ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00616655

Generalized Anxiety Disorder Proof of Concept Efficacy and Safety Study of SEP-225441 (Eszopiclone) In GAD Subjects

NCT00616655, Phase 2, Completed, Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.; results first posted 2015-08-21

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Generalized Anxiety Disorder Proof of Concept Efficacy and Safety Study of SEP-225441 (Eszopiclone) In GAD Subjects. Trials, record NCT00616655. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00616655

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Proof of Concept Efficacy and Safety Study of SEP-225441 (Eszopiclone) In GAD Subjects
NCT number
NCT00616655
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
456 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.
Conditions
Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Interventions
eszopiclone, eszopiclone, Placebo
First posted
2008-02-15
Last updated
2016-04-08
Results first posted
2015-08-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained RaterBaseline to Week 8
THe HAM-M was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-M rating scale. These items included: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items included: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. all items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms.
SecondaryChange in Individual Item Scores on HAM-ABaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8
The HAM-A was administered by a site trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a t5-point scale (0-4). Each HAM-A individual item score can range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety questions.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
The CGI-Swas completed by a board certified psychiatrist and represents the clinician's subjective assessment of severity of the subject's anxiety symptoms as assessed by a 7-scale score for a single question, "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how anxious is the subject at this time?" The score was based on the following scale: 1=normal, not at all anxious; 2=borderline anxious; 3=mildly anxious; 4=moderately anxious; 5=markedly anxious; 6=severly anxious; 7=among the most extremely anxious subjects. CGI-S score can range from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating higher severity.
SecondaryClinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I)Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
CGI-I was completed by a board certified psychiatrist and represented the clinician's subjective assessment of improvement of the subject's anxiety symptoms based on the following question, "Compared to his/her condition at Visit 2, how much has he/she changed?" The score was based on the following scale: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. CGI-I score can range from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating less improvement.
SecondaryHamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) 50% Anxiolytic ResponseWeek 2, 4, 6, 8
The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). A 50% anxiolytic response was defined as a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the HAM-A total score. The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms.
SecondaryHamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) RemissionWeek 2, 4, 6, 8 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Remission was defined as a HAM-A total score of 7 or less. The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms.
SecondaryChange From Baseline on Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Short FormBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
The Q-LES-Q was completed by the subject and assessed quaility of life based on 16 items, each evaluated on a 5-point scale of overall level of enjoyment/satisfaction: 1=very poor; 2=poor; 3=fair; 4=good; 5=very good. The overall percentage score was computed as a sum of items 1 to 14 as expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score: Overall Percentage Score = Sum \[item 1... item 14\]-14)/(70-14 ) \*100%. Q-LES-Q overall percentage score can range from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating higher quality of life.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Total ScoreBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on lst observation carried forward (LOCF)
The ISI was completed by the subject and is an assessment of the severity of insomnia. The administered extended ISI questionnaire consists of 5 items (containing 7 questions, as item 1 contains 3 questions) comprising the original ISI questionnaire, plus 6 quality of life related items (sleep quality, restedness/refreshness upon arising, daytime fatigue, attention/concentration, relationships and mood disturbances), and 2 items assessing duration and frequency of sleep problems. All items, except for the insomnia duration and frequency questions, are measured on a Likert-type 5-point scale (0-4). ISI total score can range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating more severe insomnia.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)
The SDS was completed by the subject and captured the subject's level of disability. The subject rated the extent to which his or her work, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities were impaired by his or her symptoms on a 10-point visual analog scale. SDS total score can range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher functional impairment.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained RaterBaseline to Week 8ITT Population: /The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one does of study medication during the double-blind period.Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period.unit on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Individual Item Scores on HAM-ABaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYClinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I)Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYHamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) 50% Anxiolytic ResponseWeek 2, 4, 6, 8ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYHamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) RemissionWeek 2, 4, 6, 8 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline on Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Short FormBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Total ScoreBaseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on lst observation carried forward (LOCF)ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)ITT Population: The ITT population will include all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication during the double-blind period.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group339

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained RaterPlacebo Arm-10.0Standard Deviation 7.0Units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained RaterEszopiclone Low Dose Arm-9.3Standard Deviation 7.4Units on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained RaterEszopiclone High Dose Arm-9.5Standard Deviation 8.1Units on a scale
Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)Placebo ArmBaseline24.2Standard Deviation 3.4unit on a scale
Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)Eszopiclone Low Dose ArmBaseline24.0Standard Deviation 3.4unit on a scale
Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)Eszopiclone High Dose ArmBaseline24.0Standard Deviation 3.7unit on a scale
Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)Placebo ArmWeek 2 - Change from baseline-5.7Standard Deviation 5.7unit on a scale
Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)Eszopiclone Low Dose ArmWeek 2 - Change from baseline-4.8Standard Deviation 5.0unit on a scale
Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)Eszopiclone High Dose ArmWeek 2 - Change from baseline-6.0Standard Deviation 6.1unit on a scale
Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)Placebo ArmWeek 4-Change from baseline-8.1Standard Deviation 6.0unit on a scale

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo Arm152
Overall StudySTARTEDEszopiclone Low Dose Arm153
Overall StudySTARTEDEszopiclone High Dose Arm151
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo Arm117
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEszopiclone Low Dose Arm112
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEszopiclone High Dose Arm103
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Arm35
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEszopiclone Low Dose Arm41
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEszopiclone High Dose Arm48

Adverse events54

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Arm1414919
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersEszopiclone Low Dose Arm71468
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersEszopiclone High Dose Arm1814521
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Arm1114911
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersEszopiclone Low Dose Arm51465
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersEszopiclone High Dose Arm1314516
otherDry MouthGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Arm61497
otherDry MouthGastrointestinal disordersEszopiclone Low Dose Arm81468
otherDry MouthGastrointestinal disordersEszopiclone High Dose Arm1214512
otherAbdominal Pain UpperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo Arm1014911

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Arm
Total, all-cause mortalityEszopiclone Low Dose Arm
Total, all-cause mortalityEszopiclone High Dose Arm
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Arm104149
Total, other adverse eventsEszopiclone Low Dose Arm111146
Total, other adverse eventsEszopiclone High Dose Arm116145
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo Arm0149
Total, serious adverse eventsEszopiclone Low Dose Arm3146
Total, serious adverse eventsEszopiclone High Dose Arm0145

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
26488677DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00616655

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00616655/results?page=2