ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00561574

A Long-Term Safety Study of Org 50081 (Esmirtazapine) in Elderly Outpatients With Chronic Primary Insomnia (176005/P05697/MK-8265-001)

NCT00561574, Phase 3, Completed, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; results first posted 2014-07-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Long-Term Safety Study of Org 50081 (Esmirtazapine) in Elderly Outpatients With Chronic Primary Insomnia (176005/P05697/MK-8265-001). Trials, record NCT00561574. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00561574

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Long-Term Safety Study of Org 50081 (Esmirtazapine) in Elderly Outpatients With Chronic Primary Insomnia (176005/P05697/MK-8265-001)
NCT number
NCT00561574
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
259 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Conditions
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorder; Elderly, Mental Disorder, Dyssomnias, Sleep Disorders, Sleep Disorder, Intrinsic
Interventions
Esmirtazapine
First posted
2007-11-21
Last updated
2021-01-27
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2007-003636-35
Results first posted
2014-07-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Experience at Least One Adverse Event (AE)Up to 53 weeks
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to the study drug.
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AEUp to 52 weeks
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to the study drug.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Alertness at AwakeningBaseline and Week 52
Alertness at awakening was assessed by participants using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) in response to Weekly Sleep Diary question 6 "How did you feel upon awakening over the past 7 days?". Scores could range from 0=Tired to 100=Alert. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment of Days -7 to 1 before any study drug was taken. Change from Baseline was calculated using an observed cases (OC) approach.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Feeling Full of EnergyBaseline and Week 52
Feeling full of energy was assessed by participants using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) in response to Weekly Sleep Diary question 7 "How full of energy have you felt over the past 7 days?". Scores could range from 0=Terribly tired to 100=Full of energy. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment of Days -7 to 1 before any study drug was taken. Change from Baseline was calculated using an OC approach.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Ability to Work/FunctionBaseline and Week 52
Ability to work/function was assessed by participants using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) in response to Weekly Sleep Diary question 8 "How were you able to work or function over the past 7 days?". Scores could range from 0=Not at all to 100=Very well. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment of Days -7 to 1 before any study drug was taken. Change from Baseline was calculated using an OC approach.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Total Nap TimeBaseline and Week 52
Total nap time was assessed by participants in response to Weekly Sleep Diary question 9a "How much time per day did you nap, on average?". Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment of Days -7 to 1 before any study drug was taken. Change from Baseline was calculated using an OC approach.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Total Sleep Time (TST)Baseline and Week 52
TST was defined as the time recorded by participants in response to Weekly Sleep Diary question 4 "During the past 7 nights, how much time did you actually spend sleeping, on average?". Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment of Days -7 to 1 before any study drug was taken. Change from Baseline was calculated using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO)Baseline and Week 52
WASO was defined as the time recorded by participants in response to Weekly Sleep Diary question 4 "During the past 7 nights, how much time were you awake, on average, after falling asleep initially?" Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment of Days -7 to 1 before any study drug was taken. Change from Baseline was calculated using a LOCF approach.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sleep Latency (SL)Baseline and Week 52
SL was defined as the time recorded by participants in response to Weekly Sleep Diary question 4 "During the past 7 nights, how long did it take you to fall asleep, on average?" Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment of Days -7 to 1 before any study drug was taken. Change from Baseline was calculated using a LOCF approach.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Number of Awakenings (NAW)Baseline and Week 52
NAW was defined as the time recorded by participants in response to Weekly Sleep Diary question 2a "During the past 7 nights, how many times did you wake up, on average?" Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment of Days -7 to 1 before any study drug was taken. Change from Baseline was calculated using a LOCF approach.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Who Experience at Least One Adverse Event (AE)Up to 53 weeksThe All-Subjects-Treated (AST) population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.ParticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AEUp to 52 weeksThe AST population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.ParticipantsNUMBER
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Alertness at AwakeningBaseline and Week 52The AST population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.Score on a ScaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Feeling Full of EnergyBaseline and Week 52The AST population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.Score on a ScaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Ability to Work/FunctionBaseline and Week 52The AST population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.Score on a ScaleMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Total Nap TimeBaseline and Week 52The AST population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.MinutesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Total Sleep Time (TST)Baseline and Week 52The Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one postbaseline TST assessment.MinutesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO)Baseline and Week 52The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one postbaseline WASO assessment.MinutesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Sleep Latency (SL)Baseline and Week 52The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one postbaseline SL assessment.MinutesMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Number of Awakenings (NAW)Baseline and Week 52The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one postbaseline NAW assessment.Number of AwakeningsMEAN

Results by group36

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Adverse Event (AE)Esmirtazapine 1.5 mg115Participants
Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Adverse Event (AE)Esmirtazapine 3.0 mg116Participants
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AEEsmirtazapine 1.5 mg21Participants
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AEEsmirtazapine 3.0 mg24Participants
Change From Baseline in Alertness at AwakeningEsmirtazapine 1.5 mgBaseline (BL) (n=121, 123)38.3Standard Deviation 17.2Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Alertness at AwakeningEsmirtazapine 3.0 mgBaseline (BL) (n=121, 123)38.3Standard Deviation 18.3Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Alertness at AwakeningEsmirtazapine 1.5 mgChange from BL at Week 52 (n=61, 53)25.6Standard Deviation 29.1Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Alertness at AwakeningEsmirtazapine 3.0 mgChange from BL at Week 52 (n=61, 53)21.7Standard Deviation 25.1Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Feeling Full of EnergyEsmirtazapine 1.5 mgBL (n=121, 123)42.6Standard Deviation 16.8Score on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Feeling Full of EnergyEsmirtazapine 3.0 mgBL (n=121, 123)43.3Standard Deviation 18.2Score on a Scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEsmirtazapine 1.5 mg128
Overall StudySTARTEDEsmirtazapine 3.0 mg131
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEsmirtazapine 1.5 mg80
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEsmirtazapine 3.0 mg73
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEsmirtazapine 1.5 mg48
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEsmirtazapine 3.0 mg58

Adverse events66

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersEsmirtazapine 1.5 mg71287
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersEsmirtazapine 3.0 mg91319
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersEsmirtazapine 1.5 mg1012813
otherDry mouthGastrointestinal disordersEsmirtazapine 3.0 mg1413115
otherFatigueGeneral disordersEsmirtazapine 1.5 mg1712818
otherFatigueGeneral disordersEsmirtazapine 3.0 mg1513118
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsEsmirtazapine 1.5 mg2112826
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsEsmirtazapine 3.0 mg1713121
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsEsmirtazapine 1.5 mg21283
otherUrinary tract infectionInfections and infestationsEsmirtazapine 3.0 mg1013110

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEsmirtazapine 1.5 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityEsmirtazapine 3.0 mg
Total, other adverse eventsEsmirtazapine 1.5 mg83128
Total, other adverse eventsEsmirtazapine 3.0 mg102131
Total, serious adverse eventsEsmirtazapine 1.5 mg9128
Total, serious adverse eventsEsmirtazapine 3.0 mg6131

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Esmirtazapine 1.5 mg vs Esmirtazapine 3.0 mg: Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AETrial comparisons
Esmirtazapine 1.5 mg vs Esmirtazapine 3.0 mg: Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Adverse Event (AE)Trial comparisons
Esmirtazapine 1.5 mg vs Esmirtazapine 3.0 mg: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00561574

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00561574/results?page=2