ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00520130

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)6 months
Acute GVHD is assessed by the 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading criteria. See Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995; 15:825-8., for grading criteria.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD)2 years post transplant
Chronic GVHD is assessed by the 2005 Chronic GVHD Consensus Project. First the individual organ scoring is done, and then based on that the Global score is determined (mild-moderate-severe). See Citation: Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005; 11:945-56., for grading criteria.
PrimaryRecovery of Naïve Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) T CellsRecipient recovery at 6, 12 and 24 months post transplantThe percentage of C-C motif chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7)+CD45RA+ naïve T cells within the CD4 T cell populations was determined by flow cytometry.
PrimaryRecovery of Naïve Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T CellsRecipient recovery at 6, 12 and 24 months post transplantThe percentage of CCR7+CD45RA+ naïve T cells within the CD4 and CD8 T cell populations was determined by flow cytometry.
PrimaryChanges in Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) T Cell Receptor Vbeta RepertoireDonor at time of collection and recipient at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post transplant
Ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted from sorted CD4 and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) T cells and analyzed for Vbeta repertoire by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis using Vbeta family specific primers and a labeled constant region primer (spectratyping). The receptor repertoire diversity was calculated from spectratyping data by creating a normal standard for repertoire diversity from healthy normal controls and assessing the divergence of individual patient's T cell receptor repertoire from these standard normal donor values. In this Vbeta repertoire divergence index, lower numbers are consistent with a more normal highly diverse repertoire, and high numbers represent a highly skewed, oligoclonal repertoire. The assay is described in Memon SA et al, J Immunol Methods, 2012, 375: 84-92. The repertoire diversity of the CD4 and CD8 T cells of the donor infusion is shown for comparison.
PrimaryChanges in CD8 T Cell Receptor Vbeta RepertoireDonor at time of collection and recipient at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post transplant
Ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted from sorted CD4 and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) T cells and analyzed for Vbeta repertoire by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis using Vbeta family specific primers and a labeled constant region primer (spectratyping). The receptor repertoire diversity was calculated from spectratyping data by creating a normal standard for repertoire diversity from healthy normal controls and assessing the divergence of individual patient's T cell receptor repertoire from these standard normal donor values. In this Vbeta repertoire divergence index, lower numbers are consistent with a more normal highly diverse repertoire, and high numbers represent a highly skewed, oligoclonal repertoire. The assay is described in Memon SA et al, J Immunol Methods, 2012, 375: 84-92. The repertoire diversity of the CD4 and CD8 T cells of the donor infusion is shown for comparison.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Grade III-IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)6 months
Acute GVHD is assessed by the 1994 Consensus Conference on acute GVHD Grading criteria. See Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995; 15:825-8., for grading criteria.
SecondaryToxicities103 months and 22 daysHere are the number of participants with adverse events. For a detailed list of adverse events, see the adverse event module.
SecondaryDays to Engraftment of Neutrophils2 yearsDays to engraftment is defined as neutrophil recovery: designated by the first of 3 consecutive days with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) above 500/mm(3).
SecondaryDays to Engraftment of Platelets2 yearsPlatelet recovery: designated by the first of 7 days where the platelet count remains above 20,000/mm(3) without transfusion support
SecondaryDays to Engraftment of Lymphocytes2 yearsLymphocyte recovery: designated by the first of 3 consecutive days with absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) above 500/mm(3).
SecondaryOverall SurvivalPatients were followed for an average of up to 5 years.Time between the first day of transplant to the day of death.
SecondaryEarly Treatment Related MortalityLess than or equal to 28 days after transplantationAny death occurring within 28 days after transplantation in a patient in continuous remission.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Late Treatment Related MortalityGreater than 28 days after transplantationAny death occurring 28 days or more after transplantation in a patient in continuous remission.
SecondaryDecline in Homeostatic Cytokine Interleukin 7 (IL-7) Post-TransplantDay 0, 1 week and 2 weeks
During depletion of lymphocytes during transplant conditioning, levels of homeostatic cytokines increase in the blood. These then decline with the expansion of new donor-derived cells. The rapidity of decline may predict acute graft versus host disease (AGVHD). Decline in cytokine IL-7 will be assessed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
SecondaryImmune Reconstitution of Normal Killer (NK) Cells2 weeks, and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post transplant
Cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) - cluster of differentiation 56 (CD56) + Natural Killer (NK) cells within the lymphocyte population were determined by flow cytometry. The absolute numbers of cells/µl were calculated from the absolute lymphocyte count.
SecondaryImmune Reconstitution of Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) T Cell Populations2 weeks, and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post transplant
Cluster of Differentiation 3 (CD3)+CD4+ and CD3+Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8)+ T cells within the lymphocyte population were determined by flow cytometry. The absolute numbers of cells/µl were calculated from the absolute lymphocyte count.
SecondaryImmune Reconstitution of Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T Cell Populations2 weeks, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post transplant
Cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3)+cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4)+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells within the lymphocyte population were determined by flow cytometry. The absolute numbers of cells/µl were calculated from the absolute lymphocyte count.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00520130/registered