ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00600756

Comparison of the Subjective Well-being and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR to Risperidone

NCT00600756, Phase 3, Completed, AstraZeneca; results first posted 2012-09-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparison of the Subjective Well-being and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR to Risperidone. Trials, record NCT00600756. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00600756

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparison of the Subjective Well-being and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR to Risperidone
NCT number
NCT00600756
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
798 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Conditions
Schizophrenic Disorders
Interventions
Quetiapine XR, Risperidone
First posted
2008-01-25
Last updated
2012-10-05
Results first posted
2012-09-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes31

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryResponder Rate at Month 6 in the Per Protocol Population Using the Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptics Scale, Short Version (SWN-K) Total Score6 months
The SWN-K is comprised of 20 questions, rated on a 6-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 6 (very much). Scores range from 20 to 120, with higher scores implying higher subjective well-being. A responder is defined as a subject with an increase of 10 points or 20% from baseline in SWN-K total score (non-inferiority limit of -9.7% in responder rate)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Total Score at Month 12 in the Per Protocol PopulationBaseline and Month 12
The SWN-K is comprised of 20 questions, each of which is rated using a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (very much). Possible scores range from 20 to 120, with higher scores implying higher subjective well-being.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Total Score at Month 12 in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) PopulationBaseline and Month 12
The SWN-K is comprised of 20 questions, each of which is rated using a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (very much). Possible scores range from 20 to 120, with higher scores implying higher subjective well-being.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Physical Functioning at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Baseline and 12 months
The SWN-K total score is the sum of 5 subscores (4 questions each): physical functioning, social integration, mental functioning, self-control, and emotional regulation. The subscores are rated using a 6-point scale (the higher the grade, the better the response). Possible subscores range from 4 to 24.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Social Integration at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Baseline and 12 months
The SWN-K total score is the sum of 5 subscores (4 questions each): physical functioning, social integration, mental functioning, self-control, and emotional regulation. The subscores are rated using a 6-point scale (the higher the grade, the better the response). Possible subscores range from 4 to 24.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Mental Functioning at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Baseline and 12 months
The SWN-K total score is the sum of 5 subscores (4 questions each): physical functioning, social integration, mental functioning, self-control, and emotional regulation. The subscores are rated using a 6-point scale (the higher the grade, the better the response). Possible subscores range from 4 to 24.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Self-control at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Baseline and 12 months
The SWN-K total score is the sum of 5 subscores (4 questions each): physical functioning, social integration, mental functioning, self-control, and emotional regulation. The subscores are rated using a 6-point scale (the higher the grade, the better the response). Possible subscores range from 4 to 24.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Emotional Regulation at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Baseline and 12 months
The SWN-K total score is the sum of 5 subscores (4 questions each): physical functioning, social integration, mental functioning, self-control, and emotional regulation. The subscores are rated using a 6-point scale (the higher the grade, the better the response). Possible subscores range from 4 to 24.
SecondaryThe Remission Rate in Both the Quetiapine XR Group and the Risperidone Group at Month 12 in the ITT Population12 monthsRemission was defined as a SWN-K total score greater than or equal to 80. The reported population is participants who showed remission over, time from baseline to Month 12
Secondary
The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 in the ITT Population on Core Schizophrenic and Depressive Symptoms by Evaluating the Change From Baseline in CGI-SCH Overall Severity Score (Improved).
12 months
For the CGI-SCH overall severity of illness, the score ranged from 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (among the most severely ill). CGI-SCH score was divided into 3 classes: worsening (change score\>0), stable (change score=0) and improved (change score\<0). Change from baseline in CGI-SCH overall severity of illness in number of participants with CGI-SCH overall severity score improvement.

Outcomes31

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYResponder Rate at Month 6 in the Per Protocol Population Using the Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptics Scale, Short Version (SWN-K) Total Score6 months
For Per Protocol at Month 6 analysis, the difference from Randomized analysis (395) was no study drug (4); SWN-K score missing (12), and did not meet inclusion criteria (169) for Quetiapine XR. For Risperidone, the difference from Randomized analysis (403) was no study drug (1); SWN-K score missing (10), and did not meet inclusion criteria (160).
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Total Score at Month 12 in the Per Protocol PopulationBaseline and Month 12
For Per Protocol at Month 12 analysis, the difference from Randomized analysis (395) was no study drug (4); SWN-K score missing (12), and did not meet inclusion criteria (206) for Quetiapine XR. For Risperidone, the difference from Randomized analysis (403) was no study drug (1); SWN-K score missing (10), and did not meet inclusion criteria (201).
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Total Score at Month 12 in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) PopulationBaseline and Month 12
For Per Protocol at Month 12 analysis, the difference from Randomized analysis (395) was no study drug (4); SWN-K score missing (12), and did not meet inclusion criteria (206) for Quetiapine XR. For Risperidone, the difference from Randomized analysis (403) was no study drug (1); SWN-K score missing (10), and did not meet inclusion criteria (201).
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Physical Functioning at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Baseline and 12 months
The ITT analysis set at Month 12 is presented. For Quetiapine XR, there were 168 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 211 evaluable subjects at Month 12. For Risperidone, there were 165 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 227 evaluable subjects at Month 12.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Social Integration at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Baseline and 12 months
The ITT analysis set at Month 12 is presented. For Quetiapine XR, there were 168 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 211 evaluable subjects at Month 12. For Risperidone, there were 165 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 227 evaluable subjects at Month 12.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Mental Functioning at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Baseline and 12 months
The ITT analysis set at Month 12 is presented. For Quetiapine XR, there were 168 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 211 evaluable subjects at Month 12. For Risperidone, there were 165 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 227 evaluable subjects at Month 12.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Self-control at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Baseline and 12 months
The ITT analysis set at Month 12 is presented. For Quetiapine XR, there were 168 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 211 evaluable subjects at Month 12. For Risperidone, there were 165 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 227 evaluable subjects at Month 12.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Emotional Regulation at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Baseline and 12 months
The ITT analysis set at Month 12 is presented. For Quetiapine XR, there were 168 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 211 evaluable subjects at Month 12. For Risperidone, there were 165 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 227 evaluable subjects at Month 12.
Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYThe Remission Rate in Both the Quetiapine XR Group and the Risperidone Group at Month 12 in the ITT Population12 months
The ITT analysis set at Month 12 is presented. For Quetiapine XR, there were 168 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 211 evaluable subjects at Month 12. For Risperidone, there were 165 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 227 evaluable subjects at Month 12.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARY
The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 in the ITT Population on Core Schizophrenic and Depressive Symptoms by Evaluating the Change From Baseline in CGI-SCH Overall Severity Score (Improved).
12 months
The ITT analysis set at Month 12 is presented. For Quetiapine XR, there were 168 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 211 evaluable subjects at Month 12. For Risperidone, there were 165 missing CGI-SCH assessments, resulting in 227 evaluable subjects at Month 12.
ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group62

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Responder Rate at Month 6 in the Per Protocol Population Using the Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptics Scale, Short Version (SWN-K) Total ScoreQuetiapine XR136Participants
Responder Rate at Month 6 in the Per Protocol Population Using the Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptics Scale, Short Version (SWN-K) Total ScoreRisperidone158Participants
Change From Baseline in Mean Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Total Score at Month 12 in the Per Protocol PopulationQuetiapine XR23.2Standard Error 1.55Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Total Score at Month 12 in the Per Protocol PopulationRisperidone21.1Standard Error 1.49Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Total Score at Month 12 in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) PopulationQuetiapine XR22.7Standard Error 1.34Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Total Score at Month 12 in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) PopulationRisperidone19.4Standard Error 1.0Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Physical Functioning at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Quetiapine XR4.9Standard Error 0.32Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Physical Functioning at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Risperidone4.0Standard Error 0.31Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Social Integration at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Quetiapine XR4.6Standard Error 0.32Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Social Integration at Month 12 in the ITT Population.Risperidone4.0Standard Error 0.31Scores on a scale

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Analysis After 6 MonthsSTARTEDQuetiapine XR395
Analysis After 6 MonthsSTARTEDRisperidone403
Analysis After 6 MonthsCOMPLETEDQuetiapine XR264
Analysis After 6 MonthsCOMPLETEDRisperidone283
Analysis After 6 MonthsNOT COMPLETEDQuetiapine XR131
Analysis After 6 MonthsNOT COMPLETEDRisperidone120
Overall Study Analysis After 12 MonthsSTARTEDQuetiapine XR395
Overall Study Analysis After 12 MonthsSTARTEDRisperidone403
Overall Study Analysis After 12 MonthsRandomized AnalysisQuetiapine XR395
Overall Study Analysis After 12 MonthsRandomized AnalysisRisperidone403

Adverse events98

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherSomnolenceNervous system disordersQuetiapine XR71391
otherSomnolenceNervous system disordersRisperidone47402
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersQuetiapine XR23391
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersRisperidone39402
otherDizziness PosturalNervous system disordersQuetiapine XR23391
otherDizziness PosturalNervous system disordersRisperidone18402
otherSedationNervous system disordersQuetiapine XR25391
otherSedationNervous system disordersRisperidone15402
otherTremorNervous system disordersQuetiapine XR7391
otherTremorNervous system disordersRisperidone29402

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityQuetiapine XR
Total, all-cause mortalityRisperidone
Total, other adverse eventsQuetiapine XR238391
Total, other adverse eventsRisperidone258402
Total, serious adverse eventsQuetiapine XR45391
Total, serious adverse eventsRisperidone26402

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
23953270DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons17

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Quetiapine XR vs Risperidone: The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Study Because of an TEAE at Month 12 in the Safety Population
Trial comparisons
Quetiapine XR vs Risperidone: The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants at Month 12 in the Safety Population With Individual Symptoms Assessed by the Modified UKU: Sexual Dysfunction in Men
Trial comparisons
Quetiapine XR vs Risperidone: Responder Rate at Month 6 in the Per Protocol Population Using the Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptics Scale, Short Version (SWN-K) Total ScoreTrial comparisons
Quetiapine XR vs Risperidone: The Compliance of Patients Taking Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 by Evaluating the Number of Participants Who Returned Study Drug at Month 12 in the ITT Population
Trial comparisons
Quetiapine XR vs Risperidone: The Remission Rate in Both the Quetiapine XR Group and the Risperidone Group at Month 12 in the ITT PopulationTrial comparisons
Quetiapine XR vs Risperidone: The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Relapse Rate at Month 12 in the ITT PopulationTrial comparisons
Quetiapine XR vs Risperidone: The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants at Month 12 in the Safety Population With Individual Symptoms Assessed by the Modified UKU: Hyperprolactinaemia in Women
Trial comparisons
Quetiapine XR vs Risperidone: The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone Regarding Health Economics Outcomes by Evaluating the Number of Participants Using Other Psychotropic Medications at Month 12 in the ITT Population
Trial comparisons
Quetiapine XR vs Risperidone: Number of Subjects Who Had an Unscheduled Visits Due to Worsening of Schizophrenia, Dose Change, or Adverse Event at Month 12 in the ITT PopulationTrial comparisons
Quetiapine XR vs Risperidone: The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants Who Had at Least 1 Extra-pyramidal TEAE at Month 12 in the Safety Population
Trial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00600756

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00600756/registered?page=2