ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00477295

A Double-blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Zonisamide and Carbamazepine as Monotherapy, in Newly Diagnosed Partial Epilepsy

NCT00477295, Phase 3, Completed, Eisai Inc.; results first posted 2013-02-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Double-blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Zonisamide and Carbamazepine as Monotherapy, in Newly Diagnosed Partial Epilepsy. Trials, record NCT00477295. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00477295

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Double-blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Zonisamide and Carbamazepine as Monotherapy, in Newly Diagnosed Partial Epilepsy
NCT number
NCT00477295
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
583 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Conditions
Epilepsy
Interventions
Zonisamide, Carbamazepine
First posted
2007-05-23
Last updated
2015-12-24
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2006-000156-40
Results first posted
2013-02-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 26-weeks During the Maintenance PhaseWeek 31 through Week 109
A subject achieved a 26-week seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 26 weeks while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 12-months During the FDP and Maintenance PeriodWeek 5 through Week 109
A subject achieved a 12-month seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 12 months while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
SecondaryAnalysis of Time to Drop Out Due to an Adverse Event (AE)Week 1 through Week 109
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the medicinal product. Adverse events were identified by: any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom or disease temporarily associated with the use of a medicinal product; any new disease or exacerbation of an existing disease; any deterioration in nonprotocol-required measurements of laboratory values or other clinical test; and recurrence of an intermittent medical condition not present at Baseline.
SecondaryAnalysis of Time to Drop Out Due to Lack of EfficacyWeek 1 through Week 109
Lack of efficacy was evaluated by the subject and on the basis of whether zonisamide and carbamazepine gave the subject at least a 26-week seizure free rate. The subject could withdraw at any time due to lack of efficacy.
SecondaryTime to 6-months Seizure FreedomWeek 5 through Week 83
A subject achieved a 6-months seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 6-months while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
SecondaryTime to 12-months Seizure FreedomWeek 5 through Week 83
A subject achieved a 12-month seizure-free period if they were free of all seizures, regardless of seizure type, for 12-months while receiving the same dose. The occurrence of seizures was documented in the seizure diary, which was maintained by the subject and reviewed at each following visit.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total ABNAS Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
The Aldenkamp-Baker Neuropsychological Assessment Scale(ABNAS) is a subject based questionnaire to measure subjective perceived drug-related cognitive impairments. The ABNAS measured seven critical domains of cognition(tiredness/fatigue,hyperexcitability, slowing(mental and motor),memory impairment,attention disorders,impairment of motor coordination, and language disorders). The total score ranged from 0 to 72, with a higher score reflecting a high level of problems.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Bond and Lader VAS Mood Sub-Scores at Maintenance Period Visit 1Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
The Bond-Lader Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is made up of 16 pairs of alternative descriptors of mood and attention at either end of a 10 cm line. Subjects were asked to rate their feelings at the time of assessment by indicating the point on the line which best represent their mood. Each item was scored by measuring the position relative to the left hand end of the line and levels of anxiety, sedation, and dysphoria were then calculated from the combined scores of selected items. The scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a high score reflecting a high level of anxiety, sedation or dysphoria.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in QOLIE-31-P Overall Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
The Quality of Life in Epilepsy - Problems(QOLIE-31-P) was completed by the patient and contained 30 items covering seven subscales(seizure worry, overall Quality of Life (QOL),emotional well-being,energy-fatigue, cognition,medication effects and social function) and one item covering health status. It also included seven items addressing overall distress related to each subscale, an item addressing the relative importance of each subscale topic, and an item addressing perception of overall change in QOL at the end of the study. A high score reflects a good QOL. The following scale range is a sample of 1 of the 7 of the subscales: 10 (Best possible quality of life) - 0 (Worst possible quality of life); Rand Corporation QOLIE-31 Scoring Manual was used. The QOLIE-31 overall score is calculated by summing the product of each scale score times its weight and summing overall all scales.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SF-36 Aggregate Mental and Physical Component Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)
The Short Form 36 Health and Well-Being Questionnaire (SF-36) is a 36-item generic health related QOL instrument covering the following domains: physical functioning, role-physical,bodily pain, general health, social functioning,role-emotional, mental health, and vitality. It yields a profile of eight scores, one for each domain, and physical and mental health summary measures. Each domain is described by a score ranging from 0 to 100, for a range of total possible scoes of 0-400 for physical and 0-400 for mental. An increase represents an improvement, whereas a decrease reflects a worsening.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 26-weeks During the Maintenance PhaseWeek 31 through Week 109Per Protocol Population: All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and who had no major protocol violations.Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 12-months During the FDP and Maintenance PeriodWeek 5 through Week 109Per Protocol Population. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYAnalysis of Time to Drop Out Due to an Adverse Event (AE)Week 1 through Week 109Per Protocol PopulationMedian DaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYAnalysis of Time to Drop Out Due to Lack of EfficacyWeek 1 through Week 109Per Protocol PopulationMedian DaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to 6-months Seizure FreedomWeek 5 through Week 83Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population - randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication.DaysMEAN
SECONDARYTime to 12-months Seizure FreedomWeek 5 through Week 83ITT PopulationDaysMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total ABNAS Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)Intent-to-Treat Population: All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication. This was measured using Observed Case (OC).Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Bond and Lader VAS Mood Sub-Scores at Maintenance Period Visit 1Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)Intent-to-Treat Population. This was measured using Observed Case (OC).Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in QOLIE-31-P Overall Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)Intent-to-Treat Population. This was measured using Observed Case (OC).Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in SF-36 Aggregate Mental and Physical Component Score at Maintenance Period Visit 1Baseline and Maintenance Period Visit 1 (Week 31 to Week 83)Intent-to-Treat Population. This was measured using Observed Case (OC).Scores on a ScaleMEAN

Results by group56

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 26-weeks During the Maintenance PhaseZonisamide79.4Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 26-weeks During the Maintenance PhaseCarbamazepine83.7Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 12-months During the FDP and Maintenance PeriodZonisamide67.6Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Seizure Freedom for 12-months During the FDP and Maintenance PeriodCarbamazepine74.7Percentage of participants
Analysis of Time to Drop Out Due to an Adverse Event (AE)ZonisamideNAStandard Error NAMedian Days
Analysis of Time to Drop Out Due to an Adverse Event (AE)CarbamazepineNAStandard Error NAMedian Days
Analysis of Time to Drop Out Due to Lack of EfficacyZonisamide722Standard Error NAMedian Days
Analysis of Time to Drop Out Due to Lack of EfficacyCarbamazepineNAStandard Error NAMedian Days
Time to 6-months Seizure FreedomZonisamide222.7Standard Deviation 49.78Days
Time to 6-months Seizure FreedomCarbamazepine220.4Standard Deviation 46.31Days

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDZonisamide282
Overall StudySTARTEDCarbamazepine301
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDZonisamide161
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCarbamazepine192
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDZonisamide121
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCarbamazepine109

Adverse events92

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherheadacheNervous system disordersZonisamide29281
otherheadacheNervous system disordersCarbamazepine37300
othersomnolenceNervous system disordersZonisamide17281
othersomnolenceNervous system disordersCarbamazepine23300
otherdizzinessNervous system disordersZonisamide11281
otherdizzinessNervous system disordersCarbamazepine23300
otherweight decreasedInvestigationsZonisamide19281
otherweight decreasedInvestigationsCarbamazepine0300
otherdecreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersZonisamide22281
otherdecreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersCarbamazepine5300

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityZonisamide
Total, all-cause mortalityCarbamazepine
Total, other adverse eventsZonisamide72281
Total, other adverse eventsCarbamazepine69300
Total, serious adverse eventsZonisamide15281
Total, serious adverse eventsCarbamazepine17300

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
22683226DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Zonisamide vs Carbamazepine: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00477295

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00477295/results?page=2