ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00498628

Study of the Effectiveness of Quetiapine for the Treatment of Alcohol Dependency

NCT00498628, Phase 2, Completed, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA); results first posted 2012-05-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of the Effectiveness of Quetiapine for the Treatment of Alcohol Dependency. Trials, record NCT00498628. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00498628

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of the Effectiveness of Quetiapine for the Treatment of Alcohol Dependency
NCT number
NCT00498628
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
224 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
Conditions
Alcoholism, Alcohol Abuse
Interventions
Quetiapine fumarate, Placebo
First posted
2007-07-10
Last updated
2019-03-19
Results first posted
2012-05-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Heavy Drinking DaysWeeks 3 - 11A heavy drinking day is defined as 5 or more drinks for men and 4 or more drinks for women during a 24 hour period.
SecondaryPercent Days AbstinentWeeks 3-11Timeline Follow-back drinking data is used to calculate the % of days abstinent per week during Weeks 3-11
SecondaryDrinks Per Drinking DayStudy Weeks 3-11Timeline Follow Back daily drinking data used to calculate the weekly mean drinks per drinking day
SecondaryDrinks Per DayStudy Weeks 3-11Timeline Follow Back daily drinking data used to calculate the weekly mean drinks per day
SecondaryPercent Very Heavy Drinking DayStudy Weeks 3-11Timeline Follow Back data used to calculate the % of very heavy drinking days per week. Heavy drinking is 10+ drinks per day for females and 12+ drinks per day for males
SecondaryPercent Subjects AbstinentStudy Weeks 3-11Timeline Follow Back data used to calculate the % of subjects that maintained abstinence weeks 3-11.
SecondaryPercent Subjects With no Heavy Drinking DayStudy Weeks 3-11Timeline Follow Back data used to calculate the % of subjects that didn't have a heavy drinking day during study weeks 3-11.
SecondaryDrinking Consequences ScoreWeeks 6 & 12
Drinkers Inventory of Consequences (DrInC) - Alcohol-related problems are determined using the DrInC (Miller et al., 1995). The DrInC is a self-administered 50-item questionnaire designed to measure adverse consequences of alcohol abuse in five areas: Interpersonal, Physical, Social, Impulsive, and Intrapersonal. Each scale provides a lifetime and past 3-month measure of adverse consequences, and scales can be combined to assess total adverse consequences. We used a modified version of the DrInC that just included the 45-items that summed the Interpersonal, Physical, Social, and Impulsivity items. This total score (min=0, max=135) was analyzed in this study with high scores indicative of more alcohol-related consequences (a poor outcome for a given study participant). The DrInC was assessed at study weeks 6 and 12. Analyses averaged across these weeks.
SecondaryPenn Alcohol Craving Score (PACS_Weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
The Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) is a five-item, self-report measure that includes questions about the frequency, intensity, and duration of craving, the ability to resist drinking, and asks for an overall rating of craving for alcohol for the previous week (Flannery et al., 1999). The summed total score of the 5 items was used in the analysis (min=0, max=30) with higher scores indicative of higher craving for alcohol (a poor outcome). Based on clinical study results, the PACS has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of alcohol craving and can predict subjects at risk for subsequent relapse. The PACS was assessed at study weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. Analyses averaged across these weeks.
SecondaryMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Weeks 3-11
The MADRS is an observer rating scale that has proven to be an efficient and practical measure of depression (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979). The scale was constructed to be sensitive to changes in treatment effects. Its capacity to differentiate between responders and non-responders to antidepressant treatment has been shown to be comparable to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, another established measure of depressive symptomatology, but the MADRS has greater sensitivity to change during the course of a depressive phase. It has exhibited high inter-rater reliability and appears to be oriented more towards psychic as opposed to somatic aspects of depression. The MADRS is the sum of the 10-item in a checklist where items are rated on a scale of 0 to 6 with anchors at 2-point intervals. Scores range from 0 to 60. Higher scores are indicative of greater depressive symptoms (a poor outcome). The MADRS was assessed at weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. Analyses averaged across these weeks.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Heavy Drinking DaysWeeks 3 - 11Intention to Treatpercentage of heavy drinking daysLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Days AbstinentWeeks 3-11percentage of days abstinentLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDrinks Per Drinking DayStudy Weeks 3-11drinks per drinking dayLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDrinks Per DayStudy Weeks 3-11drinks per dayLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Very Heavy Drinking DayStudy Weeks 3-11percentage heavy drinking daysLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Subjects AbstinentStudy Weeks 3-11ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercent Subjects With no Heavy Drinking DayStudy Weeks 3-11ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYDrinking Consequences ScoreWeeks 6 & 12score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPenn Alcohol Craving Score (PACS_Weeks 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Weeks 3-11score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Heavy Drinking DaysQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management37.1Standard Error 3.5percentage of heavy drinking days
Percent Heavy Drinking DaysSugar Pill Plus Medical Management37.9Standard Error 3.34percentage of heavy drinking days
Percent Days AbstinentQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management49.5Standard Error 3.71percentage of days abstinent
Percent Days AbstinentSugar Pill Plus Medical Management47.1Standard Error 3.54percentage of days abstinent
Drinks Per Drinking DayQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management6.2Standard Error .47drinks per drinking day
Drinks Per Drinking DaySugar Pill Plus Medical Management6.3Standard Error .45drinks per drinking day
Drinks Per DayQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management4.3Standard Error 0.43drinks per day
Drinks Per DaySugar Pill Plus Medical Management4.4Standard Error 0.41drinks per day
Percent Very Heavy Drinking DayQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management16.5Standard Error 2.56percentage heavy drinking days
Percent Very Heavy Drinking DaySugar Pill Plus Medical Management18.8Standard Error 2.44percentage heavy drinking days

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management105
Overall StudySTARTEDSugar Pill Plus Medical Management113
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management90
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSugar Pill Plus Medical Management92
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management15
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSugar Pill Plus Medical Management21

Adverse events74

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management1510520
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersSugar Pill Plus Medical Management51136
otherDry MouthGastrointestinal disordersQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management3410536
otherDry MouthGastrointestinal disordersSugar Pill Plus Medical Management1011311
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management1410522
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersSugar Pill Plus Medical Management21132
otherIncreased AppetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management1210512
otherIncreased AppetiteMetabolism and nutrition disordersSugar Pill Plus Medical Management11131
otherSedationNervous system disordersQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management1610518
otherSedationNervous system disordersSugar Pill Plus Medical Management31133

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management
Total, all-cause mortalitySugar Pill Plus Medical Management
Total, other adverse eventsQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management105105
Total, other adverse eventsSugar Pill Plus Medical Management110113
Total, serious adverse eventsQuetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management6105
Total, serious adverse eventsSugar Pill Plus Medical Management5113

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
21950727RESULTPubMed
32963470DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Quetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management vs Sugar Pill Plus Medical Management: Percent Subjects With no Heavy Drinking DayTrial comparisons
Quetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management vs Sugar Pill Plus Medical Management: Percent Subjects AbstinentTrial comparisons
Quetiapine Fumerate Plus Medical Management vs Sugar Pill Plus Medical Management: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00498628

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00498628/results?page=2