ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00413010

Pregabalin in the Treatment of Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD).

NCT00413010, Phase 3, Completed, Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.; results first posted 2009-12-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Pregabalin in the Treatment of Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). Trials, record NCT00413010. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00413010

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Pregabalin in the Treatment of Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD).
NCT number
NCT00413010
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
356 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Conditions
Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Interventions
pregabalin, placebo
First posted
2006-12-19
Last updated
2021-02-10
Results first posted
2009-12-02
Limitations and caveats
Further enrollment in this study was stopped based on the recommendation of an independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC). An interim data analysis did not suggest the potential for robust efficacy. The study was not stopped for any safety findings.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total ScoresBaseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline: average across visit weeks using mixed model. HAM-A=clinician-rated interview measuring presence of anxiety-related symptoms in 14 areas including anxiety, tension, depressed mood, palpitations, breathing difficulties, sleep disturbances, \& restlessness. Total score ranges from 0 to 56; higher score indicates greater anxiety.
SecondaryChange in HAM-A Total Score at Weekly VisitsBaseline, Weeks 1 through Week 8
Change: score at each study week minus score at baseline. HAM-A, a clinician-rated interview, measures presence of anxiety-related symptoms in 14 areas including anxiety, tension, depressed mood, palpitations, breathing difficulties, sleep disturbances, \& restlessness. Total score ranges from 0 to 56; higher score indicates greater anxiety.
SecondaryNumber of Responders Using Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)Weeks 1 through Week 8
Responders = YES if subjects achieved a \>= 50% decrease in HAM-A total score from Baseline to respective study week. HAM-A is a clinician-rated interview measuring the presence of anxiety-related symptoms in 14 areas. Total score ranges from 0 to 56; higher score indicates greater anxiety.
SecondarySubjects in Remission Using Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total ScoreWeek 1 through Week 8
Participant in remission defined as HAM-A total score of \<= 7. HAM-A=clinician-rated interview measuring presence of anxiety-related symptoms in 14 areas including anxiety, tension, depressed mood, palpitations, breathing difficulties, sleep disturbances, \& restlessness. Total score ranges 0 - 56; higher score indicates greater anxiety.
SecondaryTime to Onset of Sustained Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) ImprovementWeek 8
Time to sustained improvement was defined as time to 50% or greater reduction in HAM-A total score from Baseline, which was sustained for the remainder of the study. HAM-A is a clinician-rated interview measuring the presence of anxiety-related symptoms in 14 areas. Total score ranges from 0 to 56; a higher score indicates greater anxiety.
SecondaryNumber of Responders Using Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreWeek 1 through Week 8
Responders = YES using CGI-I if score indicated much improved or very much improved at the last study week. CGI-I is a clinician-rated instrument that measures change in subject's overall status on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
SecondaryClinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) ScoreWeek 8
CGI-S is a clinician-rated instrument measuring the severity of a subject's symptoms on a 7-point categorical scale. Scores range from 1 (not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Higher score indicates that the subject is more ill.
SecondaryChange in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Total ScoreWeeks 1 through Week 8
Change: score at each study week minus score at baseline. HAM-D, clinician-rated interview, measures presence of depressive symptoms in 17 areas (symptoms such as depressed mood, guilty feelings, suicide, sleep disturbances, anxiety levels, \& weight loss). Total score ranges from 0 to 52; higher scores indicate more depression.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total ScoresBaseline, 8 weeks
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who had received at least 1 dose of the double-blind treatment. All efficacy analyses included the ITT subjects who had a Baseline and a post-Baseline assessment of the respective efficacy endpoints.
score on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in HAM-A Total Score at Weekly VisitsBaseline, Weeks 1 through Week 8
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who had received at least 1 dose of the double-blind treatment. All efficacy analyses included the ITT subjects who had a Baseline and a post-Baseline assessment of the respective efficacy endpoints.
score on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Responders Using Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)Weeks 1 through Week 8Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who had received at least 1 dose of the double-blind treatment, and had a baseline and post-baseline efficacy assessment.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSubjects in Remission Using Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total ScoreWeek 1 through Week 8Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who had received at least 1 dose of the double-blind treatment, and had a baseline and post-baseline efficacy assessment.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Onset of Sustained Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) ImprovementWeek 8
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who had received at least 1 dose of the double-blind treatment, and had a baseline and post-baseline efficacy assessment. CI for placebo patients was not estimable.
daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Responders Using Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) ScoreWeek 1 through Week 8Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who had received at least 1 dose of the double-blind treatment, and had a baseline and post-baseline efficacy assessment.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYClinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) ScoreWeek 8Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who had received at least 1 dose of the double-blind treatment, and had a baseline and post-baseline efficacy assessment.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Total ScoreWeeks 1 through Week 8Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who had received at least 1 dose of the double-blind treatment, and had a baseline and post-baseline efficacy assessment.score on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group143

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total ScoresPregabalin-7.6Standard Error 0.35score on scale
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Total ScoresPlacebo-6.4Standard Error 0.36score on scale
Change in HAM-A Total Score at Weekly VisitsPregabalinWeek 1 (n=164;n=169)-4.4Standard Error 0.37score on scale
Change in HAM-A Total Score at Weekly VisitsPlaceboWeek 1 (n=164;n=169)-3.1Standard Error 0.37score on scale
Change in HAM-A Total Score at Weekly VisitsPregabalinWeek 2 (n=166;n=163)-6.3Standard Error 0.43score on scale
Change in HAM-A Total Score at Weekly VisitsPlaceboWeek 2 (n=166;n=163)-5.2Standard Error 0.43score on scale
Change in HAM-A Total Score at Weekly VisitsPregabalinWeek 3 (n=157;n=160)-7.0Standard Error 0.45score on scale
Change in HAM-A Total Score at Weekly VisitsPlaceboWeek 3 (n=157;n=160)-5.5Standard Error 0.45score on scale
Change in HAM-A Total Score at Weekly VisitsPregabalinWeek 4 (n=153;n=150)-8.3Standard Error 0.46score on scale
Change in HAM-A Total Score at Weekly VisitsPlaceboWeek 4 (n=153;n=150)-7.0Standard Error 0.47score on scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPregabalin180
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo176
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPregabalin108
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo113
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPregabalin72
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo63

Adverse events56

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVision blurredEye disordersPregabalin8180
otherVision blurredEye disordersPlacebo2176
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPregabalin5180
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo3176
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPregabalin7180
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo7176
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersPregabalin4180
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo2176
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersPregabalin6180
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo1176

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPregabalin
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsPregabalin81
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo59
Total, serious adverse eventsPregabalin1
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo3

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
22302014DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00413010

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00413010/results?page=2