ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00619229

Alprostadil in Maculopathy Study (AIMS)

NCT00619229, Phase 3, Terminated, UCB Pharma; results first posted 2011-04-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Alprostadil in Maculopathy Study (AIMS). Trials, record NCT00619229. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00619229

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Alprostadil in Maculopathy Study (AIMS)
NCT number
NCT00619229
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
37 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
UCB Pharma
Conditions
Macular Degeneration
Interventions
Alprostadil (prostaglandin E1), Placebo
First posted
2008-02-20
Last updated
2014-10-27
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2005-005686-11
Results first posted
2011-04-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryDifference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements at 3 Months After Drug Intervention and Measurements at Baseline (Assessed Within Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart)From baseline to 3 months
Difference in visual acuity was measured with the standard ETDRS chart with letters arranged in lines of five. The first line is assumed to have letters of a specific size and each subsequent line to consist of letters of a smaller size. The subject starts reading the first line and continues reading the following lines until failing a line. Passing a line means to name at least three of the five letters correctly.
SecondaryThe Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to time immediately after intervention
Difference in visual acuity was measured with the standard ETDRS chart with letters arranged in lines of five. The first line is assumed to have letters of a specific size and each subsequent line to consist of letters of a smaller size. The subject starts reading the first line and continues reading the following lines until failing a line. Passing a line means to name at least three of the five letters correctly.
SecondaryThe Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements at 6 Months After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to 6 months
Difference in visual acuity was measured with the standard ETDRS chart with letters arranged in lines of five. The first line is assumed to have letters of a specific size and each subsequent line to consist of letters of a smaller size. The subject starts reading the first line and continues reading the following lines until failing a line. Passing a line means to name at least three of the five letters correctly.
SecondaryProgression of the Dry Age-related Macular DegenerationFrom baseline to 6 monthsSeverity of the diagnosed dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was assessed in comparison to Baseline and classified as 1. Progression 2. Stabilization 3. Amelioration
SecondaryDevelopment of a Wet Age-related Macular DegenerationFrom baseline to 6 months
A wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is defined as the development of choroidal neovascularization of the "study-eye" (worse eye). Development is categorized in Yes and No, where Yes means that a subject who had no wet AMD at Screening has developed a wet AMD at Week 29.
SecondaryThe Difference in Contrast Sensitivity Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to time immediately after intervention
Difference in contrast sensitivity was measured with the Pelli-Robson test, using a chart with letters arranged in groups of three. The first group has unit contrast and each subsequent group has a lower contrast. Passing a group means to read correctly at least two of the three letters. A Pelli-Robson score of 2.0 indicates normal contrast sensitivity of 100 percent. Scores less than 2.0 signify poorer contrast sensitivity. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score of less than 1.5 is consistent with visual impairment and a score of less than 1.0 represents visual disability.
SecondaryThe Difference in Contrast Sensitivity Between Measurements at 3 Months After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to 3 months
Difference in contrast sensitivity was measured with the Pelli-Robson test, using a chart with letters arranged in groups of three. The first group has unit contrast and each subsequent group has a lower contrast. Passing a group means to read correctly at least two of the three letters. A Pelli-Robson score of 2.0 indicates normal contrast sensitivity of 100 percent. Scores less than 2.0 signify poorer contrast sensitivity. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score of less than 1.5 is consistent with visual impairment and a score of less than 1.0 represents visual disability.
SecondaryThe Difference in Contrast Sensitivity Between Measurements at 6 Months After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to 6 months
Difference in contrast sensitivity was measured with the Pelli-Robson test, using a chart with letters arranged in groups of three. The first group has unit contrast and each subsequent group has a lower contrast. Passing a group means to read correctly at least two of the three letters. A Pelli-Robson score of 2.0 indicates normal contrast sensitivity of 100 percent. Scores less than 2.0 signify poorer contrast sensitivity. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score of less than 1.5 is consistent with visual impairment and a score of less than 1.0 represents visual disability.
SecondaryThe Difference in Color Vision Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to time immediately after intervention
The difference in color vision after intervention in comparison to Baseline was assessed by the investigator as 'Changed from Normal to Pathologic', 'Finding unchanged', and 'Changed from Pathologic to Normal'.
SecondaryThe Difference in Color Vision Between Measurements at 3 Months After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to 3 months
The difference in color vision after intervention in comparison to Baseline was assessed by the investigator as 'Changed from Normal to Pathologic', 'Finding unchanged', and 'Changed from Pathologic to Normal'.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYDifference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements at 3 Months After Drug Intervention and Measurements at Baseline (Assessed Within Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart)From baseline to 3 monthsFull Analysis Set (FAS)Lines read in ETDRS chartMEAN
SECONDARYThe Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to time immediately after interventionFull Analysis Set (FAS)Lines read in ETDRS chartMEAN
SECONDARYThe Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements at 6 Months After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to 6 monthsFull Analysis Set (FAS)Lines read in ETDRS chartMEAN
SECONDARYProgression of the Dry Age-related Macular DegenerationFrom baseline to 6 monthsFull Analysis Set (FAS)ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDevelopment of a Wet Age-related Macular DegenerationFrom baseline to 6 monthsFull Analysis Set (FAS)ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Difference in Contrast Sensitivity Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to time immediately after interventionFull Analysis Set (FAS)Unit on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYThe Difference in Contrast Sensitivity Between Measurements at 3 Months After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to 3 monthsFull Analysis Set (FAS)Unit on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYThe Difference in Contrast Sensitivity Between Measurements at 6 Months After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to 6 monthsFull Analysis Set (FAS)Unit on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYThe Difference in Color Vision Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to time immediately after interventionFull Analysis Set (FAS)ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Difference in Color Vision Between Measurements at 3 Months After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineFrom baseline to 3 monthsFull Analysis Set (FAS)ParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group40

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements at 3 Months After Drug Intervention and Measurements at Baseline (Assessed Within Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart)Alprostadil0.94Standard Deviation 1.84Lines read in ETDRS chart
Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements at 3 Months After Drug Intervention and Measurements at Baseline (Assessed Within Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart)Placebo0.53Standard Deviation 1.66Lines read in ETDRS chart
The Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineAlprostadil1.29Standard Deviation 1.44Lines read in ETDRS chart
The Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at BaselinePlacebo0.38Standard Deviation 1.54Lines read in ETDRS chart
The Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements at 6 Months After Intervention and Measurements at BaselineAlprostadil1.31Standard Deviation 1.45Lines read in ETDRS chart
The Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements at 6 Months After Intervention and Measurements at BaselinePlacebo0.29Standard Deviation 2.11Lines read in ETDRS chart
Progression of the Dry Age-related Macular DegenerationAlprostadilProgression in disease11Participants
Progression of the Dry Age-related Macular DegenerationPlaceboProgression in disease10Participants
Progression of the Dry Age-related Macular DegenerationAlprostadilStabilization of disease1Participants
Progression of the Dry Age-related Macular DegenerationPlaceboStabilization of disease3Participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAlprostadil18
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo18
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)Alprostadil16
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)Placebo17
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAlprostadil14
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo16
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAlprostadil4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo2

Adverse events24

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherChoroidal NeovascularisationEye disordersAlprostadil0180
otherChoroidal NeovascularisationEye disordersPlacebo1181
otherVisual DisturbanceEye disordersAlprostadil0180
otherVisual DisturbanceEye disordersPlacebo1181
otherVitreous OpacitiesEye disordersAlprostadil0180
otherVitreous OpacitiesEye disordersPlacebo1181
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersAlprostadil1181
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0180
otherAbdominal Pain UpperGastrointestinal disordersAlprostadil0180
otherAbdominal Pain UpperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo1181

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAlprostadil
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsAlprostadil218
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo618
Total, serious adverse eventsAlprostadil018
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo018

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Alprostadil vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00619229

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00619229/results?page=2