ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00556478

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of PSD502 (a Topical Anesthetic) in the Treatment Premature Ejaculation

NCT00556478, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, Plethora Solutions Ltd; results first posted 2016-09-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of PSD502 (a Topical Anesthetic) in the Treatment Premature Ejaculation. Trials, record NCT00556478. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00556478

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of PSD502 (a Topical Anesthetic) in the Treatment Premature Ejaculation
NCT number
NCT00556478
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
256 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Plethora Solutions Ltd
Conditions
Premature Ejaculation
Interventions
PSD502, contains a mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine, Placebo
First posted
2007-11-12
Last updated
2016-09-26
Results first posted
2016-09-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT): Change From Baseline to During 3 Month Double Blind-treatmentBaseline to 3 Months
To evaluate efficacy of treatment with PSD502 compared with placebo in subjects with PE as measured by: • change in mean IELT from baseline to during the 3 month double-blind treatment Results provide are ratio (over the 3 months/baseline).
PrimaryIndex of Premature Ejaculation (IPE): Change From Baseline to End of Month 3Baseline to 3 Months
To Evaluate Efficacy of Treatment With PSD502 Compared With Placebo in Subjects With PE as measured by: • changes in all 3 IPE domains from baseline to month 3 Ejaculatory control scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater ejaculatory control Sexual satisfaction scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater sexual satisfaction Distress scores range from 2 to 10 with a higher score indicating less distress
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) > 1 Minute and >2 Minutes During the 3 Months of Double-blind Treatment3 monthsPercentage of subjects with mean IELT \> 1 minute and \>2 minutes during the 3 months of double-blind treatment as measured by the proportion of subjects
SecondaryChange in Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) From Baseline to Month 33 monthsSummary of mean IELT at Baseline and at month 3 during double-blind treatment
SecondaryChange in the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE) Domains of Ejaculatory Control, Distress and Sexual Satisfaction From Baseline to Month 11 month
Change in the IPE domains of ejaculatory control, distress and sexual satisfaction from Baseline to month 1. Ejaculatory control scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater ejaculatory control Sexual satisfaction scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater sexual satisfaction Distress scores range from 2 to 10 with a higher score indicating less distress
SecondarySubject PEP at Month 11 month
Scores for perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation based on the subject PEP at month 1. Percentage of subjects with at least a 1 point category improvement in subject PEP domain scores at month 1.
SecondaryChange in the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE) Domains of Ejaculatory Control, Distress and Sexual Satisfaction From Baseline to Month 22 months
Change in the IPE domains of ejaculatory control, distress and sexual satisfaction from Baseline to month 2 Ejaculatory control scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater ejaculatory control Sexual satisfaction scores range from 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater sexual satisfaction Distress scores range from 2 to 10 with a higher score indicating less distress
SecondarySubject Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 22 months
Scores for perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation based on the subject PEP at month 2. Proportion of subjects with at least a 1 point category improvement in subject PEP domain scores from baseline to month 2.
SecondarySubject Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 33 months
Scores for perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation based on the subject PEP at month 3. Proportion of subjects with at least a 1 point category improvement in subject PEP domain scores from baseline to month 3.
SecondaryPartner Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 33 months
Scores for perceived control over ejaculation, personal distress related to ejaculation, satisfaction with sexual intercourse and interpersonal difficulty related to ejaculation based on the partner PEP at month 3. Proportion of partners with at least a 1 point category improvement in partner PEP domain scores from baseline to month 3.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT): Change From Baseline to During 3 Month Double Blind-treatmentBaseline to 3 MonthsITTratioGEOMETRIC_MEAN
PRIMARYIndex of Premature Ejaculation (IPE): Change From Baseline to End of Month 3Baseline to 3 MonthsITTScoreMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) > 1 Minute and >2 Minutes During the 3 Months of Double-blind Treatment3 monthsITTpercentage of subjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) From Baseline to Month 33 monthsITTSecondsGEOMETRIC_MEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE) Domains of Ejaculatory Control, Distress and Sexual Satisfaction From Baseline to Month 11 monthITTScoreMEAN
SECONDARYSubject PEP at Month 11 monthITTpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in the Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE) Domains of Ejaculatory Control, Distress and Sexual Satisfaction From Baseline to Month 22 monthsITTScoreMEAN
SECONDARYSubject Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 22 monthsITTpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSubject Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 33 monthsITTpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPartner Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at Month 33 monthsITTpercentage of partnersNUMBER

Results by group58

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT): Change From Baseline to During 3 Month Double Blind-treatmentDouble-Blind Active / Open-Label Active4.607Full Range 0.01 to 559.78ratio
Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT): Change From Baseline to During 3 Month Double Blind-treatmentDouble-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active1.505Full Range 0.27 to 12.58ratio
Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE): Change From Baseline to End of Month 3Double-Blind Active / Open-Label ActiveEjaculatory control7.2Full Range -3 to 16Score
Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE): Change From Baseline to End of Month 3Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label ActiveEjaculatory control2.2Full Range -1 to 14Score
Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE): Change From Baseline to End of Month 3Double-Blind Active / Open-Label ActiveSexual satisfaction6.6Full Range -8 to 16Score
Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE): Change From Baseline to End of Month 3Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label ActiveSexual satisfaction2.1Full Range -4 to 14Score
Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE): Change From Baseline to End of Month 3Double-Blind Active / Open-Label ActiveDistress3.5Full Range -2 to 8Score
Index of Premature Ejaculation (IPE): Change From Baseline to End of Month 3Double-Blind Placebo / Open-Label ActiveDistress0.9Full Range -2 to 6Score
Percentage of Subjects With Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) > 1 Minute and >2 Minutes During the 3 Months of Double-blind TreatmentDouble-Blind Active / Open-Label ActiveIELT > 1 minute80.2percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) > 1 Minute and >2 Minutes During the 3 Months of Double-blind TreatmentDouble-Blind Placebo / Open-Label ActiveIELT > 1 minute37.8percentage of subjects

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double-blind PhaseSTARTEDDouble-Blind Active / Open-Label Active171
Double-blind PhaseSTARTEDDouble-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active85
Double-blind PhaseITTDouble-Blind Active / Open-Label Active167
Double-blind PhaseITTDouble-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active82
Double-blind PhaseCOMPLETEDDouble-Blind Active / Open-Label Active150
Double-blind PhaseCOMPLETEDDouble-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active77
Double-blind PhaseNOT COMPLETEDDouble-Blind Active / Open-Label Active21
Double-blind PhaseNOT COMPLETEDDouble-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active8
Open-Label PhaseSTARTEDDouble-Blind Active / Open-Label Active146
Open-Label PhaseSTARTEDDouble-Blind Placebo / Open-Label Active77

Adverse events21

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherErectile dysfunctionReproductive system and breast disordersDouble-Blind Active916714
otherErectile dysfunctionReproductive system and breast disordersDouble-Blind Placebo0820
otherErectile dysfunctionReproductive system and breast disordersOpen Label Phase822320
seriousBurns second degreeInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsDouble-Blind Active11671
seriousBurns second degreeInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsDouble-Blind Placebo0820
seriousBurns second degreeInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsOpen Label Phase02230
seriousContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsDouble-Blind Active01670
seriousContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsDouble-Blind Placebo1821
seriousContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsOpen Label Phase02230
seriousConcussionInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsDouble-Blind Active01670

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-Blind Active
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-Blind Placebo
Total, all-cause mortalityOpen Label Phase
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-Blind Active9167
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-Blind Placebo082
Total, other adverse eventsOpen Label Phase8223
Total, serious adverse eventsDouble-Blind Active1167
Total, serious adverse eventsDouble-Blind Placebo182
Total, serious adverse eventsOpen Label Phase4223

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
12934056BACKGROUNDPubMed
17129234BACKGROUNDPubMed
17608824BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00556478

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00556478/results?page=2