ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00409175

Safety and Efficacy Study of Fx-1006A in Patients With Familial Amyloidosis

NCT00409175, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2012-12-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy Study of Fx-1006A in Patients With Familial Amyloidosis. Trials, record NCT00409175. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00409175

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy Study of Fx-1006A in Patients With Familial Amyloidosis
NCT number
NCT00409175
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
128 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy
Interventions
Fx-1006A, Placebo
First posted
2006-12-08
Last updated
2012-12-17
Results first posted
2012-12-17
Limitations and caveats
Instead of the intended endpoint 'heat pain and cooling threshold', results of 'summated 3 score for small nerve fiber function' were reported.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Measured by Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Month 18Month 18
Response to treatment was indicated by either improvement (decrease from baseline) or stabilization (change from baseline of 0 to less than\[\<\] 2) in NIS-LL score, based on mean of 2 scores in 1 week period. NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation. Each item scored separately for left, right limbs. Components of muscle weakness scored on 0(normal) to 4(paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes, sensation scored 0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Total NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at Month 18Baseline, Month 18
Norfolk QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy; Item 1 to 7: related to symptoms and presence of symptom was assessed as 1 and absence was assessed as 0. Item 8-35: related to activities of daily living and scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0= no problem and 4= severe problem (except item 32, where -2= much better, 0=about the same, 2=much worse). TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -2 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score- Lower Limb (NIS-LL) Score at Month 6, 12 and 18Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left and right limbs. Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) are scored on 0(normal) to 4(paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) were scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Measured by Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Month 6 and 12Month 6, 12
Response to treatment was indicated by either improvement (decrease from baseline) or stabilization (change from baseline of 0 to \<2) in NIS-LL score, based on mean of 2 scores in 1 week period. NIS-LL: assessed muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation. Each item scored separately for left, right limbs. Components of muscle weakness scored on 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis) scale, higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes, sensation scored 0=normal, 1=decreased, or 2=absent. Total NIS-LL score range 0-88, higher score=greater impairment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life - Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at Month 6 and 12Baseline, Month 6, 12
Norfolk QOL-DN: 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy; Item 1 to 7: related to symptoms and presence of symptom was assessed as 1 and absence was assessed as 0. Item 8-35: related to activities of daily living and scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0= no problem and 4= severe problem (except item 32, where -2= much better, 0=about the same, 2=much worse). TQOL= sum of all the items, total possible score range= -2 to 138, where higher score=worse quality of life.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life - Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Domain Scores at Month 6, 12 and 18Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Norfolk QOL-DN:35-item participant-rated questionnaire to assess impact of DN on QOL; Item 1-7:scored as 1=symptom present, 0=symptom absent. Item 8-35: scored on 5-point Likert scale: 0=no problem, 4=severe problem (except item 32: -2=much better, 0=about same, 2=much worse). Norfolk QOL-DN summarized in 5 domains(score range):physical functioning/large fiber neuropathy(-2 to 58), activities of daily living(ADLs) (0 to 20), symptoms(0 to 32), small fiber neuropathy(0 to 16), autonomic neuropathy(0 to 12); higher score=greater impairment, for each. Total score=-2 to138(higher score=worse QOL).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Summated 7 Score for Large Nerve Fiber Function at Month 6, 12 and 18Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Summated 7 score: composite score included five Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS) attributes (peroneal nerve distal motor latency, peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential, peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity, tibial nerve distal motor latency, and sural nerve sensory nerve action potential amplitude) along with Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT) obtained in great toes, and Heart Rate Response to Deep Breathing (HRDB) value. Score was determined through reference to normal values for age, sex and height. Total score range= -26 to 26, where higher score=worse nerve function.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Summated 3 Score for Small Nerve Fiber Function at Month 6, 12 and 18Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
Summated 3 Nerve Tests Small Fiber Normal Deviates Score (NTSFnds) included cooling threshold for the lower limbs, heat pain threshold for the lower limbs and HRDB. Total score range= -11.2 to 11.2, where higher score=worse nerve function.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Month 6, 12 and 18Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared. mBMI was calculated by multiplying BMI by serum albumin levels to compensate for edema formation associated with malnutrition. A progressive decline in mBMI indicated worsening of disease severity.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Stabilized Transthyretin (TTR) TetramerWeek 8, Month 6, 12, 18
TTR tetramer was assessed using a validated immunoturbidimetric assay. The Fraction of Initial (FOI) is the ratio of the measured TTR tetramer concentration after denaturation to the measured TTR tetramer concentration before denaturation. TTR tetramer stabilization is based on the difference between the on-treatment FOI and the baseline FOI expressed as a percentage of the baseline FOI.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Measured by Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Month 18Month 18
ITTset:randomized participants received atleast(\>=)1 dose of study drug, had \>=1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for NIS-LL,Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy(QOL-DN) or discontinued study due to death/liver transplant(LT).Last-observation-carried-forward(LOCF) used;participant who discontinued due to death/LT was set non-responder.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at Month 18Baseline, Month 18
ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for NIS-LL and Norfolk QOL-DN or discontinued study due to death or LT. LOCF method was used.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score- Lower Limb (NIS-LL) Score at Month 6, 12 and 18Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for NIS-LL and Norfolk QOL-DN or discontinued study due to death/LT. 'n' = those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point for each group respectively.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Measured by Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Month 6 and 12Month 6, 12
ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for NIS-LL and Norfolk QOL-DN or discontinued study due to death/LT. LOCF method was used; participant who discontinued due to death/LT was set non-responder.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life - Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at Month 6 and 12Baseline, Month 6, 12
ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for NIS-LL and Norfolk QOL-DN or discontinued study due to death/LT. 'n' = those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time point for each group respectively.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life - Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Domain Scores at Month 6, 12 and 18Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for NIS-LL and Norfolk QOL-DN or discontinued study due to death or LT. 'n' = those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Summated 7 Score for Large Nerve Fiber Function at Month 6, 12 and 18Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for NIS-LL and Norfolk QOL-DN or discontinued study due to death/LT. 'n' = those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Summated 3 Score for Small Nerve Fiber Function at Month 6, 12 and 18Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for NIS-LL and Norfolk QOL-DN or discontinued study due to death/LT. 'n' = those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Modified Body Mass Index (mBMI) at Month 6, 12 and 18Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18
ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment for NIS-LL and Norfolk QOL-DN or discontinued study due to death/LT. 'n' = those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
(kilogram/square meter)*(gram/liter)MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Stabilized Transthyretin (TTR) TetramerWeek 8, Month 6, 12, 18
ITT population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' = those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group96

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Measured by Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Month 18Tafamidis45.395% Confidence Interval 33.1 to 57.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment as Measured by Neuropathy Impairment Score - Lower Limb (NIS-LL) at Month 18Placebo29.595% Confidence Interval 18.1 to 41.0percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at Month 18TafamidisBaseline27.3Standard Deviation 24.2units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at Month 18PlaceboBaseline30.8Standard Deviation 26.7units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at Month 18TafamidisChange at Month 182.4Standard Deviation 14.6units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Norfolk Quality of Life- Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score at Month 18PlaceboChange at Month 186.9Standard Deviation 22.9units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score- Lower Limb (NIS-LL) Score at Month 6, 12 and 18TafamidisBaseline (n=64, 61)8.359Standard Deviation 11.399units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score- Lower Limb (NIS-LL) Score at Month 6, 12 and 18PlaceboBaseline (n=64, 61)11.445Standard Deviation 13.544units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score- Lower Limb (NIS-LL) Score at Month 6, 12 and 18TafamidisChange at Month 6 (n=60, 57)1.260Standard Deviation 3.007units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score- Lower Limb (NIS-LL) Score at Month 6, 12 and 18PlaceboChange at Month 6 (n=60, 57)2.075Standard Deviation 6.407units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTafamidis65
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo63
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTafamidis47
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo44
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTafamidis18
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo19

Adverse events108

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTafamidis065
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo463
otherAtrioventricular block first degreeCardiac disordersTafamidis265
otherAtrioventricular block first degreeCardiac disordersPlacebo663
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersTafamidis365
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo463
otherLacrimation decreasedEye disordersTafamidis665
otherLacrimation decreasedEye disordersPlacebo763
otherPunctate keratitisEye disordersTafamidis565
otherPunctate keratitisEye disordersPlacebo363

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTafamidis
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsTafamidis5765
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo5663
Total, serious adverse eventsTafamidis665
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo563

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
27494299DERIVEDPubMed
28393570DERIVEDPubMed
29115008DERIVEDPubMed
30558645DERIVEDPubMed
31353964DERIVEDPubMed
32107748DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Tafamidis vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00409175

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00409175/results?page=2