ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00565812

A Long-Term, Placebo-Controlled X-Ray Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of SD-6010 in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

NCT00565812, Phase 2, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2016-12-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Long-Term, Placebo-Controlled X-Ray Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of SD-6010 in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Trials, record NCT00565812. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00565812

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Long-Term, Placebo-Controlled X-Ray Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of SD-6010 in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT number
NCT00565812
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
1,457 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Osteoarthritis
Interventions
SD-6010, SD-6010, Placebo
First posted
2007-11-30
Last updated
2016-12-30
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2007-001457-26
Results first posted
2016-12-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes44

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryRate of Progression of Joint Space NarrowingBaseline up to Month 24
Rate of progression of joint space narrowing (JSN) was defined as narrowing in joint space width (JSW) over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in millimeter per year (mm/year) over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. Negative values indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.
PrimaryRate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2Baseline up to Month 24
Rate of progression of JSN was defined as narrowing in joint space width over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in mm/year over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. KLG system was a method of classifying the severity of knee OA using five grades (0 \[no severity\] to 4 \[maximum severity\], higher grade indicating worse knee function). Negative values of slope indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.
PrimaryRate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Equal to (=) 3Baseline up to Month 24
Rate of progression of JSN was defined as narrowing in joint space width over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in mm/year over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. KLG system was a method of classifying the severity of knee OA using five grades (0 \[no severity\] to 4 \[maximum severity\], higher grade indicating worse knee function). Negative values of slope indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Composite Index Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
The WOMAC was a self-administered, disease-specific instrument which probed clinically important, participant relevant symptoms in the areas of pain, stiffness, and physical function in participants with OA of the knee. The WOMAC composite index was the sum of 24 individual questions regarding subscales of pain, stiffness and physical function (for each item score range: 0 \[minimum\] to 4 \[maximum\], higher score indicating worse knee condition). Total score was sum of the 3 subscale scores, giving a possible overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 96 (maximum). Higher score indicating the worse level of pain, stiffness and physical function.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
The WOMAC pain subscale was comprised of 5 questions regarding the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC pain subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse pain. An overall subscale score range of 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more pain.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Pain Stiffness Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease in which the participant moved the knee with OA. The WOMAC stiffness subscale was comprised of 2 questions regarding the degree of stiffness experienced in the study knee. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse stiffness. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more stiffness.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
The WOMAC physical function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC physical function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritic Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Pain VAS was a self-administered instrument, a 100 millimeter (mm) line marked by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 (mm) =no pain to 100 (mm) =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using the scale ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), where 1 =very good, 2 =good, 3 =fair, 4 =poor and 5 =very poor. Higher scores indicating worse condition.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Physician assessed the overall impact of arthritis on the participant's daily life. Participant's condition was rated by the physician using the scale ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), where 1= very good, 2= good, 3= fair, 4= poor and 5= very poor. Higher scores indicating worse condition.

Outcomes44

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYRate of Progression of Joint Space NarrowingBaseline up to Month 24FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' (N) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.mm/yearMEAN
PRIMARYRate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2Baseline up to Month 24FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'N' signifies participants with KLG \<=2 and evaluable for this outcome measure.mm/yearMEAN
PRIMARYRate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Equal to (=) 3Baseline up to Month 24FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'N' signifies participants with KLG =3 and evaluable for this outcome measure.mm/yearMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Composite Index Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Pain Stiffness Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritic Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.mmMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group624

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Rate of Progression of Joint Space NarrowingSD-0610 50 Milligram (mg)-0.101Standard Deviation 0.346mm/year
Rate of Progression of Joint Space NarrowingSD-0610 200 mg-0.125Standard Deviation 0.298mm/year
Rate of Progression of Joint Space NarrowingPlacebo-0.109Standard Deviation 0.261mm/year
Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg)-0.061Standard Deviation 0.335mm/year
Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2SD-0610 200 mg-0.069Standard Deviation 0.254mm/year
Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2Placebo-0.075Standard Deviation 0.221mm/year
Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Equal to (=) 3SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg)-0.133Standard Deviation 0.352mm/year
Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Equal to (=) 3SD-0610 200 mg-0.162Standard Deviation 0.319mm/year
Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Equal to (=) 3Placebo-0.136Standard Deviation 0.286mm/year
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Composite Index Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg)Baseline (n =481, 482, 481)39.07Standard Deviation 18.85units on a scale

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSD-6010 50 Milligram (mg)485
Overall StudySTARTEDSD-6010 200 mg486
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo486
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSD-6010 50 Milligram (mg)341
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSD-6010 200 mg351
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo356
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSD-6010 50 Milligram (mg)144
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSD-6010 200 mg135
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo130

Adverse events2,724

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSD-6010 50 Milligram (mg)2482
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSD-6010 200 mg2485
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo9485
otherEosinophiliaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSD-6010 50 Milligram (mg)1482
otherEosinophiliaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSD-6010 200 mg1485
otherEosinophiliaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo2485
otherHypochromasiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSD-6010 50 Milligram (mg)0482
otherHypochromasiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSD-6010 200 mg1485
otherHypochromasiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo1485
otherHypochromic anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSD-6010 50 Milligram (mg)0482

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySD-6010 50 Milligram (mg)
Total, all-cause mortalitySD-6010 200 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsSD-6010 50 Milligram (mg)365482
Total, other adverse eventsSD-6010 200 mg371485
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo360485
Total, serious adverse eventsSD-6010 50 Milligram (mg)43482
Total, serious adverse eventsSD-6010 200 mg61485
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo49485

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
23144445DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00565812

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00565812/registered?page=2