ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00545779

BONCURE Study: A Study of Monthly Bonviva (Ibandronate) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis on Bisphosphonate Therapy.

NCT00545779, Phase 3, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2016-10-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. BONCURE Study: A Study of Monthly Bonviva (Ibandronate) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis on Bisphosphonate Therapy. Trials, record NCT00545779. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00545779

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
BONCURE Study: A Study of Monthly Bonviva (Ibandronate) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis on Bisphosphonate Therapy.
NCT number
NCT00545779
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
677 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis
Interventions
Ibandronate
First posted
2007-10-17
Last updated
2016-10-28
Results first posted
2016-10-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users in Part A Who Answer 'Yes' to Any of the Questions in the Candidate Identification Questionnaire (CIQ)Visit 0 (less than or equal to [<=] Day -30)
The CIQ was completed in Part A by all the participants. The information from the CIQ was used to determine the percentage of current daily or weekly bisphosphonate users for whom monthly ibandronate represented a potentially more satisfactory therapeutic option. In the CIQ participants were asked to answer either 'yes' or 'no' to the following 3 questions: 1. I would prefer a monthly oral dosing schedule to my current (daily or weekly) dosing schedule. 2. More than once per month, I have experienced stomach upset within 48 hours of taking my osteoporosis medication. 3. Over the past 3 months, I have missed taking 3 or more doses of my current (daily or weekly) osteoporosis medication.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Reported Preference for Monthly IbandronateVisit 0 (<= Day -30)Percentage of participants who reported preference for monthly ibandronate were reported.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Positive Change in Total Composite Satisfaction Score (CSS) at Month 6 in Part B by CIQ Fracture (Fr) GroupMonth 6
Participants with a positive change from their baseline CSS at Month 6 are considered those participants who are satisfied with once-monthly dosing of ibandronate after 6 months of use were reported. The CSS is scaled from 0 to 100 and is an average of the 4 domain scores of the Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q): Convenience (questions 1 to 6), Quality of Life (questions 7 and 8), Overall Satisfaction (questions 9 and 10) and Side Effects (questions 11 to 16). Higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Eligible Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users at Screening Who Elect to Enter Part B by CIQVisit 0 (<= Day -30)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Reported an Improved Satisfaction Score After 6 Months in Part BMonth 6
Percentage of participants who report an improved satisfaction score after 6 months of monthly ibandronate therapy as compared to daily or weekly alendronate or risendronate at baseline based on responses to each individual question in the CIQ were reported. In the CIQ participants were asked to answer either 'yes' or 'no' to the following 3 questions: 1. I would prefer a monthly oral dosing schedule to my current (daily or weekly) dosing schedule 2. More than once per month, I have experienced stomach upset within 48 hours of taking my osteoporosis medication 3. Over the past 3 months, I have missed taking 3 or more doses of my current (daily or weekly) osteoporosis medication
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Have Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 80% Compliance With 6 Monthly Doses of Ibandronate in Part BUp to Month 6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Choose a Monthly Reminder to Take Ibandronate in Part BVisit 0 (<= Day -30)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Reported an Improvement in the Frequency of Gastro-intestinal (GI) Symptoms Per Month in Part BBaseline to Month 6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants by Age and Activity Level Reporting High Satisfaction According to the Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) in Part BMonth 6
SecondaryOsteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Domain Scores in Part BBaseline, Month 6
The OPSAT-Q is a validated questionnaire designed to capture satisfaction with bisphosphonate treatment. It comprises four domains: convenience (questions 1-6), quality of life (questions 7 and 8), overall satisfaction (questions 9 and 10), and side effects (questions 11-16). Each domain (scale) ranges 0-100 scale. All items were scored such that higher scores represented greater satisfaction or less bother. Treatment satisfaction was measured with the OPSAT-Q composite satisfaction score (OPSAT-Q CSS), which was the average of the scores from the four domains of the OPSAT-Q converted to a 0-100-point scale, in which higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users in Part A Who Answer 'Yes' to Any of the Questions in the Candidate Identification Questionnaire (CIQ)Visit 0 (less than or equal to [<=] Day -30)All enrolled participants who completed the part A of the study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Reported Preference for Monthly IbandronateVisit 0 (<= Day -30)All enrolled participants who completed the part A of the study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Positive Change in Total Composite Satisfaction Score (CSS) at Month 6 in Part B by CIQ Fracture (Fr) GroupMonth 6The intent-to treat (ITT) population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Number of participant analyzed are with or without previous history of Fr.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Eligible Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users at Screening Who Elect to Enter Part B by CIQVisit 0 (<= Day -30)The ITT population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Reported an Improved Satisfaction Score After 6 Months in Part BMonth 6The ITT population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Have Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 80% Compliance With 6 Monthly Doses of Ibandronate in Part BUp to Month 6The ITT population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Choose a Monthly Reminder to Take Ibandronate in Part BVisit 0 (<= Day -30)The ITT population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Reported an Improvement in the Frequency of Gastro-intestinal (GI) Symptoms Per Month in Part BBaseline to Month 6Analysis was not performed because the data were difficult or impossible to derive from the database.
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants by Age and Activity Level Reporting High Satisfaction According to the Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) in Part BMonth 6Analysis was not performed because the data were difficult or impossible to derive from the database.
SECONDARYOsteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Domain Scores in Part BBaseline, Month 6The ITT population included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users in Part A Who Answer 'Yes' to Any of the Questions in the Candidate Identification Questionnaire (CIQ)Ibandronate68.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Reported Preference for Monthly IbandronateIbandronate67.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Positive Change in Total Composite Satisfaction Score (CSS) at Month 6 in Part B by CIQ Fracture (Fr) GroupIbandronateParticipants answer Yes with previous Fr (n=115)86.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Positive Change in Total Composite Satisfaction Score (CSS) at Month 6 in Part B by CIQ Fracture (Fr) GroupIbandronateParticipants answer Yes without previous Fr(n=310)89.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Positive Change in Total Composite Satisfaction Score (CSS) at Month 6 in Part B by CIQ Fracture (Fr) GroupIbandronateParticipants answer NO with previous Fr (n=47)87.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Positive Change in Total Composite Satisfaction Score (CSS) at Month 6 in Part B by CIQ Fracture (Fr) GroupIbandronateParticipants answer NO without previous Fr (n=155)77.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Eligible Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users at Screening Who Elect to Enter Part B by CIQIbandronateAnswered Yes to at least 1 question in CIQ68.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Eligible Current Daily or Weekly Bisphosphonate Users at Screening Who Elect to Enter Part B by CIQIbandronateAnswered NO to every question in CIQ31.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Reported an Improved Satisfaction Score After 6 Months in Part BIbandronateCIQ Question 1 = Yes (n=422)88.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Reported an Improved Satisfaction Score After 6 Months in Part BIbandronateCIQ Question 1 = No (n=205)80.0percentage of participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDIbandronate677
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIbandronate633
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIbandronate44

Adverse events11

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersIbandronate12640
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersIbandronate7640
seriousPericarditisCardiac disordersIbandronate1640
seriousIridocyclitisEye disordersIbandronate1640
seriousAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersIbandronate1640
seriousHiatus herniaGastrointestinal disordersIbandronate1640
seriousPyrexiaGeneral disordersIbandronate1640
seriousPostoperative herniaInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsIbandronate1640
seriousBone painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersIbandronate1640
seriousRenal failure acuteRenal and urinary disordersIbandronate1640

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityIbandronate
Total, other adverse eventsIbandronate18640
Total, serious adverse eventsIbandronate6640

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00545779

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00545779/results?page=2