ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00437645

Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan/Amlodipine Compared to Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension

NCT00437645, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2011-02-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan/Amlodipine Compared to Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension. Trials, record NCT00437645. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00437645

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan/Amlodipine Compared to Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension
NCT number
NCT00437645
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,183 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Essential Hypertension
Interventions
Valsartan 160 mg capsules, Amlodipine 5 mg capsules, placebo
First posted
2007-02-21
Last updated
2014-11-11
Results first posted
2011-02-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to Week 8Baseline to Week 8
Blood pressure (BP) was measured at trough (24±3 hours post-dose). The arm in which the highest sitting diastolic BP was found at study entry was used for all subsequent readings. If there was \< 0. 5 mmHg difference in BP between the 2 arms, the non-dominant arm was used. At each visit, after the patient was in a sitting position with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor for 5 minutes, systolic and diastolic BP were measured 3 times with an automated BP monitor and appropriate size cuff. Means of the 3 measurements were calculated. A negative change indicates lowered BP.
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With Peripheral Edema From Baseline to Week 8Baseline to Week 8
Only occurrences of peripheral edema quantified as a reported adverse event coded as peripheral edema were included in the analysis. If a patient experienced more than one occurrence of peripheral edema between Day 1 and Week 8, it was only counted once in the analysis.
SecondaryChange in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) From Baseline to Week 8Baseline to Week 8
Blood pressure (BP) was measured at trough (24±3 hours post-dose). The arm in which the highest sitting diastolic BP was found at study entry was used for all subsequent readings. If there was \< 0. 5 mmHg difference in BP between the 2 arms, the non-dominant arm was used. At each visit, after the patient was in a sitting position with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor for 5 minutes, systolic and diastolic BP were measured 3 times with an automated BP monitor and appropriate size cuff. Means of the 3 measurements were calculated. A negative change indicates lowered BP.
SecondaryChange in Mean Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (msSBP, msDBP) From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Blood pressure (BP) was measured at trough (24±3 hours post-dose). The arm in which the highest sitting diastolic BP was found at study entry was used for all subsequent readings. If there was \< 0. 5 mmHg difference in BP between the 2 arms, the non-dominant arm was used. At each visit, after the patient was in a sitting position with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor for 5 minutes, systolic and diastolic BP were measured 3 times with an automated BP monitor and appropriate size cuff. Means of the 3 measurements were calculated. A negative change indicates lowered BP.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Achieving a Systolic Response at Weeks 4, 8, and 12Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Systolic response was defined as msSBP \< 130 mmHg or at least a 20 mmHg reduction from baseline in msSBP at Weeks 4, 8, and 12. Blood pressure (BP) was measured at trough (24±3 hours post-dose). The arm in which the highest sitting diastolic BP was found at study entry was used for all subsequent readings. At each visit, after the patient was in a sitting position with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor for 5 minutes, systolic and diastolic BP were measured 3 times with an automated BP monitor and appropriate size cuff. Means of the 3 measurements were calculated.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to Week 8Baseline to Week 8
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. For patients who discontinued prior to Week 8, the last post-baseline msSBP measurement collected was used for the analysis (last observation carried forward \[LOCF\]).
mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYPercentage of Patients With Peripheral Edema From Baseline to Week 8Baseline to Week 8Safety population: All randomized patients.Percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) From Baseline to Week 8Baseline to Week 8
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. For patients who discontinued prior to Week 8, the last post-baseline msSBP measurement collected was used for the analysis (last observation carried forward \[LOCF\]).
mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in Mean Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (msSBP, msDBP) From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. For patients who discontinued prior to Week 8, the last post-baseline msSBP measurement collected was used for the analysis (last observation carried forward \[LOCF\]).
mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Achieving a Systolic Response at Weeks 4, 8, and 12Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. For patients who discontinued prior to Week 8, the last post-baseline msSBP measurement collected was used for the analysis (last observation carried forward \[LOCF\]).
Percentage of patientsNUMBER

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to Week 8Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg-8.01Standard Error 0.5944mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to Week 8Amlodipine 10 mg-6.30Standard Error 0.6088mmHg
Percentage of Patients With Peripheral Edema From Baseline to Week 8Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg6.6Percentage of patients
Percentage of Patients With Peripheral Edema From Baseline to Week 8Amlodipine 10 mg31.1Percentage of patients
Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) From Baseline to Week 8Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg-4.65Standard Error 0.3616mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) From Baseline to Week 8Amlodipine 10 mg-4.13Standard Error 0.3690mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (msSBP, msDBP) From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mgmsSBP: Week 4 (n=576, 535)-8.40Standard Error 0.5559mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (msSBP, msDBP) From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12Amlodipine 10 mgmsSBP: Week 4 (n=576, 535)-6.48Standard Error 0.5676mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (msSBP, msDBP) From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mgmsSBP: Week 8 (n=567, 510)-8.15Standard Error 0.6065mmHg
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (msSBP, msDBP) From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, and 12Amlodipine 10 mgmsSBP: Week 8 (n=567, 510)-6.11Standard Error 0.6266mmHg

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDValsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg592
Overall StudySTARTEDAmlodipine 10 mg591
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDValsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg557
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAmlodipine 10 mg476
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDValsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg35
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAmlodipine 10 mg115

Adverse events66

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersValsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg43592
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersAmlodipine 10 mg186591
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersValsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg18592
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersAmlodipine 10 mg33591
seriousAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersValsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg1592
seriousAtrial fibrillationCardiac disordersAmlodipine 10 mg0591
seriousGastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disordersValsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg0592
seriousGastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disordersAmlodipine 10 mg1591
seriousGastrointestinal necrosisGastrointestinal disordersValsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg0592
seriousGastrointestinal necrosisGastrointestinal disordersAmlodipine 10 mg1591

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityValsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityAmlodipine 10 mg
Total, other adverse eventsValsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg61592
Total, other adverse eventsAmlodipine 10 mg201591
Total, serious adverse eventsValsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg11592
Total, serious adverse eventsAmlodipine 10 mg8591

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
19196360DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Valsartan/Amlodipine 160/5 mg vs Amlodipine 10 mg: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00437645

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00437645/results?page=2