ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00421707

Randomized Placebo Controlled Efficacy And Safety Study Investigating GW876008 In Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

NCT00421707, Phase 2, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2017-12-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Randomized Placebo Controlled Efficacy And Safety Study Investigating GW876008 In Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Trials, record NCT00421707. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00421707

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Randomized Placebo Controlled Efficacy And Safety Study Investigating GW876008 In Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
NCT number
NCT00421707
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
133 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Interventions
GW876008, Placebo
First posted
2007-01-12
Last updated
2018-01-31
Results first posted
2017-12-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Average Adequate Relief Rate During the Last 4 Weeks of the Treatment Periods (Weeks 3-6. in Period 1, Weeks 12-15 in Period 2).Up to Day 105 (weeks 3-6. in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
For the assessment of average adequate relief rate from IBS symptoms for a participant was planned by collecting the response of a question 'In the past seven days have you had adequate relief of your IBS pain or discomfort? However, in error, the question was not collected in the IVRS system. Therefore, data for this endpoints was not collected during this study.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Changes in Weekly Adequate Relief Rates During the Treatment Periods (Weeks 1-6 in Period 1 and Weeks 9-15 in Period 2).Up to Day 105 (weeks 1-6 in period 1 and weeks 9-15 in period 2).
For the assessment of changes in weekly adequate relief rates during the treatment periods was planned by collecting the response of a question. Overall response was defined as having achieved adequate relief in last 4 weeks. However, in error, the question was not collected in the IVRS system. Therefore, data for this endpoints was not collected during this study.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adequate Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort on All 4 of the Last 4 Weeks of the Treatment Phase Treatment Periods 1 and 2Up to Day 105
For the assessment of average adequate relief rate from IBS symptoms for a participant was planned by collecting the response of a question whether weekly adequate relief from IBS symptoms was achieved?. However, in error, the question was not collected in the IVRS system. Therefore, data for this endpoints was not collected during this study.
PrimaryMean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by RegimenUp to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
The GIS is comprised of ten questions, all rated on a seven point scale ranging from substantially worse (7) to substantially improved (1). GIS assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician on a 7-point scale: 1: very much improved; 2: much improved; 3: minimally improved; 4: no change; 5: minimally worse; 6: much worse; or 7: very much worse for diarrhea, constipation, stool frequency, stool consistency, urgency, bloating, incomplete evacuation, and straining. Values reported are less than the minimum score on scale as the rate is the proportion of the last four weeks that the participant is a responder.
PrimaryRatings on Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBSQoL) ScaleUp to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
The IBSQoL is a self-report quality-of-life measure specific to IBS that can be used to assess the impact of IBS and its treatment. The IBSQoL consists of 30 statements about bowel problems, which formed 9 scales: emotional health, mental health, health belief, sleep, energy, physical functioning, diet, social role, physical role and sexual relation. All 9 scales were rated on a five-point response scale ranging from 1 (always) to 5 (never). Scores for individual items were averaged to obtain a total score for each subscale of IBSQoL. Then transformed to a 0-100 scale for ease of interpretation with higher scores indicating better IBS-specific quality of life. Transformed scale score = (raw score - lowest possible scale score)/ (scale range) X 100. The data presented for individual scale.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Improvements in Pain and DiscomfortUp to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
Number of participants with improvements in pain and discomfort on GIS were presented. GIS assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician on a 7-point scale: 1: very much improved; 2: much improved; 3: minimally improved; 4: no change; 5: minimally worse; 6: much worse; or 7: very much worse on specified time points. Responder = Yes if A responder answered either 'moderately improved' or 'substantially improved'.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pain Severity ScoresBaseline (Day 1) and up to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
Pain severity scores from the 11-point scale and it's corresponding change from Baseline scores was summarized by treatment group for the last 4 weeks (i.e. weeks 3-6 and Weeks 12-15) of treatment period. Scale from 0 to 10, 0 meaning no pain, 10 worst possible pain. Lower values represent a better outcome. Day 1 was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting baseline value from specified time point value. Reported data values are lesser than minimum score on scale as change from Baseline is reported.
SecondaryPercentages of Pain-free DaysUp to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
Abdominal pain free days are those days where the participant reported a score of '0' for abdominal pain at its worst. Abdominal Pain (in the last 24 hours) is based on an 11-point scale where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Improvements in Bowel Function and Changes in Individual Bowel Symptoms/FunctionUp to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
The GIS comprised of ten questions, all rated on a seven point scale ranging from substantially worse (7) to substantially improved (1). GIS assesses the participant's improvement (or worsening) as assessed by the clinician on a 7-point scale: 1: very much improved; 2: much improved; 3: minimally improved; 4: no change; 5: minimally worse; 6: much worse; or 7: very much worse. Number of participants who showed improvement and changes on the scale were presented. Participants were counted as "Yes" if they scored 1-3, and as "No" if they scored 4-7.
SecondaryPlasma Concentrations of GW876008 at Week 3 and 6Week 3 and 6 visits. Pre-dose [after the pre Electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement and just before am dose] and immediately following the 1-3 hour post-dose ECG measurement
For Week 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 visits blood samples were collected at: pre-dose (after the pre ECG measurement and just before am dose) and immediately following the 1-3 hour post-dose ECG measurement and concentration of GW876008 was analyzed. Data for Week 3 and 6 was presented.

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Average Adequate Relief Rate During the Last 4 Weeks of the Treatment Periods (Weeks 3-6. in Period 1, Weeks 12-15 in Period 2).Up to Day 105 (weeks 3-6. in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
Intent to Treat population comprised of all participants who were randomized to treatment, who received at least one dose of double blind medication and for whom at least one valid post baseline efficacy assessment was available.
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Changes in Weekly Adequate Relief Rates During the Treatment Periods (Weeks 1-6 in Period 1 and Weeks 9-15 in Period 2).Up to Day 105 (weeks 1-6 in period 1 and weeks 9-15 in period 2).Intent to Treat population.
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Adequate Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort on All 4 of the Last 4 Weeks of the Treatment Phase Treatment Periods 1 and 2Up to Day 105Intent to Treat population
PRIMARYMean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by RegimenUp to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)Intent to Treat population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.Proportion of participants respondedMEAN
PRIMARYRatings on Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBSQoL) ScaleUp to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)Intent to Treat population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Improvements in Pain and DiscomfortUp to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)Intent to Treat population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Pain Severity ScoresBaseline (Day 1) and up to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)Intent to Treat population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.Score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentages of Pain-free DaysUp to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)
Intent to Treat population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. Washout period was of 3 weeks only. Thus, these categories are not applicable for placebo washout arm.
Percentage of daysMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Improvements in Bowel Function and Changes in Individual Bowel Symptoms/FunctionUp to Day 105 (weeks 3-6 in period 1, weeks 12-15 in period 2)Intent to Treat population.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPlasma Concentrations of GW876008 at Week 3 and 6Week 3 and 6 visits. Pre-dose [after the pre Electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement and just before am dose] and immediately following the 1-3 hour post-dose ECG measurement
Pharmacokinetic concentration population comprised of all participants for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained and analyzed was included. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
ng/mLMEAN

Results by group483

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by RegimenGW876008 125 mgPain and Discomfort0.26Standard Deviation 0.357Proportion of participants responded
Mean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by RegimenPlaceboPain and Discomfort0.22Standard Deviation 0.334Proportion of participants responded
Mean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by RegimenGW876008 125 mgdiarrhea0.30Standard Deviation 0.377Proportion of participants responded
Mean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by RegimenPlacebodiarrhea0.28Standard Deviation 0.383Proportion of participants responded
Mean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by RegimenGW876008 125 mgConstipation0.18Standard Deviation 0.319Proportion of participants responded
Mean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by RegimenPlaceboConstipation0.16Standard Deviation 0.295Proportion of participants responded
Mean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by RegimenGW876008 125 mgStool Frequency0.25Standard Deviation 0.362Proportion of participants responded
Mean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by RegimenPlaceboStool Frequency0.24Standard Deviation 0.349Proportion of participants responded
Mean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by RegimenGW876008 125 mgStool Consistency0.24Standard Deviation 0.370Proportion of participants responded
Mean Global Improvement Scale (GIS) Responder Rate Over the Last Four Weeks by RegimenPlaceboStool Consistency0.21Standard Deviation 0.345Proportion of participants responded

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Period 1: Treatment Period 1STARTEDSequence A/X/B67
Period 1: Treatment Period 1STARTEDSequence B/X/A65
Period 1: Treatment Period 1COMPLETEDSequence A/X/B56
Period 1: Treatment Period 1COMPLETEDSequence B/X/A56
Period 1: Treatment Period 1NOT COMPLETEDSequence A/X/B11
Period 1: Treatment Period 1NOT COMPLETEDSequence B/X/A9
Period 2: WashoutSTARTEDSequence A/X/B56
Period 2: WashoutSTARTEDSequence B/X/A56
Period 2: WashoutCOMPLETEDSequence A/X/B55
Period 2: WashoutCOMPLETEDSequence B/X/A52

Adverse events6

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsGW876008 125 mg9119
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo5120
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo Washout2112
seriousChondrosarcomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)GW876008 125 mg0119
seriousChondrosarcomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Placebo1120
seriousChondrosarcomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Placebo Washout0112

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGW876008 125 mg0119
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0120
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Washout0112
Total, other adverse eventsGW876008 125 mg9119
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo5120
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Washout2112
Total, serious adverse eventsGW876008 125 mg0119
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo1120
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Washout0112

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00421707

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00421707/results?page=2