ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00605722

A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) and Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Liver Cancer.

NCT00605722, Phase 2, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2014-07-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) and Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Liver Cancer. Trials, record NCT00605722. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00605722

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) and Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Liver Cancer.
NCT number
NCT00605722
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
51 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Liver Cancer
Interventions
bevacizumab (Avastin), erlotinib (Tarceva)
First posted
2008-01-31
Last updated
2014-07-14
Results first posted
2014-07-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)Week 16
Percentage of participants who were alive and without documented progressive disease 16 weeks after their first dose of study drug. Diagnosis of Progressive Disease was made by objective criteria (RECIST criteria) on the target lesion(s), or by documenting, with Computerised Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CT/MRI) scans, the presence of newly occurring lesion(s) arising outside the scanned areas of the target lesions. PD required at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR)Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). Analysis of tumor response was based on the best overall response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), which was defined as the best response recorded from the start of trial treatment until disease progression/recurrence (or death), taking as reference for progressive disease (PD) the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions; for non-target lesions disappearance of lesions and normal tumour marker levels. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, using as reference the Baseline sum LD. PD required at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR)Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
Disease Control Rate was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) for at least 8 weeks by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions; for non-target lesions disappearance of lesions and normal tumour marker levels. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, using as reference the Baseline sum LD. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started; for non-target lesions persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumour marker level above the normal limits.
SecondaryTime to Tumor ProgressionEvent driven (median follow-up 12 months)
Time to tumor progression was defined as the time period in months from the start of study drug treatment to disease progression. Progressive disease required at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)
PFS was defined as the time period in months from the start of study drug treatment to the first of either progression or death. Progressive disease required at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)OS was defined as the time period in months from the start of study drug treatment to death.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to 107 Weeks
An AE was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study and laboratory or clinical tests that resulted in a change in treatment or discontinuation from study drug were reported as adverse events. A SAE was any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)Week 16
Intent-to-treat population included all participants who received study drug. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of study completion or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment or last follow up for progression of disease.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Response Rate (ORR)Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)Intent-to-treat population included all participants who received study drug.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDisease Control Rate (DCR)Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)Intent-to-treat population included all participants who received study drug.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Tumor ProgressionEvent driven (median follow-up 12 months)Intent-to-treat population included all participants who received study drug.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYProgression-free Survival (PFS)Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)Intent-to-treat population included all participants who received study drug. Participants were censored at the last follow-up visit.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)Event driven (median follow-up 12 months)Intent-to-treat population included all participants who received study drug.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to 107 WeeksSafety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug.participantsNUMBER

Results by group9

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)Bevacizumab + Erlotinib35.395% Confidence Interval 22.4 to 49.9percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)Bevacizumab + ErlotinibComplete Response0.095% Confidence Interval 0.0 to 7.0percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)Bevacizumab + ErlotinibPartial Response5.995% Confidence Interval 1.2 to 16.2percentage of participants
Disease Control Rate (DCR)Bevacizumab + Erlotinib52.995% Confidence Interval 38.5 to 67.1Percentage of participants
Time to Tumor ProgressionBevacizumab + Erlotinib2.995% Confidence Interval 1.8 to 5.3Months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Bevacizumab + Erlotinib2.995% Confidence Interval 1.8 to 4.8months
Overall Survival (OS)Bevacizumab + Erlotinib10.795% Confidence Interval 7.4 to NAmonths
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Bevacizumab + ErlotinibSerious Adverse Events19participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Bevacizumab + ErlotinibAdverse Events51participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBevacizumab + Erlotinib51
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBevacizumab + Erlotinib0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBevacizumab + Erlotinib51

Adverse events72

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherRashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersBevacizumab + Erlotinib3651
otherAcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersBevacizumab + Erlotinib2251
otherPalmer-Plantar erythrodysaesthesis syndromeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersBevacizumab + Erlotinib1151
otherPruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersBevacizumab + Erlotinib1151
otherAlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersBevacizumab + Erlotinib751
otherDry skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersBevacizumab + Erlotinib651
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersBevacizumab + Erlotinib2651
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersBevacizumab + Erlotinib1251
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersBevacizumab + Erlotinib1151
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersBevacizumab + Erlotinib851

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBevacizumab + Erlotinib
Total, other adverse eventsBevacizumab + Erlotinib5151
Total, serious adverse eventsBevacizumab + Erlotinib1951

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00605722

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00605722/events?page=2