ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00538304

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Bimatoprost in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

NCT00538304, Phase 2, Completed, Allergan; results first posted 2011-10-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Bimatoprost in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. Trials, record NCT00538304. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00538304

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Bimatoprost in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
NCT number
NCT00538304
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
222 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Conditions
Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Interventions
bimatoprost eye drops, placebo
First posted
2007-10-02
Last updated
2019-04-23
Results first posted
2011-10-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Mean Peak Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia at Month 1Baseline, Month 1
Change from Baseline in macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia (or visible eye redness). Macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia is graded by the investigator who compares the patient's visual appearance of eye redness to standard photographs using a 5-point scale (Scale 0 to +3: none, trace, mild, moderate, severe). The peak change is calculated for each eye by subtracting the largest score across the hourly measurements at baseline from the largest score across the hourly measurements at month 1. A positive number severity grade change from baseline indicated an increase in redness.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With an Increase in Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia in Either Eye at Month 1Month 1
Percentage of patients with a \>= 1 unit increase in macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia in either eye at the Month 1, 8 AM time point. Macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia is graded by the investigator who compares the patient's visual appearance of eye redness to standard photographs using a 5-point scale (Scale 0 to +3: none, trace, mild, moderate, severe).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 1Baseline, Month 1
Change from baseline in mean (average) IOP at Month 1 8 AM timepoint. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. For each eye, the IOP was either the average of the 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the median of the 3 measurements. A negative number change from Baseline indicated a reduction in IOP.
SecondaryPercentage of Physicians Who Were Very or Extremely Willing to Continue Patient on Drug, if Drug Were Marketed at Month 1Month 1
Percentage of physicians who were very or extremely willing to continue patient on drug if drug were marketed based on their reported response to the question. Physicians were asked "Overall, based on how well this drug lowered THIS patient's IOP, balanced with any adverse events she/he may have experienced, would you consider continuing THIS medication (if the drug was marketed)?". The responses were extremely willing, very willing, somewhat willing and not willing. If not willing, physician was asked for reason.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Were Very or Extremely Willing to Use This Glaucoma Medication at Month 1Month 1
Percentage of patients who were very or extremely willing to continue to use this glaucoma medication based on their reported response to the question. Patients were asked "Overall, based on how well this drug lowered your IOP, your concern about the preservation of your vision, balanced with any side effects you may have experienced using your medication, would you be willing to continue this medication (eye drops) if your physician prescribed it?". The responses were extremely willing, very willing, somewhat willing and not willing. If not willing, patient was asked for reason.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Who Reported No Change in the Appearance of Their Eyes Since the Beginning of the Study at Month 1Month 1
Percentage of patients who reported no change in the appearance of their eyes since the beginning of the study. Patients were asked "Are you experiencing a change in how your eye looks now since you began your current glaucoma medication?". The responses were yes or no. If yes, patient was asked for primary reason and if better, worse or as expected based on what the doctor's office told them to expect.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Mean Peak Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia at Month 1Baseline, Month 1
Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who were enrolled in the study, received at least 1 dose of study medication and were evaluated for macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and the month 1 visits.
Number on a scale (score)MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With an Increase in Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia in Either Eye at Month 1Month 1
Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who were enrolled in the study, received at least 1 dose of study medication and were evaluated for macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and the month 1 visits.
Percentage of PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 1Baseline, Month 1
Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who were enrolled in the study, received at least 1 dose of study medication and were evaluated for macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and the month 1 visits.
millimeters of mercury (mmHg)MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Physicians Who Were Very or Extremely Willing to Continue Patient on Drug, if Drug Were Marketed at Month 1Month 1
Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who were enrolled in the study, received at least 1 dose of study medication and were evaluated for macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and the month 1 visits.
Percentage of PhysiciansNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Who Were Very or Extremely Willing to Use This Glaucoma Medication at Month 1Month 1
Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who were enrolled in the study, received at least 1 dose of study medication and were evaluated for macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and the month 1 visits.
Percentage of PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Who Reported No Change in the Appearance of Their Eyes Since the Beginning of the Study at Month 1Month 1
Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who were enrolled in the study, received at least 1 dose of study medication and were evaluated for macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and the month 1 visits.
Percentage of PatientsNUMBER

Results by group16

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Mean Peak Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia at Month 1Bimatoprost Eye DropsBaseline0.32Standard Deviation 0.280Number on a scale (score)
Change From Baseline in Mean Peak Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia at Month 1PlaceboBaseline0.30Standard Deviation 0.288Number on a scale (score)
Change From Baseline in Mean Peak Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia at Month 1Bimatoprost Eye DropsMonth 10.18Standard Deviation 0.456Number on a scale (score)
Change From Baseline in Mean Peak Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia at Month 1PlaceboMonth 10.02Standard Deviation 0.321Number on a scale (score)
Percentage of Patients With an Increase in Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia in Either Eye at Month 1Bimatoprost Eye Drops8.16Percentage of Patients
Percentage of Patients With an Increase in Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia in Either Eye at Month 1Placebo1.41Percentage of Patients
Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 1Bimatoprost Eye DropsBaseline, 8AM18.2Standard Deviation 3.13millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 1PlaceboBaseline, 8AM18.0Standard Deviation 3.34millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 1Bimatoprost Eye DropsMonth 1, 8AM-1.0Standard Deviation 2.64millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 1PlaceboMonth 1, 8AM3.6Standard Deviation 3.85millimeters of mercury (mmHg)

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBimatoprost Eye Drops151
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo71
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBimatoprost Eye Drops144
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo66
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBimatoprost Eye Drops7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo5

Adverse events2

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherConjunctival hyperaemiaEye disordersBimatoprost Eye Drops10150
otherConjunctival hyperaemiaEye disordersPlacebo271

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBimatoprost Eye Drops
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsBimatoprost Eye Drops10150
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo271
Total, serious adverse eventsBimatoprost Eye Drops0150
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo071

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
21188155BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Bimatoprost Eye Drops vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00538304

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00538304/registered