ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00438464

Finasteride in Treating Patients With Stage II Prostate Cancer Who Are Undergoing Surgery

NCT00438464, Phase 2, Completed, National Cancer Institute (NCI); results first posted 2016-03-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Finasteride in Treating Patients With Stage II Prostate Cancer Who Are Undergoing Surgery. Trials, record NCT00438464. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00438464

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Finasteride in Treating Patients With Stage II Prostate Cancer Who Are Undergoing Surgery
NCT number
NCT00438464
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
204 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate, Stage II Prostate Cancer
Interventions
Finasteride, Placebo, Prostatectomy, Laboratory biomarker analysis
First posted
2007-02-22
Last updated
2016-03-09
Results first posted
2016-03-09
Limitations and caveats
Predefined molecular signature could not easily distinguish GG 4 from GG 3 tumor areas in the placebo arm.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes24

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryComparison of Biomarkers Between Treatment Arms: Percentage Change of Tumor Cells Exhibiting Detectable Staining Within Gleason Grade 3 (GG3) Biomarker Subgroups at ProstatectomyAt prostatectomy following maximum 6 week treatment period
Molecular marker expression based on tissue microarray (TMA) derived from dominant tumor focus. Staining microarrays for high-throughput assessment of candidate gene expression and data modeling constructed with a tissue microarray apparatus and 0.6-mm biopsy cores, representative of tumor grades and scores (Gleason Grades 3 (GG3) and Gleason Grade 4 (GG4)). The percentage of tumor cells exhibiting detectable staining, scored as 0 to 10 where higher score designates more involvement, as applicable for: vascular epithelial growth factor (VEFG), estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), androgen receptor (AR), 3-oxo-5α-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2 (SRD5A2), ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C (UBE2C), and Cleaved Caspase 3 (Caspase). P values are based on non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
PrimaryComparison of Biomarkers Between Treatment Arms: Percentage Change of Tumor Cells Exhibiting Detectable Staining Within Gleason Grade 4 (GG4) Biomarker Subgroup at ProstatectomyAt prostatectomy following maximum 6 week treatment period
Biomarkers using pretreatment and posttreatment values. Staining microarrays for high-throughput assessment of candidate gene expression and data modeling constructed with a tissue microarray apparatus and 0.6-mm biopsy cores, representative of tumor grades and scores (Gleason Grades 3 (GG3) and Gleason Grade 4 (GG4)). The percentage of tumor cells exhibiting detectable staining, scored as 0 to 10 where higher score designates more involvement, as applicable for: VEGF denotes vascular epithelial growth factor, ERβ estrogen receptor beta, AR androgen receptor, SRD5A2, 3-oxo-5α-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2, UBE2C, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C. P values are based on non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
PrimaryComparison of Biomarkers Between Treatment Arms: Percentage Change of Tumor Cells Exhibiting Detectable Staining Within Gleason Grade 3 (GG3) Biomarker Subgroups at ProstatectomyAt prostatectomy following maximum 6 week treatment period.
Molecular marker expression compared between tumor foci using Biomarkers pretreatment and posttreatment values. Staining microarrays for high-throughput assessment of candidate gene expression and data modeling constructed with a tissue microarray apparatus and 0.6-mm biopsy cores, representative of tumor grades and scores (Gleason Grades 3 (GG3) and Gleason Grade 4 (GG4)). The percentage of tumor cells exhibiting detectable staining, scored as 0 to 10 where higher score designates more involvement, as applicable for: VEGF denotes vascular epithelial growth factor, ERβ estrogen receptor beta, AR androgen receptor, SRD5A2, 3-oxo-5α-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2, UBE2C, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C.
PrimaryComparison of Biomarkers Between Treatment Arms: Percentage Change of Tumor Cells Exhibiting Detectable Staining Within Gleason Grade 4 (GG4) Biomarker Subgroup at ProstatectomyAt prostatectomy following maximum 6 week treatment period.
Molecular marker expression compared between tumor foci using biomarkers pretreatment and posttreatment values. Staining microarrays for high-throughput assessment of candidate gene expression and data modeling constructed with a tissue microarray apparatus and 0.6-mm biopsy cores, representative of tumor grades and scores (Gleason Grades 3 (GG3) and Gleason Grade 4 (GG4)). The percentage of tumor cells exhibiting detectable staining, scored as 0 to 10 where higher score designates more involvement, as applicable for: VEGF denotes vascular epithelial growth factor, ERβ estrogen receptor beta, AR androgen receptor, SRD5A2, 3-oxo-5α-steroid 4-dehydrogenase 2, UBE2C, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C.
SecondaryPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason ScoreAssessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomy
Frequency of Grade 3 and Grade 4 tumors in two treatment groups: Participants consist of men with adenocarcinoma of prostate, clinical stage T1c or T2, with Gleason score of 6 or 7 and PSA level \< 10 ng/mL, who are scheduled to undergo prostatectomy. 2005 International Society of Urological Pathologists recommendations for Gleason scoring (GS) used to grade tumors based upon its microscopic appearance: a primary grade is assigned to most common tumor pattern, and a second grade to next most common tumor pattern. Gleason score (GS) is sum of the two Gleason grades, based on scale of 2-10 with lowest numbers indicating slow-growing tumor unlikely to spread and highest numbers indicating an aggressive tumor. Gleason grade = 1-5; Gleason score = 2-10; 5 and 10 indicate worst prognosis. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging describes extent of disease progression utilizing TNM scoring system: Tumor size, Lymph Nodes affected, Metastases. Higher stage cancers are more advanced.
SecondaryPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason Grade -- Specimen (Primary)Assessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomy
Frequency of Grade 3 and Grade 4 tumors in two treatment groups: Participants consist of men with adenocarcinoma of the prostate, clinical stage T1c or T2, with a Gleason score of 6 or 7 and a PSA level \< 10 ng/mL, who are scheduled to undergo prostatectomy.
SecondaryPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason Grade -- Specimen (Secondary)Assessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomy
Frequency of Grade 3, Grade 4 and Grade 5 tumors in two treatment groups: Participants will consist of men with adenocarcinoma of the prostate, clinical stage T1c or T2, with a Gleason score of 6 or 7 and a PSA level \< 10 ng/mL, who are scheduled to undergo prostatectomy.
SecondaryPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) StageAssessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomy
American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system 6th edition (2002) describing amount and spread of cancer body, using TNM. T describes the size of the tumor and any spread of cancer into nearby tissue; N describes spread of cancer to nearby lymph nodes; and M describes metastasis (spread of cancer to other parts of the body). Numbers after the T (such as T1, T2, T3, and T4) describe tumor size and/or amount of spread into nearby structures. The higher the T number, the larger the tumor and/or the more it has grown into nearby tissues where T3a reflects tumor has spread through the capsule on one or both sides; and T3b reflects tumor has invaded one or both seminal vesicles.
SecondaryPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Margin of Resection (MOR)Assessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomy
Edge or border of tissue removed in cancer surgery. The margin is described as negative or clean when the pathologist finds no cancer cells at the edge of the tissue, suggesting that all of the cancer has been removed. The margin is described as positive or involved when the pathologist finds cancer cells at the edge of the tissue, suggesting that all of the cancer has not been removed.
SecondaryPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Lymph Node StatusAssessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomy
Status of cancer spread to lymph nodes; PN0 Cancer that has not spread to the lymph nodes. Cancer that has not spread to the lymph nodes. The N category describes whether the cancer has spread into nearby lymph nodes. NX means the nearby lymph nodes cannot be evaluated. N0 means nearby lymph nodes do not contain cancer. Numbers after the N (such as N1, N2, and N3) describe the size, location, and/or the number of nearby lymph nodes affected by cancer. The higher the N number, the greater the cancer spread to nearby lymph nodes.

Outcomes24

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
SECONDARYPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason ScoreAssessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomyAnalysis includes all evaluable participants. One participant in each arm was excluded due to hormonal therapy effect resulting in lack of assignment of Gleason Grade.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason Grade -- Specimen (Primary)Assessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomyAnalysis includes all evaluable participants. One participant in each arm was excluded due to hormonal therapy effect resulting in lack of assignment of Gleason Grade.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason Grade -- Specimen (Secondary)Assessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomyAnalysis includes all evaluable participants. One participant in each arm was excluded due to hormonal therapy effect resulting in lack of assignment of Gleason Grade.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) StageAssessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomyAll evaluable participants.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Margin of Resection (MOR)Assessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomyAnalysis includes all evaluable participants.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Lymph Node StatusAssessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomyAnalysis includes all evaluable participants.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Cancer FociAssessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomyAnalysis includes all evaluable participants.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Zonal Origin of Tumor Foci Per Radical Prostatectomy Specimen (RPS)Assessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomyAnalysis includes all evaluable participants.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Zonal Origin -- Dominant Tumor FocusAssessment following maximum 6 week treatment period and prostatectomyAnalysis includes all evaluable participants.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason Upgrade Between Biopsy and ProstatectomyBaseline biopsy to prostatectomy following maximum 6 week treatment periodAnalysis includes all evaluable participants.participantsNUMBER

Results by group192

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason ScoreArm I (Finasteride)Gleason Score 612participants
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason ScoreArm II (Placebo)Gleason Score 610participants
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason ScoreArm I (Finasteride)Gleason Score 771participants
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason ScoreArm II (Placebo)Gleason Score 778participants
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason ScoreArm I (Finasteride)Gleason Score 82participants
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason ScoreArm II (Placebo)Gleason Score 81participants
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason ScoreArm I (Finasteride)Gleason Score 93participants
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason ScoreArm II (Placebo)Gleason Score 94participants
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason Grade -- Specimen (Primary)Arm I (Finasteride)Grade 365participants
Pathologic Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens After Treatment: Gleason Grade -- Specimen (Primary)Arm II (Placebo)Grade 375participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm I (Finasteride)103
Overall StudySTARTEDArm II (Placebo)101
Overall StudyReceived Assigned InterventionArm I (Finasteride)89
Overall StudyReceived Assigned InterventionArm II (Placebo)94
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm I (Finasteride)89
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm II (Placebo)94
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm I (Finasteride)14
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm II (Placebo)7

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm I (Finasteride)
Total, all-cause mortalityArm II (Placebo)
Total, other adverse eventsArm I (Finasteride)089
Total, other adverse eventsArm II (Placebo)094
Total, serious adverse eventsArm I (Finasteride)089
Total, serious adverse eventsArm II (Placebo)094

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants2

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource
P30CA016672The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG)KOONG, ALBERTUNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTRNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2026NIH RePORTER
N01CN035159PHASE I and II CLINICAL TRIALS OF CHEMOPREVENTIVE AGENTS-261035159-261035159LIPPMAN, SCOTT M.UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M D ANDERDIVISION OF CANCER PREVENTION AND CONTROL2004 to 2006NIH RePORTER

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Arm I (Finasteride) vs Arm II (Placebo): serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00438464

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00438464/registered?page=2