ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00463606

A Multicenter Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium Combination Therapy to Monotherapy in Subjects With Dyslipidemia

NCT00463606, Phase 3, Completed, AstraZeneca; results first posted 2012-08-01

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Multicenter Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium Combination Therapy to Monotherapy in Subjects With Dyslipidemia. Trials, record NCT00463606. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00463606

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Multicenter Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium Combination Therapy to Monotherapy in Subjects With Dyslipidemia
NCT number
NCT00463606
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
760 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Conditions
Hypercholesterolemia, Dyslipidemia
Interventions
ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium, ABT-335, rosuvastatin calcium
First posted
2007-04-20
Last updated
2012-10-03
Results first posted
2012-08-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 Weeks
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
PrimaryMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Triglycerides (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in triglycerides, with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
PrimaryMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy.
Secondary
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus ABT-335 135 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)
Baseline to 12 Weeks
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus ABT-335 135 mg monotherapy.
Secondary
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Rosuvastatin 5 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)
Baseline to 12 Weeks
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
SecondaryMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Very-low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 Weeks
The mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
SecondaryMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in apolipoprotein B (ApoB), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
SecondaryMedian Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 Weeks
The median percent change from baseline to the final visit in high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.
SecondaryMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Total Cholesterol (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 WeeksThe mean percent change from baseline to the final visit in total cholesterol, with ABT-335 135 mg in combination with rosuvastatin 5 mg versus rosuvastatin 5 mg monotherapy.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 Weeks
Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.
percent changeMEAN
PRIMARYMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Triglycerides (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 Weeks
Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for triglycerides. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.
percent changeMEAN
PRIMARYMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 Weeks
Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARY
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus ABT-335 135 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)
Baseline to 12 Weeks
Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for non-HDL-C. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARY
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Rosuvastatin 5 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)
Baseline to 12 Weeks
Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for non-HDL-C. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Very-low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 Weeks
Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for VLDL-C. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 Weeks
Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for ApoB. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYMedian Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 Weeks
Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for hsCRP. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.
percent changeMEDIAN
SECONDARYMean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Total Cholesterol (Full Analysis Set)Baseline to 12 Weeks
Full Analysis Set was used and was defined as all randomized participants who had both a baseline value and at least 1 post-baseline value for total cholesterol. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute values for participants missing a post-baseline visit value. Only post-baseline values were carried forward.
percent changeMEAN

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium23.0Standard Error 1.33percent change
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)Rosuvastatin Calcium12.4Standard Error 1.32percent change
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Triglycerides (Full Analysis Set)ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium-40.3Standard Error 1.89percent change
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Triglycerides (Full Analysis Set)Rosuvastatin Calcium-17.5Standard Error 1.88percent change
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium-28.7Standard Error 1.33percent change
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) (Full Analysis Set)ABT-335-4.1Standard Error 1.31percent change
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus ABT-335 135 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)
ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium-37.4Standard Error 1.06percent change
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus ABT-335 135 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)
ABT-335-16.0Standard Error 1.05percent change
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Rosuvastatin 5 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)
ABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium-37.4Standard Error 1.06percent change
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to the Final Visit in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), With ABT-335 135 mg in Combination With Rosuvastatin 5 mg Versus Rosuvastatin 5 mg Monotherapy (Full Analysis Set)
Rosuvastatin Calcium-31.8Standard Error 1.05percent change

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium253
Overall StudySTARTEDABT-335254
Overall StudySTARTEDRosuvastatin Calcium251
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium212
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDABT-335220
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRosuvastatin Calcium231
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium41
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDABT-33534
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRosuvastatin Calcium20

Adverse events72

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium16253
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersABT-3356254
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersRosuvastatin Calcium2251
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium6253
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsABT-33515254
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsRosuvastatin Calcium8251
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium11253
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersABT-33511254
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersRosuvastatin Calcium14251
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium28253

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium
Total, all-cause mortalityABT-335
Total, all-cause mortalityRosuvastatin Calcium
Total, other adverse eventsABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium52253
Total, other adverse eventsABT-33541254
Total, other adverse eventsRosuvastatin Calcium45251
Total, serious adverse eventsABT-335 and Rosuvastatin Calcium7253
Total, serious adverse eventsABT-3356254
Total, serious adverse eventsRosuvastatin Calcium4251

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
20953684DERIVEDPubMed
21174145DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00463606

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00463606/events?page=2