ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00579982

An Open-Label Trial Measuring Satisfaction And Convenience Of Two Formulations Of Lamotrigine In Subjects With A Mood Disorder

NCT00579982, Phase 3, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2009-08-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Open-Label Trial Measuring Satisfaction And Convenience Of Two Formulations Of Lamotrigine In Subjects With A Mood Disorder. Trials, record NCT00579982. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00579982

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Open-Label Trial Measuring Satisfaction And Convenience Of Two Formulations Of Lamotrigine In Subjects With A Mood Disorder
NCT number
NCT00579982
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
97 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Mood Disorders
Interventions
Lamotrigine
First posted
2007-12-24
Last updated
2016-12-16
Results first posted
2009-08-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Mean Change From Baseline in the Convenience Subscale Score (CSS) Derived From the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v 1.4) Using Items 9 (Ease of Use), 10 (Ease of Planning to Use), and 11 (Convenience) at Week 3.
Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal
The CSS is the sum of items 9 (values: 1=Extremely difficult - 7=Extremely easy), 10 (same set of values as for 9), and 11 (1=Extremely inconvenient - 7=Extremely convenient). The sum has 3 subtracted from it, is divided by 18, and then multiplied by 100; the range is 0-100. Change from baseline=end of study CSS minus baseline score.
Secondary
Mean Change From Baseline in the Global Satisfaction Subscale Score, From the TSQM Using Items 12 (Confidence in Medicine), 13 (Certainty That Good Things About Medication Outweigh Bad Things), and 14 (Satisfaction With Medication) at Week 3
Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal
The Global Satisfaction Subscale Score is the sum of item 12 (values: 1=Not at all confident - 5=Extremely confident), item 13 (values: 1=Not at all certain - 5=Extremely certain), and item 14 (Extremely dissatisfied - 7=Extremely satisfied). The sum has 3 subtracted from it, is divided by 14, and then multiplied by 100; thus, the range is 0-100.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Illness-Severity at Week 3Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or at Early WithdrawalClinician assessment evaluating how mentally ill the patient is at time of evaluation. The questionnaire is based on a 7-point scale (from1 = Normal to 7 = Among the most extremely ill patients).
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Score at Week 3Baseline, End of Study (Week 3 weeks) or at Early Withdrawal
Participant-reported questionnaire consisting of 21 items on a 4 point scale (0 to 3, with 3 indicating most severely ill), with the score being the sum of the items. The change from baseline is the end of study score minus the baseline score; larger values indicate more depression with the ODT formulation relative to the IR formulation.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Answering the Question "Did the Tablets Dissolve Instantly (Yes or no)?" at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal
The Organoleptic Questionnaire (9 items) was used to assess the participants' satisfaction with the physical characteristics of the ODT formulation e.g. rate of dissolution, flavor. Question number 1 on organoleptic questionnaire: Did the tablets dissolve instantly (yes or no)?
SecondaryNumber of Participants Answering the Question "How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve" at Week 3Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal
Question number 2 on organoleptic questionnaire: How satisfied or dissatisfied were you with the time it took the tablet to dissolve? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (Extremely satisfied)\]
SecondaryNumber of Participants Answering the Question "How Did the Dissolved Tablet Feel in Your Mouth?" at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalQuestion number 3 on organoleptic questionnaire: How did the dissolved tablet feel in your mouth? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely gritty) to 5 (Extremely smooth)\]
SecondaryNumber of Participants Answering the Question "How Satisfied Were You With the Flavor of the Tablet?" at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalQuestion number 4 on organoleptic questionnaire: How satisfied were you with the flavor of the tablet? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (Extremely satisfied)\]
SecondaryNumber of Participants Answering the Question "How Would You Rate the Strength of the Flavor of the Tablet"? at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalOrganoleptic Questionnaire, question 5: How would you rate the strength of the flavor of the tablet? \[from 1 a rating of (Extremely bothersome) to 5 (Extremely pleasant)\]
SecondaryNumber of Participants Answering the Question "How Would You Rate the Aftertaste of the Tablet"? at Week 3.End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal
Organoleptic Questionnaire, question 6: How would you rate the aftertaste of the tablet (the taste remaining in your mouth after swallowing the tablet)? \[from a rating of 1 (Extremely bothersome) to 6 (Did NOT experience an aftertaste)\]

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the Convenience Subscale Score (CSS) Derived From the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v 1.4) Using Items 9 (Ease of Use), 10 (Ease of Planning to Use), and 11 (Convenience) at Week 3.
Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early Withdrawal
Intent to Treat (ITT). Ninety-eight participants were enrolled in the study, but one withdrew prior to receiving lamotrigine ODT treatment. All efficacy and safety analyses are based on the Intent to Treat population, which includes the 97 patients who received at least one dose of ODT treatment.
Points on a subscaleMEAN
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the Global Satisfaction Subscale Score, From the TSQM Using Items 12 (Confidence in Medicine), 13 (Certainty That Good Things About Medication Outweigh Bad Things), and 14 (Satisfaction With Medication) at Week 3
Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalITTPoints on a subscaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Illness-Severity at Week 3Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or at Early WithdrawalITTPoints on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Score at Week 3Baseline, End of Study (Week 3 weeks) or at Early WithdrawalITTPoints on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Answering the Question Did the Tablets Dissolve Instantly (Yes or no)? at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalITTNumber of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve at Week 3Baseline, End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalITTNumber of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Did the Dissolved Tablet Feel in Your Mouth? at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalITTNumber of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied Were You With the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalITTNumber of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Strength of the Flavor of the Tablet? at Week 3End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalITTNumber of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Answering the Question How Would You Rate the Aftertaste of the Tablet? at Week 3.End of Study (Week 3) or Early WithdrawalITTNumber of participantsNUMBER

Results by group54

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Change From Baseline in the Convenience Subscale Score (CSS) Derived From the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM v 1.4) Using Items 9 (Ease of Use), 10 (Ease of Planning to Use), and 11 (Convenience) at Week 3.
Lamotrigine23.3Standard Deviation 22.5Points on a subscale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Global Satisfaction Subscale Score, From the TSQM Using Items 12 (Confidence in Medicine), 13 (Certainty That Good Things About Medication Outweigh Bad Things), and 14 (Satisfaction With Medication) at Week 3
Lamotrigine-0.3Standard Deviation 29.34Points on a subscale
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Illness-Severity at Week 3Lamotrigine0.0Standard Deviation 0.81Points on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) Score at Week 3Lamotrigine-1.7Standard Deviation 9.52Points on a scale
Number of Participants Answering the Question Did the Tablets Dissolve Instantly (Yes or no)? at Week 3LamotrigineYes60Number of participants
Number of Participants Answering the Question Did the Tablets Dissolve Instantly (Yes or no)? at Week 3LamotrigineNo37Number of participants
Number of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve at Week 3LamotrigineExtremely dissatisfied3Number of participants
Number of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve at Week 3LamotrigineVery dissatisfied10Number of participants
Number of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve at Week 3LamotrigineSatisfied37Number of participants
Number of Participants Answering the Question How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Were You With the Time it Took the Tablet to Dissolve at Week 3LamotrigineVery satisfied18Number of participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLamotrigine97
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLamotrigine89
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLamotrigine8

Adverse events32

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnxietyPsychiatric disordersLamotrigine397
otherDepressionPsychiatric disordersLamotrigine397
otherHypomaniaPsychiatric disordersLamotrigine397
otherDepressed moodPsychiatric disordersLamotrigine197
otherInsomniaPsychiatric disordersLamotrigine197
otherRestlessnessPsychiatric disordersLamotrigine197
otherSuicidal ideationPsychiatric disordersLamotrigine197
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersLamotrigine597
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersLamotrigine197
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersLamotrigine297

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLamotrigine
Total, other adverse eventsLamotrigine2897
Total, serious adverse eventsLamotrigine197

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
23687443BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00579982

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00579982/results?page=2