ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00587158

Oral Paricalcitol in Kidney Transplant Recipients

NCT00587158, Not applicable, Completed, Mayo Clinic; results first posted 2013-05-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Oral Paricalcitol in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Trials, record NCT00587158. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00587158

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Oral Paricalcitol in Kidney Transplant Recipients
NCT number
NCT00587158
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
100 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Conditions
Transplant; Failure, Kidney, Renal Disease, End Stage, Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary
Interventions
Paricalcitol, Corticosteroid Avoidance Immune Suppression Protocol
First posted
2008-01-07
Last updated
2013-05-13
Results first posted
2013-05-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Subjects With Hyperparathyroidism at One Year1 year post kidney transplant
Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is a measure of how well the parathyroid gland is working and is measured by a blood test. Hyperparathyroidism (increased PTH) is defined as PTH blood value greater than 65 picograms/milliliter in the absence of hypocalcemia (low calcium) or if the subject had a parathyroidectomy (surgical removal of parathyroid glands) during the first year post-transplant.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Osteopenia/Osteoporosis of the Hip at One Year1 year post kidney transplant
Osteopenia/Osteoporosis are conditions where bone mineral density is lower than normal, reported by T-scores, measurements of the hip made using an Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. The T-score is measured and compared to a normal healthy adult. A normal bone density results in a T-score between +1.0 and -1.0. A T-score of less than or equal to -1.5 was used for this study to define the presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis. Each participant will be categorized as having or not having osteopenia/osteoporosis of the hip at the end of the first post-transplant year based on bone mineral density results.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Osteopenia/Osteoporosis of the Lumbar Spine at One Year1 year post kidney transplant
Osteopenia/Osteoporosis are conditions where bone mineral density is lower than normal, reported by T-scores, measurements of the lower spine made using an Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. The T-score is measured and compared to a normal healthy adult. A normal bone density results in a T-score between +1.0 and -1.0. A T-score of less than or equal to -1.5 was used for this study to define the presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis. Each participant will be categorized as having or not having osteopenia/osteoporosis of the lumbar spine at the end of the first post-transplant year based on bone mineral density results.
SecondarySerum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Level Over TimeBaseline, 3 weeks, 3 months, 1 year post kidney transplant
Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is a hormone synthesized in the body's parathyroid glands that controls bone health. PTH controls calcium and phosphorus levels in the body. It is measured in the serum and reported in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL).
SecondarySerum Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP) Level Over TimeBaseline, 21 days, 90 days and 1 year post kidney transplantBAP is a marker of bone turn-over, is measured in the serum and reported in micrograms per liter (mcg/L).
SecondaryChange in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)Baseline, 1 year post kidney transplant
BMD was measured using a Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan and reported by T-scores, measurements of the lower spine made using the scan. The T-score reflects how your bone density measurement compares to normal healthy adults. A normal bone density results in a T-score between +1.0 and -1.0. A T-score of less than or equal to -1.5 was used for this study to define the presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis. Osteopenia is a condition of decreased bone mass or density but not thin enough to be diagnosed as osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is a condition where bone mass/density has diminished to a level causing higher risk of fracture. The average change in T-score from baseline to one year is reported.
SecondaryChange in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD)Baseline, 1 year post kidney transplant
BMD was measured using a Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan and reported by T-scores, measurements made of the hip bones using the scan. The T-score reflects how your bone density measurement compares to normal healthy adults. A normal bone density results in a T-score between +1.0 and -1.0. A T-score of less than or equal to -1.5 was used for this study to define the presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis. Osteopenia is a condition of decreased bone mass or density but not thin enough to be diagnosed as osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is a condition where bone mass/density has diminished to a level causing higher risk of fracture. The average change in T-score from baseline to one year is reported.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Who Died or Lost Their Renal Graft During First YearBaseline to 1 year post kidney transplantThe number of subject who died (or experienced failure of their kidney surgical graft) during the first year following kidney transplant are reported here.
SecondaryEpisodes of Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR) of the Renal TransplantBaseline to 1 year post kidney transplantThe number of episodes of ACR, as proven by renal biopsy, were recorded.
SecondaryMean Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at One Year1 year post kidney transplant
Glomerular filtration rate describes the amount that fluid is filtered through the kidney and can be estimated by using serum creatinine. eGFR is reported in milliliters per minute per 1.73 m\^2 of body-surface area.

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Subjects With Hyperparathyroidism at One Year1 year post kidney transplant
Analysis was performed by the intention-to-treat principle, comprised of all subjects enrolled, who will have taken at least one dose of study medication and have both screening and any post-screening efficacy data recorded. The last observation was carried forward for missing values.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Osteopenia/Osteoporosis of the Hip at One Year1 year post kidney transplantPer-protocol analysis. Data were not available for 2 control subjects and 2 treatment subjects, as these subjects did not have the DEXA scan of the hip done at one year. \[Control n=42/ Treatment=41\]ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Osteopenia/Osteoporosis of the Lumbar Spine at One Year1 year post kidney transplantPer-protocol analysis; Data were not available for 1 subject from each arm because these subjects did not have the one year DEXA scan of the spine. \[Control n = 43/Treatment n = 42\].ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYSerum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Level Over TimeBaseline, 3 weeks, 3 months, 1 year post kidney transplant
Per-protocol analysis; the number of samples obtained at each time point varied because not all subjects were able to undergo laboratory testing at the specified timepoints. The number of subjects samples per treatment group were as follows \[Timepoint: Control(n)/Treatment(n)\]:~Baseline: 43/41, Day 21: 44/41, Day 90: 44/43, Day 365: 44/43
pg/mLMEDIAN
SECONDARYSerum Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP) Level Over TimeBaseline, 21 days, 90 days and 1 year post kidney transplant
Per-protocol analysis; the number of samples obtained at each time point varied because not all subjects were able to undergo laboratory testing at the specified study visits. The number of subjects samples per treatment group were as follows \[Timepoint: Control(n)/Treatment(n)\]:~Baseline: 43/41, Day 21: 34/38, Day 90: 36/36, Day 365: 43/41
mcg/LMEDIAN
SECONDARYChange in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)Baseline, 1 year post kidney transplantPer-protocol analysis; Not all subjects were able to undergo the DEXA scan of the spine at baseline and one-year \[Control n = 42/Treatment n = 41\].T-scoreMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD)Baseline, 1 year post kidney transplantPer-protocol analysis. Not all subjects were able to undergo the DEXA scan of the hip at baseline and one-year \[Control n = 41/Treatment n = 40\].T-scoreMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects Who Died or Lost Their Renal Graft During First YearBaseline to 1 year post kidney transplantPer-protocol analysis.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEpisodes of Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR) of the Renal TransplantBaseline to 1 year post kidney transplantPer-protocol analysis.episodesNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at One Year1 year post kidney transplantPer-protocol analysismL/min/1.73m^2MEAN

Results by group40

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Subjects With Hyperparathyroidism at One YearImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)31Participants
Number of Subjects With Hyperparathyroidism at One YearImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol15Participants
Number of Subjects With Osteopenia/Osteoporosis of the Hip at One YearImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)9Participants
Number of Subjects With Osteopenia/Osteoporosis of the Hip at One YearImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol12Participants
Number of Subjects With Osteopenia/Osteoporosis of the Lumbar Spine at One YearImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)9Participants
Number of Subjects With Osteopenia/Osteoporosis of the Lumbar Spine at One YearImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol14Participants
Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Level Over TimeImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)Baseline PTH level236Full Range 50.12 to 1048.00pg/mL
Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Level Over TimeImmunosuppression With ParicalcitolBaseline PTH level198Full Range 55.00 to 1266.00pg/mL
Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Level Over TimeImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)21 day PTH level69Full Range 26.00 to 414.00pg/mL
Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Level Over TimeImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol21 day PTH level50Full Range 11.00 to 222.00pg/mL

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)49
Overall StudySTARTEDImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol51
Overall StudyContinued in StudyImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)45
Overall StudyContinued in StudyImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol46
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)44
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol43
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol8

Adverse events132

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPost transplant diabetes mellitusEndocrine disordersImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)2492
otherPost transplant diabetes mellitusEndocrine disordersImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol4514
otherdiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)1491
otherdiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol3513
otherallergy to BactrimImmune system disordersImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)0490
otherallergy to BactrimImmune system disordersImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol1511
othergoutMetabolism and nutrition disordersImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)0490
othergoutMetabolism and nutrition disordersImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol1511
othersymptomatic hypomagnesemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)0490
othersymptomatic hypomagnesemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol1511

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)
Total, all-cause mortalityImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol
Total, other adverse eventsImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)1449
Total, other adverse eventsImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol3251
Total, serious adverse eventsImmunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control)1649
Total, serious adverse eventsImmunosuppression With Paricalcitol2751

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Immunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control) vs Immunosuppression With Paricalcitol: Number of Subjects Who Died or Lost Their Renal Graft During First YearTrial comparisons
Immunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control) vs Immunosuppression With Paricalcitol: Number of Subjects With Osteopenia/Osteoporosis of the Hip at One YearTrial comparisons
Immunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control) vs Immunosuppression With Paricalcitol: Number of Subjects With Osteopenia/Osteoporosis of the Lumbar Spine at One YearTrial comparisons
Immunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control) vs Immunosuppression With Paricalcitol: Number of Subjects With Hyperparathyroidism at One YearTrial comparisons
Immunosuppression Without Paricalcitol (Control) vs Immunosuppression With Paricalcitol: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00587158

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00587158/results?page=2