ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00469456

Effect of Memantine on Functional Communication in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

NCT00469456, Phase 4, Completed, Forest Laboratories; results first posted 2009-12-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effect of Memantine on Functional Communication in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease. Trials, record NCT00469456. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00469456

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effect of Memantine on Functional Communication in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease
NCT number
NCT00469456
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
265 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Forest Laboratories
Conditions
Alzheimer's Disease
Interventions
Memantine, placebo
First posted
2007-05-04
Last updated
2009-12-24
Results first posted
2009-12-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Functional Linguistic Communication Inventory (FLCI) at Week 12Baseline to Week 12
FLCI is a standardized \& validated instrument for evaluating functional communication in pts with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's that can be used to obtain Baseline information \& to track patients' capabilities thereafter. The FLCI evaluates 10 areas: greeting and naming, answering questions, writing, sign comprehension, object-to-picture matching, word reading and comprehension, following commands, pantomime, gesture, and conversation. The FLCI total score ranges from 0 to 87, a higher score denotes better functional communication, and takes approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Secondary
Change From Baseline in American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults (ASHA FACS) [Total Score of Social Communication and Communication of Basic Needs Subscores] at Week 12
Baseline to Week 12
The ASHA FACS assesses \& measures functional communication skills of adults with speech, language, \& cognitive communication disorders. The measure, which comprises 43 items and takes approximately 20 minutes to complete, assesses functional communication in four areas: social communication; communication of basic needs; reading, writing, and number concepts; and daily planning. Total score of subdomains \[Social Communication and Communication of Basic Needs\] ranges from 0-196. A higher score denotes better communication.

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Functional Linguistic Communication Inventory (FLCI) at Week 12Baseline to Week 12
Primary efficacy analysis was based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population. The ITT Population will consist of all patients in the Safety Population who had at least one post-Baseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter, FLCI. The last-observation-carried-forward approach was used to impute missing post-Baseline values.
Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults (ASHA FACS) [Total Score of Social Communication and Communication of Basic Needs Subscores] at Week 12
Baseline to Week 12The secondary efficacy analysis was based on the ITT Population. The last-observation-carried-forward approach was used to impute missing post-Baseline values.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Functional Linguistic Communication Inventory (FLCI) at Week 12Placebo-0.6Standard Error 0.59Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Functional Linguistic Communication Inventory (FLCI) at Week 12Memantine0.7Standard Error 0.57Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults (ASHA FACS) [Total Score of Social Communication and Communication of Basic Needs Subscores] at Week 12
Placebo-5.3Standard Error 2.06Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults (ASHA FACS) [Total Score of Social Communication and Communication of Basic Needs Subscores] at Week 12
Memantine0.5Standard Error 1.99Units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo129
Overall StudySTARTEDMemantine135
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo120
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMemantine131
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMemantine4

Adverse events36

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersPlacebo2129
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersMemantine7135
seriousSyncopeNervous system disordersPlacebo2129
seriousSyncopeNervous system disordersMemantine0135
seriousUrinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo2129
seriousUrinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestationsMemantine0135
seriousAbdominal PainGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0129
seriousAbdominal PainGastrointestinal disordersMemantine1135
seriousAngina UnstableCardiac disordersPlacebo0129
seriousAngina UnstableCardiac disordersMemantine1135

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityMemantine
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo2129
Total, other adverse eventsMemantine7135
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo13129
Total, serious adverse eventsMemantine4135

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Memantine vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00469456

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00469456/events?page=2