ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00530803

The Efficacy of EMLA Cream vs. Synera Patch for Pain Reduction During Venipuncture in Children

NCT00530803, Phase 2, Completed, Montefiore Medical Center; results first posted 2018-08-31

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. The Efficacy of EMLA Cream vs. Synera Patch for Pain Reduction During Venipuncture in Children. Trials, record NCT00530803. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00530803

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
The Efficacy of EMLA Cream vs. Synera Patch for Pain Reduction During Venipuncture in Children
NCT number
NCT00530803
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
100 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Montefiore Medical Center
Conditions
Pain, Needle Phobia
Interventions
EMLA Cream, Synera Patch
First posted
2007-09-17
Last updated
2018-08-31
Results first posted
2018-08-31

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryParticipants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.immediately after completion of venipuncture
Participants were asked to report their level of pain using a 6-point Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale ranging from 0, "no pain," to 5, "the most pain you can have." The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale is a validated tool for measuring pain in patients as young as 3 years old. A FACES pain score less than or equal to 2 is considered no pain to mild pain, and is clinically acceptable. Studies have shown average FACES pain scores for children receiving vascular access with placebo to be 2.2 to 3.5.
SecondaryParent Rating of Child's Pain Using a 6-point NRSimmediately after venipuncture is completed
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Parents reported their own subjective evaluation of participants pain level. Each participant had only one parental assessment. Total number of parental assessment for each pain level on the 6-point NRS is reported as total number of participants experiencing that pain level.
SecondaryBlinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of Participants' Pain Level at Tourniquet Placement, Using a 6-point NRSbefore venipuncture
The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Blinded observers reported their own subjective evaluation of the level of pain experienced by the participants at tourniquet placement. Total number of participants subjectively evaluated as experiencing each pain level is reported.
SecondaryBlinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of the Participant's Pain Level at Needle Insertion, Using a 6-point NRSduring needle insertion
The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Blinded observers reported their own subjective evaluation of the level of pain experienced by the participants at needle insertion. Total number of participants subjectively evaluated as experiencing each pain level is reported.
SecondaryBlinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of the Participant's Pain Level at 5 Minutes Post Venipuncture Procedure, Using a 6-point NRS5 minutes post venipuncture
The NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) is a 6-point rating scale where 0= no pain and 5 = worst pain. Blinded observers reported their own subjective evaluation of the level of pain participants were experiencing 5 minutes after the venipuncture was completed. Total number of participants subjectively evaluated as experiencing each pain level is reported.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYParticipants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.immediately after completion of venipunctureParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYParent Rating of Child's Pain Using a 6-point NRSimmediately after venipuncture is completedNumber of parent assessment for each pain level on the 6-point NRS. Each participant had only one parental assessment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYBlinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of Participants' Pain Level at Tourniquet Placement, Using a 6-point NRSbefore venipunctureParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYBlinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of the Participant's Pain Level at Needle Insertion, Using a 6-point NRSduring needle insertionParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYBlinded Observer's Subjective Ratings of the Participant's Pain Level at 5 Minutes Post Venipuncture Procedure, Using a 6-point NRS5 minutes post venipunctureParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group60

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.EMLA CreamParticipants with FACES Score = 0 (No pain)42Participants
Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.Synera PatchParticipants with FACES Score = 0 (No pain)38Participants
Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.EMLA CreamParticipants with FACES Score = 16Participants
Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.Synera PatchParticipants with FACES Score = 18Participants
Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.EMLA CreamParticipants with FACES Score = 22Participants
Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.Synera PatchParticipants with FACES Score = 23Participants
Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.EMLA CreamParticipants with FACES Score = 30Participants
Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.Synera PatchParticipants with FACES Score = 31Participants
Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.EMLA CreamParticipants with FACES Score = 40Participants
Participants Self-rating of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.Synera PatchParticipants with FACES Score = 40Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEMLA Cream50
Overall StudySTARTEDSynera Patch50
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEMLA Cream50
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSynera Patch50
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEMLA Cream0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSynera Patch0

Adverse events8

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersEMLA Cream650
otherErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersSynera Patch750
otherPruitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersEMLA Cream150
otherPruitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersSynera Patch050
otherpallorSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersEMLA Cream2050
otherpallorSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersSynera Patch350
otherEdemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersEMLA Cream050
otherEdemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersSynera Patch050

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEMLA Cream050
Total, all-cause mortalitySynera Patch050
Total, other adverse eventsEMLA Cream2750
Total, other adverse eventsSynera Patch1050
Total, serious adverse eventsEMLA Cream050
Total, serious adverse eventsSynera Patch050

Papers14

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
1614786BACKGROUNDPubMed
2234995BACKGROUNDPubMed
2748256BACKGROUNDPubMed
2812853BACKGROUNDPubMed
3344163BACKGROUNDPubMed
7547043BACKGROUNDPubMed
8165081BACKGROUNDPubMed
9251995BACKGROUNDPubMed
10469814BACKGROUNDPubMed
11016557BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 14

See all 14 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
EMLA Cream vs Synera Patch: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
EMLA Cream vs Synera Patch: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00530803

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00530803/results?page=2