ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00439647

Efficacy in Reducing Fractures and Safety of Zoledronic Acid in Men With Osteoporosis

NCT00439647, Phase 3, Completed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2011-11-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy in Reducing Fractures and Safety of Zoledronic Acid in Men With Osteoporosis. Trials, record NCT00439647. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00439647

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy in Reducing Fractures and Safety of Zoledronic Acid in Men With Osteoporosis
NCT number
NCT00439647
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,199 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Male Osteoporosis
Interventions
Zoledronic acid 5 mg iv, Placebo
First posted
2007-02-23
Last updated
2017-04-21
Results first posted
2011-11-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months24 Months
Vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. QM(quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) is defined by at least 20% decrease in vertebral height of at least 4mm. If participant had QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit, x-rays from visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative method for VF assessment: Grade1 Mild VF is defined as 20-24% decrease in anterior, middle, and/or posterior vertebral height. Grade2 moderate VF is defined as 25-40% decrease in vertebral height. Grade3 Severe VF is defined as more than 40% decrease in vertebral height
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months12 Months
Vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. QM(quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) is defined by at least 20% decrease in vertebral height of at least 4mm. If participant had QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit, x-rays from visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative method for VF assessment: Grade1 Mild VF is defined as 20-24% decrease in anterior, middle, and/or posterior vertebral height. Grade2 moderate VF is defined as 25-40% decrease in vertebral height. Grade3 Severe VF is defined as more than 40% decrease in vertebral height
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months12 months
Moderate or severe vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. A QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit,x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. Grade 2 moderate VF was defined as a 25-40% reduction in any vertebral height.Grade 3 Severe: VF was defined as more than 40% reduction in any vertebral height.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months24 Months
Moderate or severe vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. A QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit,x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. Grade 2 moderate VF was defined as a 25-40% reduction in any vertebral height.Grade 3 Severe: VF was defined as more than 40% reduction in any vertebral height.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 MonthsBaseline, 12 months
Worsening vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit, x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. A worsening fracture was defined as an SQ reading that was greater than the baseline SQ reading, which was at least 1 (prevalent fracture)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 MonthsBaseline, Month 24
Worsening vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. A QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit,x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. A worsening fracture was defined as an SQ reading that was greater than the baseline SQ reading, which was at least 1 (prevalent fracture)
SecondaryMean Change in Height From Baselinefrom Baseline to 12 months and 24 months
Height was measured using a stadiometer. Two measurements were taken in millimeters (mm), and repeated if the two measurements differed by greater than 4 mm. The average of the two (or four) height measurements was used for analysis
SecondaryNumber of Participants With First Clinical Vertebral Fracture24 months
Clinical vertebral fracture is a painful vertebral fracture which came to clinical attention, e.g., with increased back pain, impairment of mobility or functional limitations. Subjects who did not experience a fracture event were censored at the end of study. End of study was defined as the last visit or date of death, whichever was earlier.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With First Clinical Fracture24 months
Clinical fracture is painful fracture in any site which came to clinical attention, e.g., with increased pain, impaired mobility or functional limitations. Subjects who did not experience fracture were censored at end of study. End of study was defined as the earlier of last visit or date of death.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With First Non-vertebral Fracture24 months
Non-vertebral fracture is any fracture which was not of the vertebrae. Subjects who did not experience a fracture event were censored at the end of study. End of study was defined as the last visit or date of death, whichever was earlier.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months24 Months
Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. In this analysis, missing Month 24 fractures were imputed using LOCF.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months12 Months
Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Patients with a baseline x-ray and a 12M x-ray are included.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months12 months
Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Patients with a baseline x-ray and a 12M x-ray are included.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months24 Months
Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Patients with a baseline x-ray and a 12M x-ray are included.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 MonthsBaseline, 12 months
Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Patients with a baseline x-ray and a 12M x-ray are included.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 MonthsBaseline, Month 24
Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. In this analysis, missing Month 24 fractures were imputed using LOCF.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change in Height From Baselinefrom Baseline to 12 months and 24 months
Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Patients with a baseline x-ray and a 12M x-ray are included.
mmMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With First Clinical Vertebral Fracture24 monthsThe ITT (intent to treat) population consisted of all subjects as randomized.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With First Clinical Fracture24 monthsThe ITT (intent to treat) population consisted of all subjects as randomized.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With First Non-vertebral Fracture24 monthsThe ITT (intent to treat) population consisted of all subjects as randomized.ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group54

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 MonthsZoledronic Acid1.6Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 MonthsPlacebo4.9Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 MonthsZoledronic Acid0.9Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 MonthsPlacebo2.8Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 MonthsZoledronic Acid0.4Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 MonthsPlacebo1.9Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 MonthsZoledronic Acid1.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 MonthsPlacebo3.0Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 MonthsZoledronic Acid1.3Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 MonthsPlacebo2.8Percentage of Participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDZoledronic Acid588
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo611
Overall StudyModified Intent to Treat (mITT)Zoledronic Acid553
Overall StudyModified Intent to Treat (mITT)Placebo574
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDZoledronic Acid530
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo540
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDZoledronic Acid58
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo71

Adverse events558

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherChillsGeneral disordersZoledronic Acid40588
otherChillsGeneral disordersPlacebo5611
otherFatigueGeneral disordersZoledronic Acid40588
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo13611
otherInfluenza like illnessGeneral disordersZoledronic Acid30588
otherInfluenza like illnessGeneral disordersPlacebo14611
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersZoledronic Acid143588
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersPlacebo21611
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsZoledronic Acid30588
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsPlacebo28611

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityZoledronic Acid
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsZoledronic Acid399588
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo256611
Total, serious adverse eventsZoledronic Acid149588
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo154611

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
23113482DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Zoledronic Acid vs Placebo: Number of Participants With First Clinical Vertebral FractureTrial comparisons
Zoledronic Acid vs Placebo: Number of Participants With First Clinical FractureTrial comparisons
Zoledronic Acid vs Placebo: Number of Participants With First Non-vertebral FractureTrial comparisons
Zoledronic Acid vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00439647

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00439647/results?page=2