ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00447980

A Study of Encapsulated Cell Technology (ECT) Implant for Participants With Early Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa

NCT00447980, Phase 2, Completed, Neurotech Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2025-05-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Encapsulated Cell Technology (ECT) Implant for Participants With Early Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa. Trials, record NCT00447980. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00447980

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Encapsulated Cell Technology (ECT) Implant for Participants With Early Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa
NCT number
NCT00447980
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
73 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Neurotech Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Retinitis Pigmentosa
Interventions
NT-501, NT-501
First posted
2007-03-15
Last updated
2025-05-01
Results first posted
2025-05-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Humphrey Visual Fields - Total Sensitivity12 months
The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in Humphrey VFS from baseline to month 12 (Visit 10) as determined by the HVF 30-2 test, comprised of 76 points. The measure was the sum of actual thresholds for all 76 locations.
SecondaryChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityBaseline compared to 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 months
SecondaryMean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityBaseline compared to 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 monthsChange in Humphrey Visual Field Sensitivity over time

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Humphrey Visual Fields - Total Sensitivity12 monthsMITT Population excluding 1 participant from the high dose arm who did not complete any visits subsequent to surgery.dBMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityBaseline compared to 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 monthsMITT Population excluding 1 participant from the high dose arm who did not complete any visits subsequent to surgery.dBMEAN
SECONDARYMean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityBaseline compared to 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 monthsMITT PopulationdBMEAN

Results by group56

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Humphrey Visual Fields - Total SensitivityLow Dose - Implant1.4Standard Deviation 174.58dB
Change in Humphrey Visual Fields - Total SensitivityLow Dose - Sham16.8Standard Deviation 165.41dB
Change in Humphrey Visual Fields - Total SensitivityHigh Dose - Implant-164.8Standard Deviation 115.02dB
Change in Humphrey Visual Fields - Total SensitivityHigh Dose - Sham-66.7Standard Deviation 103.23dB
Change in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityLow Dose - Implant6 Months - Change from BL-1.21Standard Deviation 140.09dB
Change in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityLow Dose - Sham6 Months - Change from BL25.80Standard Deviation 128.34dB
Change in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityHigh Dose - Implant6 Months - Change from BL-135.23Standard Deviation 107.86dB
Change in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityHigh Dose - Sham6 Months - Change from BL-42.99Standard Deviation 82.85dB
Change in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityLow Dose - Implant12 Months - Change from BL1.35Standard Deviation 174.58dB
Change in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityLow Dose - Sham12 Months - Change from BL16.75Standard Deviation 165.41dB

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDParticipants That Received Low Dose NT-501 Implant Surgery and Sham Surgery in Fellow Eye2323
Overall StudySTARTEDSham Treatment in Fellow Eye for Low Dose Arm2323
Overall StudySTARTEDParticipants That Received High Dose NT-501 Implant Surgery and Sham Surgery in Fellow Eye5050
Overall StudySTARTEDSham Treatment in Fellow Eye for High Dose Implant Arm5050
Overall StudyNT-501 Surgery CompletedParticipants That Received Low Dose NT-501 Implant Surgery and Sham Surgery in Fellow Eye2020
Overall StudyNT-501 Surgery CompletedSham Treatment in Fellow Eye for Low Dose Arm2020
Overall StudyNT-501 Surgery CompletedParticipants That Received High Dose NT-501 Implant Surgery and Sham Surgery in Fellow Eye4848
Overall StudyNT-501 Surgery CompletedSham Treatment in Fellow Eye for High Dose Implant Arm4848
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDParticipants That Received Low Dose NT-501 Implant Surgery and Sham Surgery in Fellow Eye1818
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSham Treatment in Fellow Eye for Low Dose Arm1818

Adverse events104

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnterior Chamber CellEye disordersLow Dose7207
otherAnterior Chamber CellEye disordersHigh Dose9489
otherAnterior Chamber FlareEye disordersLow Dose5205
otherAnterior Chamber FlareEye disordersHigh Dose9489
otherAsthenopiaEye disordersLow Dose2202
otherAsthenopiaEye disordersHigh Dose1481
otherCataract SubcapsularEye disordersLow Dose1201
otherCataract SubcapsularEye disordersHigh Dose2482
otherConjunctival HaemorrhageEye disordersLow Dose172017
otherConjunctival HaemorrhageEye disordersHigh Dose384838

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLow Dose020
Total, all-cause mortalityHigh Dose048
Total, other adverse eventsLow Dose2020
Total, other adverse eventsHigh Dose4848
Total, serious adverse eventsLow Dose120
Total, serious adverse eventsHigh Dose448

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
21087953DERIVEDPubMed
23049090DERIVEDPubMed
23668681DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Low Dose vs High Dose: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Low Dose vs High Dose: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00447980

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00447980/results?page=2