ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00597714

Efficacy Study of T Cell Depleted Allogeneic Non-myeloablative Stem Cell Transplant

NCT00597714, Phase 2, Completed, David Rizzieri, MD; results first posted 2014-06-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy Study of T Cell Depleted Allogeneic Non-myeloablative Stem Cell Transplant. Trials, record NCT00597714. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00597714

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy Study of T Cell Depleted Allogeneic Non-myeloablative Stem Cell Transplant
NCT number
NCT00597714
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
264 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
David Rizzieri, MD
Conditions
Hodgkin's Disease, Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Myeloma, Leukemia, Myelodysplasia
Interventions
Non-myeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation
First posted
2008-01-18
Last updated
2014-06-02
Results first posted
2014-06-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryDisease Free Survival2 years
Estimate disease free survival rates in participants treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates after SCT were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed univariate comparisons by using the log-rank test. DFS was defined as the period of time between the day of transplantation and either disease relapse or death due to the disease. The following variables were considered as confounders: recipient age, recipient sex, disease (myeloid or lymphoid), disease risk (standard or high), and donor type (MRD, MUD, or HAPLO donor). The percentage of participants who were disease free at 2 years is reported by donor type.
SecondaryImmune Recovery1 year
Evaluate immune recovery following this reduced intensity allogeneic immunotherapy. Quantification of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells was performed by flow cytometry on fresh peripheral blood at approximately 1 month before transplantation and then 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation. The immune recovery rates of the CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells in the MRD, MUD, and HAPLO groups were compared by performing an analysis of variance at each time point after transplantation. The median T cell counts at 12 months for each type of cell are reported by donor type.
SecondaryProgression Free Survival2 years
Progression-free survival (PFS) rates after stem cell transplant were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed univariate comparisons by using the log-rank test. PFS was defined as the period of time between the day of transplantation and either the day underlying disease progression was documented or death occurred by any cause. The following variables were considered as confounders: recipient age, recipient sex, disease (myeloid or lymphoid), disease risk (standard or high), and donor type (MRD, MUD, or HAPLO donor). The percentage of participants progression free at 2 years is reported by donor type. Progression = \> 25% increase of serum M-protein and/or urine M-protein. Also, an absolute increase in bone marrow plasma cells \> 10%, new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder.
SecondaryOverall Survival2 years
Estimate overall survival rates in participants treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates after SCT were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed univariate comparisons by using the log-rank test. OS was defined as the period of time between the day of transplantation and death. The following variables were considered as confounders: recipient age, recipient sex, disease (myeloid or lymphoid), disease risk (standard or high), and donor type (MRD, MUD, or HAPLO donor). The percentage of participants surviving 2 years by donor type is reported.
SecondaryGraft Failure180 days
Estimate toxicity including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in participants treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Bone marrow aspiration and/or biopsy were performed 3-5 weeks after transplant to assess donor-cell engraftment. Primary Graft Failure was defined as a neutrophil count below 500/μL or the absence of donor-derived hematopoiesis (\<5%donor cells) before relapse, death, or re-transplantation. Secondary Graft Failure was defined as the achievement of primary engraftment and a subsequent decrease in neutrophils to 3 consecutive counts of less than 100/μL or the absence of donor-derived hematopoiesis (\<5% donor cells) before relapse, death, or re-transplantation.
OtherGraft Versus Host Disease180 days
Estimate toxicity including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in participants treated with an alemtuzumab T cell depleted, reduced intensity preparative regimen followed by allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Bone marrow aspiration and/or biopsy were performed 3-5 weeks after transplant to assess donor-cell engraftment. Acute or chronic GVHD was diagnosed and graded according to standard criteria. Toxicity was formally graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYDisease Free Survival2 years
All subjects with complete response. Cohort A (n=62) had acute or chronic leukemia (ALL or CLL), lymphoma, or myeloma. Cohort B (n=62) had acute or chronic myeloid leukemia (AML or CML), myelodysplastic disorder or myeloproliferative disorder. DFS was analyzed by type of donor (Matched Unrelated Donor; Matched Related Donor; Haplo-identical).
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYImmune Recovery1 year
All subjects with complete response. Cohort A (n=62) had acute or chronic leukemia (ALL or CLL), lymphoma, or myeloma. Cohort B (n=62) had acute or chronic myeloid leukemia (AML or CML), myelodysplastic disorder or myeloproliferative disorder. Analysis by type of donor (Matched Unrelated Donor; Matched Related Donor; Haplo-identical).
T cells/μLMEAN
SECONDARYProgression Free Survival2 years
All participants who received transplant. Cohort A (n=62) had acute or chronic leukemia (ALL or CLL), lymphoma, or myeloma. Cohort B (n=62) had acute or chronic myeloid leukemia (AML or CML), myelodysplastic disorder or myeloproliferative disorder. Analysis by type of donor (Matched Unrelated Donor; Matched Related Donor; Haplo-identical).
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival2 years
All participants who received transplant. Cohort A (n=62) had acute or chronic leukemia (ALL or CLL), lymphoma, or myeloma. Cohort B (n=62) had acute or chronic myeloid leukemia (AML or CML), myelodysplastic disorder or myeloproliferative disorder. Analysis by type of donor (Matched Unrelated Donor; Matched Related Donor; Haplo-identical).
percentage of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDGraft Versus Host Disease180 days
All participants who received transplant. Cohort A (n=62) had acute or chronic leukemia (ALL or CLL), lymphoma, or myeloma. Cohort B (n=62) had acute or chronic myeloid leukemia (AML or CML), myelodysplastic disorder or myeloproliferative disorder. Analysis by occurrence of Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) and Graft Failure and donor type.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYGraft Failure180 days
All subjects who received transplant. Cohort A (n=62) had acute or chronic leukemia (ALL or CLL), lymphoma, or myeloma. Cohort B (n=62) had acute or chronic myeloid leukemia (AML or CML), myelodysplastic disorder or myeloproliferative disorder. Analysis by occurrence of Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) and donor type.
number of participantsNUMBER

Results by group27

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Disease Free SurvivalCohort A & B- Lymphoid & Myeloid DiseaseMatched Related Donors (MRD); n=384795% Confidence Interval 29 to 63percentage of participants
Disease Free SurvivalCohort A & B- Lymphoid & Myeloid DiseaseMatched Unrelated Donors (MUD); n=532395% Confidence Interval 12 to 36percentage of participants
Disease Free SurvivalCohort A & B- Lymphoid & Myeloid DiseaseHaploidentical related (HAPLO) donors; n=331695% Confidence Interval 5 to 33percentage of participants
Immune RecoveryCohort A & B- Lymphoid & Myeloid DiseaseMatched Related Donors (MRD) n=38 - CD3+ Tcells/uL700Standard Deviation 100T cells/μL
Immune RecoveryCohort A & B- Lymphoid & Myeloid DiseaseMatched Unrelated Donors(MUD) n=53 - CD3+Tcells/uL550Standard Deviation 150T cells/μL
Immune RecoveryCohort A & B- Lymphoid & Myeloid DiseaseHaploidentical related (HAPLO) n=33 -CD3+Tcells/uL500Standard Deviation 200T cells/μL
Immune RecoveryCohort A & B- Lymphoid & Myeloid DiseaseMatched Related Donors (MRD) n=38 - CD4+ Tcells/uL225Standard Deviation 30T cells/μL
Immune RecoveryCohort A & B- Lymphoid & Myeloid DiseaseMatched Unrelated Donors (MUD) n=53 -CD4+Tcells/uL140Standard Deviation 20T cells/μL
Immune RecoveryCohort A & B- Lymphoid & Myeloid DiseaseHaploidentical related (HAPLO) n=33 -CD4+Tcells/uL150Standard Deviation 55T cells/μL
Immune RecoveryCohort A & B- Lymphoid & Myeloid DiseaseMatched Related Donors (MRD) n=38 - CD8+ Tcells/uL420Standard Deviation 100T cells/μL

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort A - Lymphoid Disease80
Overall StudySTARTEDCohort B - Myeloid Disease57
Overall StudySTARTEDDonor94
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCohort A - Lymphoid Disease24
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCohort B - Myeloid Disease11
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDonor84
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCohort A - Lymphoid Disease56
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCohort B - Myeloid Disease46
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDonor10

Adverse events74

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherFailure to EngraftBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort A - Lymphoid Disease3803
otherFailure to EngraftBlood and lymphatic system disordersCohort B - Myeloid Disease135713
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersCohort A - Lymphoid Disease178020
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersCohort B - Myeloid Disease4574
otherFever without neutropeniaGeneral disordersCohort A - Lymphoid Disease4807
otherFever without neutropeniaGeneral disordersCohort B - Myeloid Disease0570
otherRash/desquamationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersCohort A - Lymphoid Disease2802
otherRash/desquamationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersCohort B - Myeloid Disease4575
otherMucositis/StomatitisGastrointestinal disordersCohort A - Lymphoid Disease5805
otherMucositis/StomatitisGastrointestinal disordersCohort B - Myeloid Disease2572

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCohort A - Lymphoid Disease
Total, all-cause mortalityCohort B - Myeloid Disease
Total, other adverse eventsCohort A - Lymphoid Disease7780
Total, other adverse eventsCohort B - Myeloid Disease5257
Total, serious adverse eventsCohort A - Lymphoid Disease1680
Total, serious adverse eventsCohort B - Myeloid Disease1057

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
24269380RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Cohort A - Lymphoid Disease vs Cohort B - Myeloid Disease: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00597714

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00597714/results?page=2