsLomitapide Monotherapy8288
otherAlanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsEzetimibe Monotherapy0290
otherAspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsCombination Therapy3283
otherAspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsLomitapide Monotherapy7287
otherAspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigationsEzetimibe Monotherapy0290
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersCombination Therapy1281

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCombination Therapy
Total, all-cause mortalityLomitapide Monotherapy
Total, all-cause mortalityEzetimibe Monotherapy
Total, other adverse eventsCombination Therapy2428
Total, other adverse eventsLomitapide Monotherapy2428
Total, other adverse eventsEzetimibe Monotherapy1529
Total, serious adverse eventsCombination Therapy028
Total, serious adverse eventsLomitapide Monotherapy128
Total, serious adverse eventsEzetimibe Monotherapy029

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00405067

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00405067/results?page=2