ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00491894

Safety and Efficacy Study of Oral Glycopyrrolate Liquid for the Treatment of Pathologic (Chronic Moderate to Severe) Drooling in Pediatric Patients 3 to 18 Years of Age With Cerebral Palsy or Other Neurologic Conditions

NCT00491894, Phase 3, Completed, Shionogi; results first posted 2012-07-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy Study of Oral Glycopyrrolate Liquid for the Treatment of Pathologic (Chronic Moderate to Severe) Drooling in Pediatric Patients 3 to 18 Years of Age With Cerebral Palsy or Other Neurologic Conditions. Trials, record NCT00491894. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00491894

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy Study of Oral Glycopyrrolate Liquid for the Treatment of Pathologic (Chronic Moderate to Severe) Drooling in Pediatric Patients 3 to 18 Years of Age With Cerebral Palsy or Other Neurologic Conditions
NCT number
NCT00491894
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
137 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Shionogi
Conditions
Cerebral Palsy, Neurological Conditions, Mental Retardation, Sialorrhea
Interventions
Oral Glycopyrrolate Liquid
First posted
2007-06-26
Last updated
2012-07-09
Results first posted
2012-07-09
Limitations and caveats
There were no limitations of the trial

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion of Responders According to the Modified Teacher's Drooling Scale (mTDS)6 months
The primary efficacy variable was patient's response status using the change from baseline to Week 24 evaluations of the mTDS assessment. Each patient was classified as a responder or non-responder according to the change in their mean mTDS rating from baseline to Week 24. Responders were patients who had at least a 3-point decrease in mTDS rating from baseline
SecondaryParent/Caregiver's Assessment of the Extent of Drooling Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline
Parents/caregivers were to complete a 10 cm "Parent/Caregiver's Assessment of Extent of Drooling for the Day" VAS assessment (0 = normal; 10 = extremely wet) to provide an overall assessment of the extent of drooling for that day.
SecondaryParent/Caregiver's Assessment of the Extent of Drooling Using VASWeek 24
Parents/caregivers were to complete a 10 cm "Parent/Caregiver's Assessment of Extent of Drooling for the Day" VAS assessment (0 = normal; 10 = extremely wet) to provide an overall assessment of the extent of drooling for that day.
SecondaryParent/Caregiver's Global Assessment of TreatmentWeek 24
The parent/caregiver performed an overall evaluation of glycopyrrolate liquid for the treatment of drooling, benefits, and side effects over the duration of the study. The parent/caregiver selected one of the following choices to assess if 'This is a worthwhile treatment': 1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = neutral, 4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree. A dichotomous global assessment was also performed and summarized with the categories 'responder' (strongly agree and agree responses aggregated) and 'non-responder'(neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree responses aggregated)
SecondaryInvestigator's Global Assessment of TreatmentWeek 24
The investigator performed an overall evaluation of glycopyrrolate liquid for the treatment of drooling, benefits, and side effects over the duration of the study. The investigator selected one of the following choices to assess if 'This is a worthwhile treatment': 1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = neutral, 4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree. A dichotomous global assessment was also performed and summarized with the categories 'responder' (strongly agree and agree responses aggregated) and 'non-responder' (neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree responses aggregated)

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProportion of Responders According to the Modified Teacher's Drooling Scale (mTDS)6 months
The analysis was done by intention to treat method. For purposes of statistical estimation, patients who dropped out due to lack of efficacy had their worst observation carried forward. Patients who dropped out for reasons other than lack of efficacy had their last observation carried forward
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYParent/Caregiver's Assessment of the Extent of Drooling Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)BaselineVAS scoreMEAN
SECONDARYParent/Caregiver's Assessment of the Extent of Drooling Using VASWeek 24VAS scoreMEAN
SECONDARYParent/Caregiver's Global Assessment of TreatmentWeek 24The analysis for parent/caregiver's Global Assessment was done by intention to treat methodParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYInvestigator's Global Assessment of TreatmentWeek 24The analysis for investigator's Global Assessment was done by intention to treat methodParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group11

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion of Responders According to the Modified Teacher's Drooling Scale (mTDS)Patients With Chronic DroolingResponders68Participants
Proportion of Responders According to the Modified Teacher's Drooling Scale (mTDS)Patients With Chronic DroolingNon-Responders62Participants
Proportion of Responders According to the Modified Teacher's Drooling Scale (mTDS)Patients With Chronic DroolingMissing7Participants
Parent/Caregiver's Assessment of the Extent of Drooling Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Patients With Chronic Drooling6.56Standard Deviation 2.34VAS score
Parent/Caregiver's Assessment of the Extent of Drooling Using VASPatients With Chronic Drooling3.21Standard Deviation 2.20VAS score
Parent/Caregiver's Global Assessment of TreatmentPatients With Chronic DroolingResponders101Participants
Parent/Caregiver's Global Assessment of TreatmentPatients With Chronic DroolingNon-Responders20Participants
Parent/Caregiver's Global Assessment of TreatmentPatients With Chronic DroolingMissing16Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment of TreatmentPatients With Chronic DroolingResponders109Participants
Investigator's Global Assessment of TreatmentPatients With Chronic DroolingNon-Responders18Participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPatients With Chronic Drooling137
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPatients With Chronic Drooling103
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPatients With Chronic Drooling34

Adverse events46

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPatients With Chronic Drooling28137
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPatients With Chronic Drooling24137
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersPatients With Chronic Drooling24137
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersPatients With Chronic Drooling15137
otherLip dryGastrointestinal disordersPatients With Chronic Drooling5137
otherOtitis mediaInfections and infestationsPatients With Chronic Drooling11137
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsPatients With Chronic Drooling10137
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPatients With Chronic Drooling11137
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsPatients With Chronic Drooling7137
otherPharyngitis streptococcalInfections and infestationsPatients With Chronic Drooling7137

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPatients With Chronic Drooling
Total, other adverse eventsPatients With Chronic Drooling122137
Total, serious adverse eventsPatients With Chronic Drooling14137

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
22298950DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00491894

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00491894/events?page=2