ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00423735

Dasatinib in Treating Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme or Gliosarcoma

NCT00423735, Phase 2, Completed, National Cancer Institute (NCI); results first posted 2015-01-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Dasatinib in Treating Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme or Gliosarcoma. Trials, record NCT00423735. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00423735

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Dasatinib in Treating Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme or Gliosarcoma
NCT number
NCT00423735
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
64 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
Adult Giant Cell Glioblastoma, Adult Glioblastoma, Adult Gliosarcoma, Recurrent Adult Brain Neoplasm
Interventions
Dasatinib, Pharmacological Study
First posted
2007-01-18
Last updated
2019-07-24
Results first posted
2015-01-06
Limitations and caveats
Designed as a 2-stage study. The protocol was amended after Stage 1 to add Stage 1B allowing intra-patient escalation. Per protocol criteria, the study did not continue to Stage 2.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Patients Achieving 6-month Progression-free Survival (6mPFS)Registration to 6 months
This study utilized a two-stage phase II design (Stage 1B and 2). The primary endpoint of 6-month progression-free survival (6mPFS) would be assessed based on the patients combined from 1B and 2 if the study continued to Stage 2. Null hypothesis = 11%; alternative hypothesis = 25%. Simon's minmax 2-stage design was used with type I and type II error both set at 10%. If the first stage met its criteria (see secondary outcome measure), then accrual would continue, otherwise there would be no further accrual and the alternative hypothesis would be rejected. Following Stage 2 accrual completion and 6 months of follow-up, if 9 or more patients were alive without progression by 6 months, the null hypothesis would be rejected in favor of the alternative.
SecondaryNumber of Patients Achieving Objective Response (Partial or Complete Response) OR 6-month Progression-free Survival (6mPFS)Registration to 6 months
Study design and efficacy determination uses the hybrid endpoint of 6mPFS or complete/partial response of any duration prior to or at 6 months. Null hypothesis = 11%; alternative hypothesis = 25%. Simon's minmax 2-stage design was used with type I and type II error both set at 10%. Stage 1 and 1B: If 2 or fewer patients were alive and progression-free at 6 months or achieved complete/partial response, then there would be no further accrual and the alternative hypothesis would be rejected. Otherwise accrual would continue to a total of 50 analyzable patients to address the primary endpoint. Complete Response: Complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor on consecutive CT or MRI scans at least 1 month apart; off corticosteroids; neurologically stable/improved. Partial Response: ≥ 50% decrease in size of enhancing tumor on consecutive CT or MRI scans at least 1 month apart; corticosteroids stable/reduced; neurologically stable/improved.
SecondaryOverall SurvivalAnalysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 6 months. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)
Survival time is defined as time from randomization to date of death from any cause and is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at the date of last contact. The study is not designed for a comparison of the treatment arms to each other.
SecondaryTreatment Response Rates at Six MonthsFrom registration to 6 months
Best response is assessed using standard criteria for patients with malignant gliomas (Macdonald 1990) as reported by the site. Complete response (CR): Complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor on consecutive CT or MRI scans at least 1 month apart; off corticosteroids; neurologically stable/improved. Partial response (PR): ≥ 50% decrease in size of enhancing tumor on consecutive CT or MRI scans at least 1 month apart; corticosteroids stable/reduced; neurologically stable/improved. Stable disease (SD): Does not qualify for CR, PR, or PD. Progressive disease (PD): ≥ 25% increase in the size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor; neurologically worse; steroids stable/increased. The best tumor response is defined as the best radiographic response for patients evaluable for radiographic response prior to progression, up to six months. The study is not designed for a comparison of the treatment arms to each other.
SecondaryProgression-free SurvivalAnalysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 6 months. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)
Progression-free survival time is measured from randomization to the date of first progression or death, else the last follow-up date on which the patient was reported alive, and is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression is defined as ≥ 25% increase in the size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor, neurologically worse, or steroids stable/increased. The study is not designed for a comparison of the treatment arms to each other.
SecondaryRate of Adverse EventsAnalysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 6 months. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)
The rate of patients' worst overall grade of adverse event is reported. Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v3.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v3.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE. The study is not designed for a comparison of the treatment arms to each other.
SecondaryCorrelation of Molecular Markers and Tumor ResponseFrom registration to 6 months
The following markers were examined: p-SRC, PDGFR, EPHA2, c-KIT. Patients were categorized based on the number of positive molecular markers they had: 2 vs. 3 and 4. Correlation of marker category and best tumor response was tested using Fisher's exact test. The best tumor response is defined as the best radiographic response for patients evaluable for radiographic response prior to progression up to six months. Patients are combined from the two treatment arms.
SecondaryCorrelation of Pharmacokinetic Data With Dosing, Toxicity, and EfficacyAnalysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 6 months. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)Sufficient pharmacokinetic data was not obtained.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Patients Achieving 6-month Progression-free Survival (6mPFS)Registration to 6 monthsEligible patients who started protocol treatment.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patients Achieving Objective Response (Partial or Complete Response) OR 6-month Progression-free Survival (6mPFS)Registration to 6 monthsEligible patients who started protocol treatment.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall SurvivalAnalysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 6 months. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)
Survival time is defined as time from randomization to date of death from any cause and is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at the date of last contact. This analysis was planned to occur when all patients had been potentially followed for at least 6 months. Arms are not compared.
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTreatment Response Rates at Six MonthsFrom registration to 6 monthsEligible patients who started study treatmentpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProgression-free SurvivalAnalysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 6 months. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)Eligible patients who started study treatmentmonthsMEAN
SECONDARYRate of Adverse EventsAnalysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 6 months. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)Eligible patients who started protocol treatmentpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYCorrelation of Molecular Markers and Tumor ResponseFrom registration to 6 monthsEligible patients who started study treatment and whose response was assessedParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCorrelation of Pharmacokinetic Data With Dosing, Toxicity, and EfficacyAnalysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 6 months. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)

Results by group30

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Patients Achieving 6-month Progression-free Survival (6mPFS)Stage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day1participants
Number of Patients Achieving 6-month Progression-free Survival (6mPFS)Stage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day2participants
Number of Patients Achieving Objective Response (Partial or Complete Response) OR 6-month Progression-free Survival (6mPFS)Stage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day1participants
Number of Patients Achieving Objective Response (Partial or Complete Response) OR 6-month Progression-free Survival (6mPFS)Stage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day2participants
Overall SurvivalStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day6.595% Confidence Interval 3.5 to 9.5months
Overall SurvivalStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day8.995% Confidence Interval 5.0 to 11.3months
Treatment Response Rates at Six MonthsStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/DayCR or PR0.0percentage of participants
Treatment Response Rates at Six MonthsStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/DayCR or PR0.0percentage of participants
Treatment Response Rates at Six MonthsStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/DayStable19.0percentage of participants
Treatment Response Rates at Six MonthsStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/DayStable27.6percentage of participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day29
Overall StudySTARTEDStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day35
Overall StudySTARTEDStage 2: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day21
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day29
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDStage 2: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day6
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDStage 2: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day0

Adverse events368

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherBlood/bone marrow - Other:Blood and lymphatic system disordersStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day221
otherBlood/bone marrow - Other:Blood and lymphatic system disordersStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day029
otherHemoglobinBlood and lymphatic system disordersStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day1321
otherHemoglobinBlood and lymphatic system disordersStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day1229
otherCardiac General - Other:Cardiac disordersStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day221
otherCardiac General - Other:Cardiac disordersStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day029
otherMyocardial ischaemiaCardiac disordersStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day121
otherMyocardial ischaemiaCardiac disordersStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day029
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day321
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day029

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day
Total, all-cause mortalityStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day
Total, other adverse eventsStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day2121
Total, other adverse eventsStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day2329
Total, serious adverse eventsStage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day821
Total, serious adverse eventsStage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day1429

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
25758746DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants2

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
U10CA180868NRG Oncology Network Group Operations CenterWOLMARK, NORMAN; Le, Quynh-Thu Xuan; MANNEL, ROBERT S.NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC.NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2014 to 2026NIH RePORTER
U10CA021661Radiation Therapy Oncology GroupCURRAN, WALTER J.AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGYNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2013NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Stage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day vs Stage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day: Number of Patients Achieving Objective Response (Partial or Complete Response) OR 6-month Progression-free Survival (6mPFS)Trial comparisons
Stage 1: Dasatinib 200mg/Day vs Stage 1B: Dasatinib up to 400mg/Day: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00423735

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00423735/results?page=2