ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00457392

A Study In Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer To Test If Erlotinib Plus SU011248 Is Better Than Erlotinib Alone

NCT00457392, Phase 3, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2011-08-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study In Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer To Test If Erlotinib Plus SU011248 Is Better Than Erlotinib Alone. Trials, record NCT00457392. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00457392

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study In Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer To Test If Erlotinib Plus SU011248 Is Better Than Erlotinib Alone
NCT number
NCT00457392
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
960 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Carcinoma, Non-Small Cell Lung
Interventions
erlotinib, sunitinib, erlotinib, placebo
First posted
2007-04-06
Last updated
2013-10-29
Results first posted
2011-08-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)Baseline to death or 28 days after last dose for the last participantOverall survival is the duration from assignment to study medication to death. For participants who are alive, overall survival is censored at the last contact.
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)Baseline to disease progression or death due to any cause or 28 days after last dose
Time in weeks from assignment to study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease \[PD\]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where the outcome was "Death").
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)Baseline to disease progression or discontinuation from study or 28 days after last dose
Percentage of participants with OR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0. Confirmed response are those that persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR are defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR are those with at least 30% decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent.
SecondaryDuration of Response (DR)Baseline to disease progression or death or discontinuation from study or 28 days after last dose
Time in weeks from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 7.
SecondaryOne-year Survival ProbabilityBaseline until death or until 28 days after last dose for the last participantThe 1 year survival probability was defined as the probability of survival at one year after the date of the start of the study treatment based on the Kaplan Meier estimate.
SecondaryEuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D)- Health State Profile Utility ScoreBaseline and End of Treatment (EOT) or Withdrawal
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (eg, "confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates better health state.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS)Baseline to death or 28 days after last dose for the last participant
The Full Analysis (FA) set included all participants who were randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to actual randomization, regardless of whether participants received study drug according to the randomization schedule, or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS)Baseline to disease progression or death due to any cause or 28 days after last dose
The FA set included all participants who were randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to actual randomization, regardless of whether participants received study drug according to the randomization schedule, or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.
WeeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)Baseline to disease progression or discontinuation from study or 28 days after last dose
The FA set included all participants who were randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to actual randomization, regardless of whether participants received study drug according to the randomization schedule, or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Response (DR)Baseline to disease progression or death or discontinuation from study or 28 days after last doseDR was calculated for the subgroup of participants from the FA set, with a confirmed objective tumor response.WeeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYOne-year Survival ProbabilityBaseline until death or until 28 days after last dose for the last participant
The FA set included all participants who were randomized, with study drug assignment designated according to actual randomization, regardless of whether participants received study drug according to the randomization schedule, or received a different drug from that to which they were randomized.
Percent chance of survivalNUMBER
SECONDARYEuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D)- Health State Profile Utility ScoreBaseline and End of Treatment (EOT) or Withdrawal
Patients Reported Outcome (PRO) Analysis Set included participants from the FA population who had at least one EQ-5D assessment while on treatment. The 'n' signifies those participants who received study drug and were evaluated for this measure at the timepoint for each group respectively.
Units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Survival (OS)Sunitinib + Erlotinib9.095% Confidence Interval 8.4 to 10.2Months
Overall Survival (OS)Erlotinib8.595% Confidence Interval 7.4 to 9.8Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Sunitinib + Erlotinib15.595% Confidence Interval 13.1 to 16.1Weeks
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Erlotinib8.795% Confidence Interval 8.3 to 12.8Weeks
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)Sunitinib + Erlotinib10.6095% Confidence Interval 8.01 to 13.73Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)Erlotinib6.9095% Confidence Interval 4.78 to 9.52Percentage of participants
Duration of Response (DR)Sunitinib + Erlotinib39.695% Confidence Interval 31.3 to 48.9Weeks
Duration of Response (DR)Erlotinib32.395% Confidence Interval 24.2 to 48.0Weeks
One-year Survival ProbabilitySunitinib + Erlotinib40.095% Confidence Interval 35.4 to 44.2Percent chance of survival
One-year Survival ProbabilityErlotinib37.095% Confidence Interval 32.8 to 41.6Percent chance of survival

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSunitinib + Erlotinib480
Overall StudySTARTEDErlotinib480
Overall StudyTreatedSunitinib + Erlotinib473
Overall StudyTreatedErlotinib477
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSunitinib + Erlotinib0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDErlotinib0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSunitinib + Erlotinib480
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDErlotinib480

Adverse events1,806

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSunitinib + Erlotinib51473
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersErlotinib23477
otherAnaemia megaloblasticBlood and lymphatic system disordersSunitinib + Erlotinib1473
otherAnaemia megaloblasticBlood and lymphatic system disordersErlotinib0477
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSunitinib + Erlotinib1473
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersErlotinib0477
otherGranulocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSunitinib + Erlotinib2473
otherGranulocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersErlotinib0477
otherHaemorrhagic diathesisBlood and lymphatic system disordersSunitinib + Erlotinib1473
otherHaemorrhagic diathesisBlood and lymphatic system disordersErlotinib0477

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySunitinib + Erlotinib
Total, all-cause mortalityErlotinib
Total, other adverse eventsSunitinib + Erlotinib463473
Total, other adverse eventsErlotinib461477
Total, serious adverse eventsSunitinib + Erlotinib207473
Total, serious adverse eventsErlotinib181477

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Sunitinib + Erlotinib vs Erlotinib: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00457392

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00457392/events?page=2