ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00421928

Tapentadol (CG5503)

NCT00421928, Phase 3, Completed, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.; results first posted 2010-04-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Tapentadol (CG5503). Trials, record NCT00421928. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00421928

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Tapentadol (CG5503)
NCT number
NCT00421928
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,030 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Conditions
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Pain
Interventions
oxycodone, placebo, tapentadol (CG5503)
First posted
2007-01-15
Last updated
2012-04-18
Results first posted
2010-04-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.Baseline and 12 weeks (Primary endpoint is the average pain intensity score during the last week of the maintenance period).
For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Assessing Pain, Disability and Joint Stiffness of the Knee Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12Baseline and 12 week endpointChange from baseline to Week 12 of WOMAC Global Score: WOMAC is measure with a Likert ordinal scale from 0-4 with lower scores indicating lower levels of symptoms or physical disability
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.Baseline and 12 week endpoint
A Sleep Questionniare addressed the following question: "How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night (hours)?" 12 week endpoint-mean changes from baseline at endpoint for sleep latency. Decrease in time(hours) indicates improvement.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12Baseline and 12 week endpointOrdinal measure indicating change from start of treatment (on a scale of 7 = Very much worse to 1 = Very much improved)
SecondaryDistribution of Time to Treatment Discontinuation Due to Lack of EfficacyBaseline to 12 weeksThe median time to treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy from baseline to endpoint
SecondaryChange From Baseline in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index to Week 12Baseline and 12 week endpoint
Change from baseline to end point in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Dimension Questionnaire. A higher score indicates an improvement in health in the Health Status Index. The EQ-5D is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing dead
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Responder Analysis 50% Improvement to Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Defined by the percentage of subjects achieving at least 50% improvement from baseline in the primary endpoint based on the 11-point NRS at week 12. For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.Baseline and 12 weeks (Primary endpoint is the average pain intensity score during the last week of the maintenance period).Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute pain score after discontinuationScores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Assessing Pain, Disability and Joint Stiffness of the Knee Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12Baseline and 12 week endpointIntent To Treat (ITT), observed cases analysis conducted, no imputation performed.Scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.Baseline and 12 week endpointITTHoursMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12Baseline and 12 week endpointITTpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDistribution of Time to Treatment Discontinuation Due to Lack of EfficacyBaseline to 12 weeksITT: The results for median and interquartile ranges were not estimable because insufficient number of subjects discontinued due to lack of efficacy to estimate the values.median timeNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index to Week 12Baseline and 12 week endpointITTscores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Responder Analysis 50% Improvement to Week 12Baseline and Week 12ITT. Subjects who discontinued from the study were considered non-responders.Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.Tapentadol (CG5503)-3.0Standard Deviation 2.39Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.Oxycodone-2.6Standard Deviation 2.38Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.Placebo-2.2Standard Deviation 2.54Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Assessing Pain, Disability and Joint Stiffness of the Knee Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12Tapentadol (CG5503)-1.2Standard Deviation 0.82Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Assessing Pain, Disability and Joint Stiffness of the Knee Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12Oxycodone-1.1Standard Deviation 0.87Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) Assessing Pain, Disability and Joint Stiffness of the Knee Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12Placebo-0.9Standard Deviation 0.84Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.Tapentadol (CG5503)0.2Standard Deviation 2.8Hours
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.Oxycodone0.1Standard Deviation 1.81Hours
Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12.Placebo0.3Standard Deviation 2.72Hours
Percentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12Tapentadol (CG5503)51.1percentage of participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTapentadol (CG5503)344
Overall StudySTARTEDOxycodone342
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo337
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTapentadol (CG5503)181
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOxycodone118
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo203
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTapentadol (CG5503)163
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOxycodone224
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo134

Adverse events99

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTapentadol (CG5503)74344
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersOxycodone125342
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo23337
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersTapentadol (CG5503)65344
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersOxycodone126342
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo22337
otherDry MouthGastrointestinal disordersTapentadol (CG5503)22344
otherDry MouthGastrointestinal disordersOxycodone15342
otherDry MouthGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo8337
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersTapentadol (CG5503)18344

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTapentadol (CG5503)
Total, all-cause mortalityOxycodone
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsTapentadol (CG5503)200344
Total, other adverse eventsOxycodone269342
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo134337
Total, serious adverse eventsTapentadol (CG5503)4344
Total, serious adverse eventsOxycodone10342
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo6337

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
23340531DERIVEDPubMed
23709304DERIVEDPubMed
24353047DERIVEDPubMed
24916058DERIVEDPubMed
24985410DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00421928

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00421928/events?page=2