ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00578786

Outcomes22

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
SECONDARYBaseline Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minute Walk Distance TestBaseline
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set; subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the extension study. The LOCF method of imputation was used; only postbaseline observations were carried forward.
MetersMEAN
PRIMARYFrequently Reported (15% or More Overall) Adverse Events by SeverityBaseline to Week 295
Safety Analysis Set: Includes all participants who received at least 1 dose of AMB in one of the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the current extension study. Treatment group assignments for the safety analysis set were based upon the highest dose of AMB received at any time during the parent or extension studies.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minute Walk Distance TestBaseline to Week 24
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set; subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the extension study. The LOCF method of imputation was used; only postbaseline observations were carried forward.
MetersMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 48 (Year 1) in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minute Walk Distance TestBaseline to Week 48
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set; subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the extension study. The LOCF method of imputation was used; only postbaseline observations were carried forward.
MetersMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Year 2 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minute Walk Distance TestBaseline to Year 2
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set; subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the extension study. The LOCF method of imputation was used; only postbaseline observations were carried forward.
MetersMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Year 3 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minute Walk Distance TestBaseline to Year 3
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set; subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the extension study. The LOCF method of imputation was used; only postbaseline observations were carried forward.
MetersMEAN
SECONDARYBaseline Borg Dyspnea IndexBaseline
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set, such that subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the current extension study.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Year 1 in Borg Dyspnea IndexBaseline to Year 1
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set; subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the extension study. The LOCF method of imputation was used; only postbaseline observations were carried forward.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Year 2 in Borg Dyspnea IndexBaseline to Year 2
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set; subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the extension study. The LOCF method of imputation was used; only postbaseline observations were carried forward.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Year 3 in Borg Dyspnea IndexBaseline to Year 3
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set; subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the extension study. The LOCF method of imputation was used; only postbaseline observations were carried forward.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYBaseline World Health Organization (WHO) Functional ClassBaseline
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set, such that subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the current extension study.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Year 1 in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional ClassBaseline to Year 1
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set; subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in extension study. Missing values imputed using LOCF based on post-baseline observations.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Year 2 in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional ClassBaseline to Year 2
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set; subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in extension study. Missing values were imputed using LOCF based on post-baseline observations.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Year 3 in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional ClassBaseline to Year 3
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set; subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the extension study. Missing values were imputed using LOCF based on post-baseline observations.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYBaseline SF-36 Health Survey Scales for the Combined Ambrisentan GroupBaselineAll participants were combined into one group for this analysis (all doses) and an observed-case approach was used.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 12 in SF-36 Health Survey Scales for the Combined Ambrisentan GroupBaseline to Week 12All participants were combined into one group for this analysis (all doses) and an observed-case approach was used.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in SF-36 Health Survey Scales for the Combined Ambrisentan GroupBaseline to Week 24All participants were combined into one group for this analysis (all doses) and an observed-case approach was used.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 36 in SF-36 Health Survey Scales for the Combined Ambrisentan GroupBaseline to Week 36All participants were combined into one group for this analysis (all doses) and an observed-case approach was used.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With No Clinical Worsening of PAHBaseline to Year 3
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set, such that subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the current extension study.
percent probability (KM estimate)NUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Failure-Free Treatment StatusBaseline to Year 4
All assessments of efficacy were performed using the randomized analysis set, such that subjects were allotted to an individual dose group based upon their randomized treatment assignment in the 2 prior studies (NCT00423748 or NCT00423202) or in the current extension study.
percent probability (KM estimate)NUMBER

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00578786/outcomes