ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00547118

The Effects of Rimonabant, on Weight and Metabolic Risk Factors

NCT00547118, Phase 2, Terminated, University of Maryland, Baltimore; results first posted 2015-02-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. The Effects of Rimonabant, on Weight and Metabolic Risk Factors. Trials, record NCT00547118. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00547118

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
The Effects of Rimonabant, on Weight and Metabolic Risk Factors
NCT number
NCT00547118
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
17 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Conditions
Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Obesity, Hypertension, Smoking
Interventions
Rimonabant, Placebo
First posted
2007-10-22
Last updated
2019-11-04
Results first posted
2015-02-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryBrief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Total ScoreBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)
The total BPRS score is calculated by adding the scores for scales #1-#18. Each scale ranges from "1=Not Present" to "7=Very Severe". Total scores range from a minimum score of 18 to a maximum score of 126. A higher total score indicates a more severe psychiatric symptom rating.
PrimaryBrief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Psychosis ScoreBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)
The psychosis score is calculated by adding the scores for scales #4 Conceptual Disorganization, #11 Suspiciousness, #12 Hallucinatory Behavior, and #15 Unusual Thought Content. Each scale ranges from "1=Not Present" to "7=Very Severe". The minimum psychosis score is 4 and the maximum psychosis score is 28. A higher score indicates a more severe psychosis rating.
PrimaryThe Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)Baseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)
The RBANS is a brief, individually administered test designed to evaluate neuropsychological status of adults, ages 20-89. The 12 subtests measure attention, language, visuospatial/constructional abilities, and immediate and delayed memory. The raw scores from the subtests are scaled together to create index scores, and these are summed for conversion to a total scale score. Higher score equals a better outcome. The total index score range for the RBANS is 40-160.
PrimaryThe Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)Baseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)
The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is a computer-administered cognitive test that assesses risk preferences by simulating real-life decision making using uncertainty, rewards, and penalties. In the task, players are given four decks of cards and an endowment of fake money (e.g., $2000). Players are instructed to select cards one at a time and try to lose the least amount of money and win the most. The outcome measure was the number of rewarded minus punished card choices. Task has a maximum of 100 trials. The net score is the difference between the number of choices from advantageous decks verses disadvantageous decks. Higher scores are better and can range from -50 to +50.
PrimaryN-Back Neurocognitive Task: 0-back ConditionBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)
The N-Back task is a sequential letter working memory task. D-prime was used to measure accuracy on the 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back conditions. D-prime scores range from 0 to 8.6. Higher scores are better. As memory load increases from 0 to 1, from 1 to 2, D-prime scores are expected to be lower.
PrimaryN-Back Neurocognitive Task: 1-back ConditionBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)
The N-Back task is a sequential letter working memory task. D-prime was used to measure accuracy on the 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back conditions. D-prime scores range from 0 to 8.6. Higher scores are better. As memory load increases from 0 to 1, from 1 to 2, D-prime scores are expected to be lower.
PrimaryN-Back Neurocognitive Task: 2-back ConditionBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)
The N-Back task is a sequential letter working memory task. D-prime was used to measure accuracy on the 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back conditions. D-prime scores range from 0 to 8.6. Higher scores are better. As memory load increases from 0 to 1, from 1 to 2, D-prime scores are expected to be lower.
SecondarySchedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total ScoreBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)SANS total score range = 0-85. Higher scores indicate more severe negative symptoms.
SecondarySchedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) - AnhedoniaBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)SANS Global Anhedonia score. Scores can range from 0-5, with higher scores indicating more severe anhedonia.
SecondarySchedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) - Blunted AffectBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)SANS Global Rating of Affective Flattening. Scores can range from 0-5, with higher scores indicating more severe blunted affect.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYBrief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Total ScoreBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)Because of early study termination, 2 participants on rimonabant and 3 on placebo were withdrawn before completion.units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYBrief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Psychosis ScoreBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)Because of early study termination, 2 participants on rimonabant and 3 on placebo were withdrawn before completion.units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYThe Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)Baseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)
14 (R n=7, P n=7) completed baseline and End Of Study (EOS), 16 wk. Neurocognitive assessments (i.e. RBANS); 1 P pt. failed to complete the other EOS neurocognitive tests. 5 R pts. and 4 P pts. completed the 16-wk. treatment phase; the other 2 R pts. completed 11 and 13 wks. and 3 P pts. completed 13 (n=2) and 15 wks. (n=1).
units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYThe Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)Baseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)
14 (R n=7, P n=7) completed baseline and End Of Study (EOS), 16 wk. Neurocognitive assessments (i.e. RBANS); 1 P pt. failed to complete the other EOS neurocognitive tests. 5 R pts. and 4 P pts. completed the 16-wk. treatment phase; the other 2 R pts. completed 11 and 13 wks. and 3 P pts. completed 13 (n=2) and 15 wks. (n=1).
units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYN-Back Neurocognitive Task: 0-back ConditionBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)
14 (R n=7, P n=7) completed baseline and End Of Study (EOS), 16 wk. Neurocognitive assessments (i.e. RBANS); 1 P pt. failed to complete the other EOS neurocognitive tests. 5 R pts. and 4 P pts. completed the 16-wk. treatment phase; the other 2 R pts. completed 11 and 13 wks. and 3 P pts. completed 13 (n=2) and 15 wks. (n=1).
units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYN-Back Neurocognitive Task: 1-back ConditionBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)
14 (R n=7, P n=7) completed baseline and End Of Study (EOS), 16 wk. Neurocognitive assessments (i.e. RBANS); 1 P pt. failed to complete the other EOS neurocognitive tests. 5 R pts. and 4 P pts. completed the 16-wk. treatment phase; the other 2 R pts. completed 11 and 13 wks. and 3 P pts. completed 13 (n=2) and 15 wks. (n=1).
units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYN-Back Neurocognitive Task: 2-back ConditionBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)
14 (R n=7, P n=7) completed baseline and End Of Study (EOS), 16 wk. Neurocognitive assessments (i.e. RBANS); 1 P pt. failed to complete the other EOS neurocognitive tests. 5 R pts. and 4 P pts. completed the 16-wk. treatment phase; the other 2 R pts. completed 11 and 13 wks. and 3 P pts. completed 13 (n=2) and 15 wks. (n=1).
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSchedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total ScoreBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)Because of early study termination, 2 participants on rimonabant and 3 on placebo were withdrawn before completion.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSchedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) - AnhedoniaBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)Because of early study termination, 2 participants on rimonabant and 3 on placebo were withdrawn before completion.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSchedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) - Blunted AffectBaseline (Week 0) and end of study (Week 16)Because of early study termination, 2 participants on rimonabant and 3 on placebo were withdrawn before completion.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group56

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Total ScoreRimonabantWeek 033.5Standard Deviation 7.5units on a scale
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Total ScorePlaceboWeek 034.5Standard Deviation 4.6units on a scale
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Total ScoreRimonabantWeek 1632.8Standard Deviation 3.9units on a scale
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Total ScorePlaceboWeek 1633.6Standard Deviation 6.2units on a scale
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Psychosis ScoreRimonabantWeek 09.4Standard Deviation 4.3units on a scale
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Psychosis ScorePlaceboWeek 011.4Standard Deviation 3.4units on a scale
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Psychosis ScoreRimonabantWeek 167.6Standard Deviation 3.0units on a scale
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Psychosis ScorePlaceboWeek 168.6Standard Deviation 3.4units on a scale
The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)RimonabantWeek 085.0Standard Deviation 19.8units on a scale
The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)PlaceboWeek 078.3Standard Deviation 10.2units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRimonabant8
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo9
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRimonabant0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRimonabant8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo9

Adverse events26

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheGeneral disordersRimonabant38
otherHeadacheGeneral disordersPlacebo59
otherEnuresisRenal and urinary disordersRimonabant38
otherEnuresisRenal and urinary disordersPlacebo49
otherAnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersRimonabant38
otherAnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersPlacebo39
otherSedationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersRimonabant28
otherSedationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPlacebo49
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersRimonabant38
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo49

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRimonabant
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsRimonabant48
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo69
Total, serious adverse eventsRimonabant08
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo09

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Rimonabant vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests3

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
1-Back TaskPrimary outcomeConductCognition
2-Back TaskPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Iowa Gambling LitePrimary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00547118

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00547118/results?page=2