ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00556374

Study to Determine Treatment Effects of Denosumab in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy

NCT00556374, Phase 3, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2015-11-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Determine Treatment Effects of Denosumab in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy. Trials, record NCT00556374. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00556374

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Determine Treatment Effects of Denosumab in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
NCT number
NCT00556374
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
3,420 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Placebo, Denosumab, Non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy, Zoledronic Acid, Standard of Care
First posted
2007-11-12
Last updated
2023-07-27
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2005-005275-15
Results first posted
2015-11-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTime to First Clinical FractureFrom randomization until the primary analysis cut-off date of 26 March 2014; maximum time on main study at the cut-off was 87 months
The time to first on-study clinical fracture was defined as the number of days from randomization to the date of the x-ray confirming the clinical fracture. A clinical fracture is any clinically evident fracture with associated symptoms and confirmed by x-ray. Participants who died or withdrew without experiencing a clinical fracture were censored at the date of last contact or study termination whichever was earlier.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Total Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 36 at Pre-selected SitesBaseline and Month 36Bone mineral density was assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 36 at Pre-selected SitesBaseline and Month 36Bone mineral density was assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 36 at Pre-selected SitesBaseline and Month 36Bone mineral density was assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures36 months
Assessment of vertebral fractures was performed by an expert radiologist at the central imaging center using a semiquantitative grading scale: Grade 1, 20% to 25% reduction in vertebral height (anterior, middle, or posterior); Grade 2, 25% to 40% reduction in height; Grade 3, greater than 40% reduction in height. A new vertebral fracture was defined as a fracture in a previously undeformed vertebrae including new compression fractures, defined as those compression fractures having a decrease in total anterior or posterior height of at least 25% from baseline. New vertebral fractures includes morphometric vertebral fractures identified from on study x-rays and clinical vertebral fractures confirmed by x-rays.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With New or Worsening Vertebral Fractures36 months
Assessment of vertebral fractures was performed by an expert radiologist at the central imaging center using a semiquantitative grading scale: Grade 1, 20% to 25% reduction in vertebral height (anterior, middle, or posterior); Grade 2, 25% to 40% reduction in height; Grade 3, greater than 40% reduction in height. A new vertebral fracture was defined as a fracture in a previously undeformed vertebrae including new compression fractures, defined as those compression fractures having a decrease in total anterior or posterior height of at least 25% from baseline. New vertebral fractures includes morphometric vertebral fractures identified from on study x-rays and clinical vertebral fractures confirmed by x-rays. Worsening of pre-existing fractures was defined as an increase in fracture severity of at least 1 grade on the semiquantitative scale.
SecondaryDisease-free Survival (DFS)From randomization until the DFS data cut-off date of 15 September 2015; maximum time on main study at the cut-off was 102 months
DFS was defined as the time interval from the randomization date to the date of first evidence of local or distant metastases, contra-lateral breast cancer, secondary carcinoma, or death from any cause (whichever occurred first). Participants last known to be alive, who did not experience recurrence of disease, were censored at their last contact date or at the data cut-off date whichever came first.
SecondaryBone Metastases-free Survival (BMFS)From randomization until end of main study, maximum time on main study was 152 months
BMFS was defined as the time interval from randomization to first occurrence of bone metastasis or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Participants last known to be alive, who did not experience bone metastasis, were censored at their last assessment (i.e., bone scan) date or at the last contact date, whichever comes first.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)Randomization until end of main study, maximum duration of main study was 152 monthsOS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYTime to First Clinical FractureFrom randomization until the primary analysis cut-off date of 26 March 2014; maximum time on main study at the cut-off was 87 monthsFull Analysis Set: all randomized participantsDaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Total Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 36 at Pre-selected SitesBaseline and Month 36BMD Analysis Set: all participants with evaluable lumbar spine BMD values at Baseline and Month 36Percent Change in BMDLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 36 at Pre-selected SitesBaseline and Month 36BMD Analysis Set: all participants with total hip BMD evaluable values at Baseline and Month 36Percent Change in BMDLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 36 at Pre-selected SitesBaseline and Month 36BMD Analysis Set: all participants with evaluable femoral neck BMD values at Baseline and Month 36Percent Change in BMDLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures36 monthsVertebral Fracture Analysis Set: all participants with a Baseline and at least one post-baseline vertebral x-ray prior to or at Month 36ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With New or Worsening Vertebral Fractures36 monthsVertebral Fracture Analysis Set: all participants with a Baseline and at least one post-baseline vertebral x-ray prior to or at Month 36ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYDisease-free Survival (DFS)From randomization until the DFS data cut-off date of 15 September 2015; maximum time on main study at the cut-off was 102 monthsFull Analysis Set: all randomized participantsDaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYBone Metastases-free Survival (BMFS)From randomization until end of main study, maximum time on main study was 152 monthsFull Analysis Set: all randomized participantsDaysMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)Randomization until end of main study, maximum duration of main study was 152 monthsFull analysis set: all randomized participantsDaysMEDIAN

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Time to First Clinical FracturePlaceboNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NADays
Time to First Clinical FractureDenosumabNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NADays
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 36 at Pre-selected SitesPlacebo-2.7595% Confidence Interval -3.44 to -2.07Percent Change in BMD
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 36 at Pre-selected SitesDenosumab7.2795% Confidence Interval 6.56 to 7.98Percent Change in BMD
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 36 at Pre-selected SitesPlacebo-3.3295% Confidence Interval -4.06 to -2.58Percent Change in BMD
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 36 at Pre-selected SitesDenosumab4.6095% Confidence Interval 3.85 to 5.35Percent Change in BMD
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 36 at Pre-selected SitesPlacebo-3.1095% Confidence Interval -3.72 to -2.48Percent Change in BMD
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 36 at Pre-selected SitesDenosumab3.4195% Confidence Interval 2.78 to 4.04Percent Change in BMD
Number of Participants With New Vertebral FracturesPlacebo49Participants
Number of Participants With New Vertebral FracturesDenosumab27Participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo1,709
Overall StudySTARTEDDenosumab1,711
Overall StudyReceived Study Drug in the Double-blind PhasePlacebo1,699
Overall StudyReceived Study Drug in the Double-blind PhaseDenosumab1,700
Overall StudyContinued Into the Open-Label PhasePlacebo268
Overall StudyContinued Into the Open-Label PhaseDenosumab3
Overall StudySafety Analysis SetPlacebo1,690
Overall StudySafety Analysis SetDenosumab1,709
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo1,242
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDenosumab1,362

Adverse events2,512

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersDouble-blind Phase: Placebo4461,690
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersDouble-blind Phase: Denosumab4411,709
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersOpen-label Phase: Placebo/Denosumab0245
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersOpen-label Phase: Denosumab/Denosumab01
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersDouble-blind Phase: Placebo1461,690
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersDouble-blind Phase: Denosumab1511,709
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersOpen-label Phase: Placebo/Denosumab0245
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersOpen-label Phase: Denosumab/Denosumab01
otherBone painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersDouble-blind Phase: Placebo1111,690
otherBone painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersDouble-blind Phase: Denosumab1391,709

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-blind Phase: Placebo
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-blind Phase: Denosumab
Total, all-cause mortalityOpen-label Phase: Placebo/Denosumab
Total, all-cause mortalityOpen-label Phase: Denosumab/Denosumab
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-blind Phase: Placebo8381,690
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-blind Phase: Denosumab8821,709
Total, other adverse eventsOpen-label Phase: Placebo/Denosumab0245
Total, other adverse eventsOpen-label Phase: Denosumab/Denosumab01
Total, serious adverse eventsDouble-blind Phase: Placebo5151,690
Total, serious adverse eventsDouble-blind Phase: Denosumab5211,709

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
26040499BACKGROUNDPubMed
30795951DERIVEDPubMed
35334418DERIVEDPubMed
38319865DERIVEDPubMed
38979716DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Denosumab vs Placebo: Number of Participants With New or Worsening Vertebral FracturesTrial comparisons
Denosumab vs Placebo: Number of Participants With New Vertebral FracturesTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00556374

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00556374/events?page=2